Melinda Jiang, Antoinette Lam, Lydia Lam, Joshua Kovoor, Joshua Inglis, Sepehr Shakib, William Smith, Amal Abou-Hamden, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and the potential for perioperative delabeling of penicillin allergies for neurosurgery inpatients.","authors":"Melinda Jiang, Antoinette Lam, Lydia Lam, Joshua Kovoor, Joshua Inglis, Sepehr Shakib, William Smith, Amal Abou-Hamden, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2173724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the article: </strong>Patients with penicillin allergy labels are more likely to have postoperative wound infections. When penicillin allergy labels are interrogated, a significant number of individuals do not have penicillin allergies and may be delabeled. This study was conducted to gain preliminary evidence into the potential role of artificial intelligence in assisting with perioperative penicillin adverse reaction (AR) evaluation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-centre retrospective cohort study of consecutive emergency and elective neurosurgery admissions was conducted over a two-year period. Previously derived artificial intelligence algorithms for the classification of penicillin AR were applied to the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2063 individual admissions included in the study. The number of individuals with penicillin allergy labels was 124; one patient had a penicillin intolerance label. Of these labels, 22.4% were not consistent with classifications using expert criteria. When the artificial intelligence algorithm was applied to the cohort, the algorithm maintained a high level of classification performance (classification accuracy 98.1% for allergy versus intolerance classification).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Penicillin allergy labels are common among neurosurgery inpatients. Artificial intelligence can accurately classify penicillin AR in this cohort, and may assist in identifying patients suitable for delabeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"40-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2173724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the article: Patients with penicillin allergy labels are more likely to have postoperative wound infections. When penicillin allergy labels are interrogated, a significant number of individuals do not have penicillin allergies and may be delabeled. This study was conducted to gain preliminary evidence into the potential role of artificial intelligence in assisting with perioperative penicillin adverse reaction (AR) evaluation.
Material and methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study of consecutive emergency and elective neurosurgery admissions was conducted over a two-year period. Previously derived artificial intelligence algorithms for the classification of penicillin AR were applied to the data.
Results: There were 2063 individual admissions included in the study. The number of individuals with penicillin allergy labels was 124; one patient had a penicillin intolerance label. Of these labels, 22.4% were not consistent with classifications using expert criteria. When the artificial intelligence algorithm was applied to the cohort, the algorithm maintained a high level of classification performance (classification accuracy 98.1% for allergy versus intolerance classification).
Conclusions: Penicillin allergy labels are common among neurosurgery inpatients. Artificial intelligence can accurately classify penicillin AR in this cohort, and may assist in identifying patients suitable for delabeling.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.