The Prognostic Value of Previous Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Revascularization Surgery.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1570161120666220926102044
Jose Manuel Villaescusa-Catalan, Jorge Rodríguez-Capitán, Cristina Isabel Sanz-Sánchez, Gemma Sánchez-Espín, José Luis Guerrero-Orriach, Francisco Javier Pavón Morón, Lourdes Fernández-Romero, José María Melero-Tejedor, Miguel Such-Martínez, Carlos Porras-Martín, Manuel Jiménez-Navarro
{"title":"The Prognostic Value of Previous Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Revascularization Surgery.","authors":"Jose Manuel Villaescusa-Catalan,&nbsp;Jorge Rodríguez-Capitán,&nbsp;Cristina Isabel Sanz-Sánchez,&nbsp;Gemma Sánchez-Espín,&nbsp;José Luis Guerrero-Orriach,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Pavón Morón,&nbsp;Lourdes Fernández-Romero,&nbsp;José María Melero-Tejedor,&nbsp;Miguel Such-Martínez,&nbsp;Carlos Porras-Martín,&nbsp;Manuel Jiménez-Navarro","doi":"10.2174/1570161120666220926102044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, studies are underway to determine whether coronary stent implantation with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty before a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) influences the prognosis of surgery. This study aimed to assess the need for future revascularisation or all-cause mortality as a composite endpoint after CABG surgery among patients with previous stent implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, non-randomised study was performed on 721 patients who underwent CABGin our centre between 2012 and 2017. This single-centre study compared two groups: 1) the previous stent group, patients with previous stent implantation (n=144), and 2) the non-previous stent group, patients without previous stent implantation (n=577).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 36 months, the previous stent group presented a decreased combined event-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years compared with the non-previous stent group (67.4, 43.5 and 23.0% vs. 91.0, 80.3 and 63.0%, respectively; p<0.01). There was also higher mortality in the previous stent group than in the non-previous stent group (96.1, 90.5 and 79.4 vs. 91.9, 75.9 and 51.0, respectively; p=0.01). The multivariable analysis of demographics, baseline comorbidity and surgical data showed previous stent implantation as an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (Hazard Ratio=3.00 and 95% confident interval=2.09-4.32; p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with percutaneous coronary intervention before CABG present higher comorbidities and clinical events during follow-up than those who do not undergo stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1570161120666220926102044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, studies are underway to determine whether coronary stent implantation with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty before a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) influences the prognosis of surgery. This study aimed to assess the need for future revascularisation or all-cause mortality as a composite endpoint after CABG surgery among patients with previous stent implantation.

Methods: A retrospective, non-randomised study was performed on 721 patients who underwent CABGin our centre between 2012 and 2017. This single-centre study compared two groups: 1) the previous stent group, patients with previous stent implantation (n=144), and 2) the non-previous stent group, patients without previous stent implantation (n=577).

Results: After a median follow-up of 36 months, the previous stent group presented a decreased combined event-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years compared with the non-previous stent group (67.4, 43.5 and 23.0% vs. 91.0, 80.3 and 63.0%, respectively; p<0.01). There was also higher mortality in the previous stent group than in the non-previous stent group (96.1, 90.5 and 79.4 vs. 91.9, 75.9 and 51.0, respectively; p=0.01). The multivariable analysis of demographics, baseline comorbidity and surgical data showed previous stent implantation as an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (Hazard Ratio=3.00 and 95% confident interval=2.09-4.32; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Patients with percutaneous coronary intervention before CABG present higher comorbidities and clinical events during follow-up than those who do not undergo stenting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往冠脉支架置入术对心肌血管重建术患者的预后价值。
背景:目前,研究正在确定冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)前经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术是否影响手术预后。本研究旨在评估既往支架植入术患者冠脉搭桥术后对未来血运重建的需求或全因死亡率作为复合终点。方法:对2012年至2017年在本中心接受cabi治疗的721例患者进行回顾性、非随机研究。这项单中心研究比较了两组:1)既往支架组,既往支架植入患者(n=144); 2)未既往支架组,既往未支架植入患者(n=577)。结果:中位随访36个月后,与未使用支架组相比,使用支架组在1年、3年和5年的联合无事件生存率下降(分别为67.4、43.5和23.0% vs 91.0、80.3和63.0%);结论:冠脉搭桥前行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者在随访中比未行支架置入的患者存在更高的合并症和临床事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1