Yield of diagnosis and risk of stroke with screening strategies for atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review of current evidence.

Bernadette Corica, Niccolò Bonini, Jacopo Francesco Imberti, Giulio Francesco Romiti, Marco Vitolo, Lisa Attanasio, Stefania Basili, Ben Freedman, Tatjana S Potpara, Giuseppe Boriani, Gregory Y H Lip, Marco Proietti
{"title":"Yield of diagnosis and risk of stroke with screening strategies for atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review of current evidence.","authors":"Bernadette Corica,&nbsp;Niccolò Bonini,&nbsp;Jacopo Francesco Imberti,&nbsp;Giulio Francesco Romiti,&nbsp;Marco Vitolo,&nbsp;Lisa Attanasio,&nbsp;Stefania Basili,&nbsp;Ben Freedman,&nbsp;Tatjana S Potpara,&nbsp;Giuseppe Boriani,&nbsp;Gregory Y H Lip,&nbsp;Marco Proietti","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide. The presence of AF is associated with increased risk of systemic thromboembolism, but with the uptake of oral anticoagulant (OAC) and implementation of a holistic and integrated care management, this risk is substantially reduced. The diagnosis of AF requires a 30-s-long electrocardiographic (ECG) trace, irrespective of the presence of symptoms, which may represent the main indication for an ECG tracing. However, almost half patients are asymptomatic at the time of incidental AF diagnosis, with similar risk of stroke of those with clinical AF. This has led to a crucial role of screening for AF, to increase the diagnosis of population at risk of clinical events. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview about the epidemiology of asymptomatic AF, the different screening technologies, the yield of diagnosis in asymptomatic population, and the benefit derived from screening in terms of reduction of clinical adverse events, such as stroke, cardiovascular, and all-cause death. We aim to underline the importance of implementing AF screening programmes and reporting about the debate between scientific societies' clinical guidelines recommendations and the concerns expressed by the regulatory authorities, which still do not recommend population-wide screening. This review summarizes data on the ongoing trials specifically designed to investigate the benefit of screening in terms of risk of adverse events which will further elucidate the importance of screening in reducing risk of outcomes and influence and inform clinical practice in the next future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/04/oead031.PMC10083691.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide. The presence of AF is associated with increased risk of systemic thromboembolism, but with the uptake of oral anticoagulant (OAC) and implementation of a holistic and integrated care management, this risk is substantially reduced. The diagnosis of AF requires a 30-s-long electrocardiographic (ECG) trace, irrespective of the presence of symptoms, which may represent the main indication for an ECG tracing. However, almost half patients are asymptomatic at the time of incidental AF diagnosis, with similar risk of stroke of those with clinical AF. This has led to a crucial role of screening for AF, to increase the diagnosis of population at risk of clinical events. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview about the epidemiology of asymptomatic AF, the different screening technologies, the yield of diagnosis in asymptomatic population, and the benefit derived from screening in terms of reduction of clinical adverse events, such as stroke, cardiovascular, and all-cause death. We aim to underline the importance of implementing AF screening programmes and reporting about the debate between scientific societies' clinical guidelines recommendations and the concerns expressed by the regulatory authorities, which still do not recommend population-wide screening. This review summarizes data on the ongoing trials specifically designed to investigate the benefit of screening in terms of risk of adverse events which will further elucidate the importance of screening in reducing risk of outcomes and influence and inform clinical practice in the next future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房颤筛查策略的诊断和卒中风险:对现有证据的全面回顾。
心房颤动(AF)是世界上最常见的心律失常。房颤的存在与全体性血栓栓塞的风险增加有关,但口服抗凝剂(OAC)的摄入和全面综合护理管理的实施,这种风险大大降低。AF的诊断需要30秒长的心电图(ECG)追踪,而不考虑症状的存在,这可能是心电图追踪的主要指征。然而,几乎一半的患者在偶发房颤诊断时是无症状的,其卒中风险与临床房颤患者相似。这使得房颤筛查具有至关重要的作用,可以增加临床事件风险人群的诊断率。本综述的目的是全面概述无症状房颤的流行病学、不同的筛查技术、无症状人群的诊断率,以及筛查在减少临床不良事件(如卒中、心血管疾病和全因死亡)方面的益处。我们的目的是强调实施房颤筛查计划的重要性,并报道科学学会的临床指南建议与监管当局表达的担忧之间的争论,后者仍然不建议进行全民筛查。本综述总结了正在进行的专门研究筛查在不良事件风险方面的益处的试验的数据,这将进一步阐明筛查在降低结果风险方面的重要性,并影响和告知未来的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes of intracardiac flow dynamics measured by HyperDoppler in patients with aortic stenosis Development of a Small Animal Model Replicating Core Characteristics of Takotsubo Syndrome in Humans Elastin turnover in Williams Beuren and 7q11.23 microduplication syndromes Myeloid-specific interleukin-6 response: from vascular effects to the potential for novel personalized medicines Myeloid cell derived Interleukin-6 induces vascular dysfunction and vascular and systemic inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1