Management of rectal injury and rectourinary fistula from radical prostatectomy.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-08 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_179_21
Nuttaphon Luchaichana, Patkawat Ramart
{"title":"Management of rectal injury and rectourinary fistula from radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Nuttaphon Luchaichana,&nbsp;Patkawat Ramart","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_179_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to demonstrate our management of rectal injury (RI) and rectourinary fistula (RUF) from radical prostatectomy (RP) and identify a possible factor that increased the chance of developing RUF.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and December 2019, a total of 14 cases of RI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all 14 cases of RI, the average age at RP was 66.3 years (54-77). During the study period, 8 of 14 cases of RI occurred in our hospital, and the incidence of RI was 0.42%. RI was intraoperative recognition in 8 cases and delayed diagnosis in 6 cases. For immediate recognition, 4 of 8 cases were primarily repaired without developing RUF and did not require diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. RUF occurred in 10 cases including 4 cases of intraoperative recognition and all cases of delayed diagnosis. In a subgroup analysis of RI that occurred in our hospital, the timing for diagnosis was clinically and statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.029). Instantly detected RI during RP and intraoperative rectal repair resulted in no postoperative complication. Among all 10 cases of RUF, 5 cases were successfully repaired by modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition. No major complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incidence of RI was 0.42% and intraoperative recognition of RI was a key to prevent the development of RUF. Modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition was an effective treatment for RUF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"15 1","pages":"31-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/a4/UA-15-31.PMC10062513.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_179_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate our management of rectal injury (RI) and rectourinary fistula (RUF) from radical prostatectomy (RP) and identify a possible factor that increased the chance of developing RUF.

Materials and methods: Between January 2011 and December 2019, a total of 14 cases of RI were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed, including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information.

Results: In all 14 cases of RI, the average age at RP was 66.3 years (54-77). During the study period, 8 of 14 cases of RI occurred in our hospital, and the incidence of RI was 0.42%. RI was intraoperative recognition in 8 cases and delayed diagnosis in 6 cases. For immediate recognition, 4 of 8 cases were primarily repaired without developing RUF and did not require diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. RUF occurred in 10 cases including 4 cases of intraoperative recognition and all cases of delayed diagnosis. In a subgroup analysis of RI that occurred in our hospital, the timing for diagnosis was clinically and statistically significant difference (P = 0.029). Instantly detected RI during RP and intraoperative rectal repair resulted in no postoperative complication. Among all 10 cases of RUF, 5 cases were successfully repaired by modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition. No major complications were reported.

Conclusions: Incidence of RI was 0.42% and intraoperative recognition of RI was a key to prevent the development of RUF. Modified York-Mason procedure with dartos tissue flap interposition was an effective treatment for RUF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性前列腺切除术后直肠损伤和直肠尿瘘的治疗。
目的:本研究旨在证明我们对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)引起的直肠损伤(RI)和直肠尿瘘(RUF)的处理,并确定增加发生RUF机会的可能因素。材料和方法:2011年1月至2019年12月,共回顾性分析了14例RI病例,包括术前、围手术期、,以及术后信息。结果:在所有14例RI中,RP的平均年龄为66.3岁(54-77岁)。在研究期间,14例RI中有8例发生在我院,RI的发生率为0.42%。8例RI为术中识别,6例延迟诊断。为了立即识别,8例病例中有4例在没有发生联阵的情况下进行了初步修复,并且不需要进行结肠造口术和耻骨上膀胱造口术。联阵发生10例,包括4例术中识别和所有延迟诊断病例。在我院发生的RI亚组分析中,诊断时间在临床和统计学上有显著差异(P=0.029)。在RP和术中直肠修复过程中即时检测到RI,无术后并发症。在全部10例联阵病例中,5例采用改良York-Mason手术并插入dartos组织瓣成功修复。没有重大并发症的报告。结论:RI的发生率为0.42%,术中对RI的识别是预防联阵发展的关键。改良York-Mason手术加dartos组织瓣是治疗联阵的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus: Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients. Survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review. Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study. Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1