[Personalized treatment options for spinal muscular atrophy].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.18071/isz.76.0077
Katalin Szabó-Taylor, Judit Mária Molnár
{"title":"[Personalized treatment options for spinal muscular atrophy].","authors":"Katalin Szabó-Taylor,&nbsp;Judit Mária Molnár","doi":"10.18071/isz.76.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease leading to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, in severe cases also affecting the bulbar and respiratory muscles.The clinical spectrum of the disease is extremely variable, in the most severe cases resulting in perinatal death, while at the least severe end of the spectrum causing some motor deficits in old age without the loss of ambulation. Spinal muscular atrophy care has changed dramatically in recent years due to the availability of new therapeutic options.&nbsp;<br>The FDA approved nusinersen in 2016, this was followed by the approval of onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2019 and risdiplam in 2020. The EMA approved all three therapies a year later. Two of the threapies work at the pre-mRNA level, one at the DNA level. The clinical studies leading to the approval of the three drugs included patients of different ages and clinical conditions, and utilised partly different motor and functional scales. Therefore, direct comparison of these clinical studies is not possible. However, an increasing amount of real-world data contribute to the better understanding of the efficacy of the different therapies for patients of different ages and clinical conditions, in a real-world setting. Thus, the question may arise &ldquo;Which is the best SMA therapy?&rdquo;. This is an impossible question to answer. Indeed the question &ldquo;Which therapy is the most suitable for a certain patient at a certain time?&rdquo; is much more realistic. Here, we provide a brief overview of the objectively measurable results of the three therapies to date and an outlook into future therapeutic avenues.&nbsp;</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease leading to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, in severe cases also affecting the bulbar and respiratory muscles.The clinical spectrum of the disease is extremely variable, in the most severe cases resulting in perinatal death, while at the least severe end of the spectrum causing some motor deficits in old age without the loss of ambulation. Spinal muscular atrophy care has changed dramatically in recent years due to the availability of new therapeutic options. 
The FDA approved nusinersen in 2016, this was followed by the approval of onasemnogene abeparvovec in 2019 and risdiplam in 2020. The EMA approved all three therapies a year later. Two of the threapies work at the pre-mRNA level, one at the DNA level. The clinical studies leading to the approval of the three drugs included patients of different ages and clinical conditions, and utilised partly different motor and functional scales. Therefore, direct comparison of these clinical studies is not possible. However, an increasing amount of real-world data contribute to the better understanding of the efficacy of the different therapies for patients of different ages and clinical conditions, in a real-world setting. Thus, the question may arise “Which is the best SMA therapy?”. This is an impossible question to answer. Indeed the question “Which therapy is the most suitable for a certain patient at a certain time?” is much more realistic. Here, we provide a brief overview of the objectively measurable results of the three therapies to date and an outlook into future therapeutic avenues. 

.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[脊髓性肌萎缩症的个性化治疗方案]。
脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)是一种常染色体隐性疾病,可导致进行性肌肉无力和萎缩,严重时还会影响球肌和呼吸肌。该疾病的临床谱变化很大,最严重的病例会导致围产期死亡,而最不严重的谱则会在老年时导致一些运动缺陷,但不会丧失行走能力。近年来,由于新的治疗选择的出现,脊髓性肌萎缩症的治疗发生了巨大变化。FDA于2016年批准了nusinersen,随后于2019年批准了onasemnogene abeparvovec,并于2020年批准了risdiplam。一年后,EMA批准了这三种疗法。其中两种疗法在mrna前水平起作用,一种在DNA水平起作用。导致这三种药物获批的临床研究包括不同年龄和临床状况的患者,并且使用了部分不同的运动和功能量表。因此,不可能对这些临床研究进行直接比较。然而,越来越多的真实世界数据有助于更好地了解不同治疗方法对不同年龄和临床状况患者的疗效。因此,可能会出现这样的问题:哪一种SMA疗法是最好的?这是一个不可能回答的问题。事实上,在特定的时间,哪种治疗方法最适合特定的病人?更加现实。在这里,我们简要概述了迄今为止三种疗法的客观可测量结果,并展望了未来的治疗途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
[Combined epilepsy with generalized and focal seizures]. [Quality of life in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with recanalisation]. Effect of inflammatory response before mechanical thrombectomy on prognosis in stroke patients. Evaluating vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Meniere's disease: Insights from cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and video head impulse test. Predictors of pneumonia in stroke patients with dysphagia: A Turkish study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1