Otosclerosis: audiometric results and quality of life after stapedectomy with interposition or CO2 laser-calibrated stapedotomy without interposition.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2023.2186482
Ramzi R Maalouf, Morgane Marc, Payal Mukherjee, Vincent Van Rompaey, Michael Eliezer, Charlotte Hautefort, Benjamin Verillaud, Philippe Herman, Romain Kania
{"title":"Otosclerosis: audiometric results and quality of life after stapedectomy with interposition or CO<sub>2</sub> laser-calibrated stapedotomy without interposition.","authors":"Ramzi R Maalouf,&nbsp;Morgane Marc,&nbsp;Payal Mukherjee,&nbsp;Vincent Van Rompaey,&nbsp;Michael Eliezer,&nbsp;Charlotte Hautefort,&nbsp;Benjamin Verillaud,&nbsp;Philippe Herman,&nbsp;Romain Kania","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2023.2186482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical treatment of otosclerosis consists of the replacement of the stapes using a piston.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the audiometric results and quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent surgery for otosclerosis by stapedectomy with fascia interposition (STIP) or by stapedotomy using CO<sub>2</sub> laser (SLaser) without fascia interposition.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ninety-one patients operated on for otosclerosis by STIP (40 patients) and by SLaser (51 patients) were included. Audiometric results were graphically displayed using the Amsterdam Hearing Evaluation Plot and were compared to the Common Otology Database (COD) comprising 660 patients. The patients' QOL was assessed with an otological validated survey. The significance level was <i>p</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in hearing improvement between SLaser and STIP-operated patients. There was no significant difference between our results and that of COD. QOL was significantly improved (+3.5/10) postoperatively for both STIP and SLaser in both social and professional fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>By comparing QOL and hearing gain of STIP and SLaser, our results suggest that both surgical techniques are a safe and successful treatment for otosclerotic stapes fixation. Further studies aiming at comparing larger series may confirm and refine these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":"143 3","pages":"231-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2186482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The surgical treatment of otosclerosis consists of the replacement of the stapes using a piston.

Aims/objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the audiometric results and quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent surgery for otosclerosis by stapedectomy with fascia interposition (STIP) or by stapedotomy using CO2 laser (SLaser) without fascia interposition.

Material and methods: Ninety-one patients operated on for otosclerosis by STIP (40 patients) and by SLaser (51 patients) were included. Audiometric results were graphically displayed using the Amsterdam Hearing Evaluation Plot and were compared to the Common Otology Database (COD) comprising 660 patients. The patients' QOL was assessed with an otological validated survey. The significance level was p < .05.

Results: There was no significant difference in hearing improvement between SLaser and STIP-operated patients. There was no significant difference between our results and that of COD. QOL was significantly improved (+3.5/10) postoperatively for both STIP and SLaser in both social and professional fields.

Conclusions and significance: By comparing QOL and hearing gain of STIP and SLaser, our results suggest that both surgical techniques are a safe and successful treatment for otosclerotic stapes fixation. Further studies aiming at comparing larger series may confirm and refine these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳硬化:介入式镫骨切除术或无介入式CO2激光校准镫骨切除术后听力学结果和生活质量。
背景:耳硬化的外科治疗包括用活塞代替镫骨。目的/目的:本研究的目的是评估听力学结果和生活质量(QOL)的患者接受镫骨切除术合并筋膜间置(STIP)或镫骨切除术使用CO2激光(SLaser)无筋膜间置。材料与方法:91例耳硬化症患者采用STIP(40例)和SLaser(51例)手术治疗。使用阿姆斯特丹听力评估图以图形方式显示听力测量结果,并与包含660名患者的普通耳科数据库(COD)进行比较。通过耳科调查评估患者的生活质量。结果:SLaser手术与stip手术患者的听力改善无显著性差异。我们的结果与COD没有显著差异。STIP和SLaser在社会和专业领域的术后生活质量均有显著改善(+3.5/10)。结论和意义:通过比较STIP和SLaser的生活质量和听力增益,我们的结果表明这两种手术技术都是一种安全成功的治疗耳硬化性镫骨固定的方法。旨在比较更大系列的进一步研究可能会证实和完善这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: predictors of recurrence 5 years after surgery. Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1