Tianyu Zhang, Haiyi Ren, Mohammed Shokr, Fengming Hui, Xiao Cheng
{"title":"Bibliometric analysis of studies of the Arctic and Antarctic polynya.","authors":"Tianyu Zhang, Haiyi Ren, Mohammed Shokr, Fengming Hui, Xiao Cheng","doi":"10.3389/frma.2023.1100845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the polar polynya-related 1,677 publications derived from the Web of Science from 1980 to 2021, this study analyses the scientific performance of polar polynya research with respect to publication outputs, scientific categories, journals, productive countries and partnerships, co-cited references, bibliographic documents and the thermal trends of keywords. The number of publications and citations on polar polynya has increased 17.28 and 11.22% annually since the 1990s, respectively, and those numbers for Antarctic polynya have surpassed that of the Arctic polynya since 2014. Oceanography, geosciences multidisciplinary, and environmental sciences were the top 3 scientific categories in the Arctic and Antarctic polynya research field. Nevertheless, ecology and meteorology are gaining ground in the Arctic and the Antarctic recently. The Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans accommodated most publications for both polar regions, followed by Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography and Polar Biology. The Continental Shelf Research and Ocean Modeling were favored journals in Arctic and Antarctic polynya research, respectively. The USA dominated the polar polynya study field with 31.74%/43.60% publications on the Arctic/Antarctic polynya research, followed by Canada (40.23%/4.32%) and Germany (17.21%/11.22%). Besides, Australia occupied the second most popular position in the Antarctic polynya research. The keywords analysis concluded that the polynya topics that generated the most interest were altered from model to climate change in the Arctic and ocean water and glacier in the Antarctic over time. This study gives a summary of the polar polynya scientific field through bibliometric analysis which may provide reference for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061148/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1100845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Based on the polar polynya-related 1,677 publications derived from the Web of Science from 1980 to 2021, this study analyses the scientific performance of polar polynya research with respect to publication outputs, scientific categories, journals, productive countries and partnerships, co-cited references, bibliographic documents and the thermal trends of keywords. The number of publications and citations on polar polynya has increased 17.28 and 11.22% annually since the 1990s, respectively, and those numbers for Antarctic polynya have surpassed that of the Arctic polynya since 2014. Oceanography, geosciences multidisciplinary, and environmental sciences were the top 3 scientific categories in the Arctic and Antarctic polynya research field. Nevertheless, ecology and meteorology are gaining ground in the Arctic and the Antarctic recently. The Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans accommodated most publications for both polar regions, followed by Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography and Polar Biology. The Continental Shelf Research and Ocean Modeling were favored journals in Arctic and Antarctic polynya research, respectively. The USA dominated the polar polynya study field with 31.74%/43.60% publications on the Arctic/Antarctic polynya research, followed by Canada (40.23%/4.32%) and Germany (17.21%/11.22%). Besides, Australia occupied the second most popular position in the Antarctic polynya research. The keywords analysis concluded that the polynya topics that generated the most interest were altered from model to climate change in the Arctic and ocean water and glacier in the Antarctic over time. This study gives a summary of the polar polynya scientific field through bibliometric analysis which may provide reference for future research.
基于1980 - 2021年Web of Science上的1677篇与极地冰原相关的论文,从论文产出、科学类别、期刊、生产国和合作伙伴、共同被引文献、参考文献和关键词热趋势等方面分析了极地冰原研究的科学绩效。自20世纪90年代以来,极地冰槽的出版物和引用数分别以年均17.28%和11.22%的速度增长,2014年以来,南极冰槽的出版物和引用数超过了北极冰槽。海洋学、地球科学多学科和环境科学是北极和南极冰湖研究领域的前3个科学类别。尽管如此,生态学和气象学最近在北极和南极取得了进展。《地球物理研究-海洋》杂志收录了大部分关于两极地区的出版物,其次是《深海研究第二部分-海洋学和极地生物学的专题研究》。《大陆架研究》和《海洋模拟》分别是北极和南极冰湖研究的热门期刊。美国以31.74%/43.60%的北极/南极冰盆研究出版物占据极地冰盆研究领域的主导地位,其次是加拿大(40.23%/4.32%)和德国(17.21%/11.22%)。此外,澳大利亚在南极冰湖研究中占据了第二受欢迎的位置。关键词分析得出的结论是,随着时间的推移,引起人们最感兴趣的多冰区主题从模式转变为北极、海水和南极冰川的气候变化。本文通过文献计量学分析对极地冰湖科学领域进行了总结,为今后的研究提供参考。