Impact of automated drug dispensing system on patient safety.

IF 2.4 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Practice-Granada Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-11 DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2744
Majed Falah Alanazi, Majed Ibrahim Shahein, Hamad Mohammed Alsharif, Saif Mohammed Alotaibi, Abdulsalam Owaidh Alanazi, Ahmed Obaidallah Alanazi, Umar Abdolah Alharbe, Hanad S S Almfalh, Palanisamy Amirthalingam, Ahmed Mohsen Hamdan, Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, Shahul Hameed Pakkir Mohamed, Mostafa A Sayed Ali
{"title":"Impact of automated drug dispensing system on patient safety.","authors":"Majed Falah Alanazi,&nbsp;Majed Ibrahim Shahein,&nbsp;Hamad Mohammed Alsharif,&nbsp;Saif Mohammed Alotaibi,&nbsp;Abdulsalam Owaidh Alanazi,&nbsp;Ahmed Obaidallah Alanazi,&nbsp;Umar Abdolah Alharbe,&nbsp;Hanad S S Almfalh,&nbsp;Palanisamy Amirthalingam,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohsen Hamdan,&nbsp;Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani,&nbsp;Shahul Hameed Pakkir Mohamed,&nbsp;Mostafa A Sayed Ali","doi":"10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Automated drug dispensing system (ADDs) is an emerging technology positively impacts drug dispensing efficiency by minimizing medication errors. However, the pharmacist perception of the impact of ADDs on patient safety is not well-established. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to evaluate the dispensing practice and pharmacist perception of ADDs towards patient safety through a validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-designed questionnaire was validated and the pharmacist perception of dispensing practice was compared between two hospitals adopting ADDs and traditional drug dispensing system (TDDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The developed questionnaire had an excellent internal consistency (both Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients were >0.9). Factor analysis retained three significant factors (subscales) that explained pharmacist perception of dispensing system, dispensing practice, and patient counseling (p<0.001 for each factor). The average number of prescriptions dispensed per day, drugs contained in each prescription, average time for labeling each prescription and inventory management were significantly varied between ADDs and TDDs (p=0.027, 0.013 0.044 and 0.004, respectively). The perception of pharmacists using ADDs on three domains were higher than the TDDs. The pharmacists in ADDs agreed that they had enough time to review the medications before dispensing than TDDs and this difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADDs was highly effective in improving dispensing practice and medication review; however, the pharmacists need to emphasize the importance of ADDs to translate the pharmacists' freed-time towards patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51762,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","volume":"20 4","pages":"2744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0f/2e/pharmpract-20-2744.PMC9891784.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice-Granada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2022.4.2744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Automated drug dispensing system (ADDs) is an emerging technology positively impacts drug dispensing efficiency by minimizing medication errors. However, the pharmacist perception of the impact of ADDs on patient safety is not well-established. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to evaluate the dispensing practice and pharmacist perception of ADDs towards patient safety through a validated questionnaire.

Methods: A self-designed questionnaire was validated and the pharmacist perception of dispensing practice was compared between two hospitals adopting ADDs and traditional drug dispensing system (TDDs).

Results: The developed questionnaire had an excellent internal consistency (both Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients were >0.9). Factor analysis retained three significant factors (subscales) that explained pharmacist perception of dispensing system, dispensing practice, and patient counseling (p<0.001 for each factor). The average number of prescriptions dispensed per day, drugs contained in each prescription, average time for labeling each prescription and inventory management were significantly varied between ADDs and TDDs (p=0.027, 0.013 0.044 and 0.004, respectively). The perception of pharmacists using ADDs on three domains were higher than the TDDs. The pharmacists in ADDs agreed that they had enough time to review the medications before dispensing than TDDs and this difference was found to be statistically significant (p=0.028).

Conclusions: ADDs was highly effective in improving dispensing practice and medication review; however, the pharmacists need to emphasize the importance of ADDs to translate the pharmacists' freed-time towards patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动配药系统对患者安全的影响。
目的:自动配药系统(ADDs)是一种新兴技术,通过最大限度地减少药物错误,对配药效率产生积极影响。然而,药剂师对ADDs对患者安全的影响的看法并不明确。这项横断面观察性研究旨在通过一份经过验证的问卷来评估ADDs的配药实践和药剂师对患者安全的看法。方法:对自行设计的调查表进行验证,并比较采用ADDs和传统配药系统(TDD)的两家医院药剂师对配药实践的感知。结果:所编制的调查表具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbachα和McDonaldω系数均>0.9)。因子分析保留了三个显著因素(分量表),解释了药剂师对配药系统、配药实践和患者咨询的看法(P结论:ADDs在改善配药实践和药物审查方面非常有效;然而,药剂师需要强调ADDs的重要性,以将药剂师的空闲时间转化为患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Practice-Granada
Pharmacy Practice-Granada PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Practice is a free full-text peer-reviewed journal with a scope on pharmacy practice. Pharmacy Practice is published quarterly. Pharmacy Practice does not charge and will never charge any publication fee or article processing charge (APC) to the authors. The current and future absence of any article processing charges (APCs) is signed in the MoU with the Center for Pharmacy Practice Innovation (CPPI) at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. Pharmacy Practice is the consequence of the efforts of a number of colleagues from different Universities who belief in collaborative publishing: no one pays, no one receives. Although focusing on the practice of pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice covers a wide range of pharmacy activities, among them and not being comprehensive, clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, social pharmacy, pharmacy education, process and outcome research, health promotion and education, health informatics, pharmacoepidemiology, etc.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of a mental health literacy questionnaire for university students in Indonesia Mini review: The clinical avenues of combined hydralazine-nitrate in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Pharmacy licensees and their characters that affect Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) Compliance Factors related to non-adherence to antiretroviral treatment in children under 13 years of age Pattern of drug therapy related problems encountered by clinical pharmacists in a critical care setting in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1