Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1759772
Amir H Sohail, Jeffrey Silverstein, Hazim Hakmi, Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco, Yousaf B Hadi, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Muhammad Aziz, Hana Ajouz, David Shin
{"title":"Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the Marionette Transumbilical Approach Is Safe and Efficient with Careful Patient Selection: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Amir H Sohail,&nbsp;Jeffrey Silverstein,&nbsp;Hazim Hakmi,&nbsp;Tulio Brasileiro Silva Pacheco,&nbsp;Yousaf B Hadi,&nbsp;Manesh Kumar Gangwani,&nbsp;Muhammad Aziz,&nbsp;Hana Ajouz,&nbsp;David Shin","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1759772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  The \"marionette technique\" for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. <b>Methods</b>  A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. <b>Results</b>  M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, <i>p</i> -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, <i>p</i> -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02-2.39). <b>Conclusion</b>  With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. <b>Level of evidence</b>  Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":74891,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"9 1","pages":"e13-e17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10085643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives  The "marionette technique" for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (m-TLC) offers improved cosmesis and possibly shorter postoperative recovery for patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the four-port conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). We compared the outcomes of m-TLC and CLC at a tertiary care facility in New York. Methods  A retrospective chart review was conducted and data on patients who underwent m-TLC and CLC were retrieved. Hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, and complications were compared between the two groups using linear and logistic regression, as appropriate. Results  M-TLC group patients were significantly younger, predominantly females with lower body mass index. They were less likely to have previous abdominal surgery and more likely to have noninflammatory pathology ( p  < 0.05 for all). Nonadjusted LOS (1 vs. 3 days, p -value < 0.0001) and operative time (50 vs. 56 minutes, p -value = 0.007) were significantly lower among patients who underwent m-TLC; however, there was no significant difference on multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in the overall complication rate (odds ratio: 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.02-2.39). Conclusion  With careful patient selection, m-TLC offers better cosmesis with comparable safety outcomes. Level of evidence  Level III.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术采用牵线木偶经脐入路是安全有效的,患者选择谨慎:与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析。
目的:与四孔传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)相比,经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术(m-TLC)的“牵线木偶技术”为腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者提供了更好的美容和更短的术后恢复时间。我们比较了纽约一家三级医疗机构的m-TLC和CLC的结果。方法回顾性分析行m-TLC和CLC的患者资料。采用线性和逻辑回归对两组患者的住院时间(LOS)、手术时间和并发症进行比较。结果M-TLC组患者明显年轻化,以女性为主,体重指数较低。在接受m-TLC的患者中,既往腹部手术的可能性较低,非炎性病理的可能性较高(p -value p -value = 0.007);但多变量分析差异无统计学意义。在多因素分析中,两组患者的总并发症发生率无差异(优势比:1.63;95%置信区间为0.02-2.39)。结论通过谨慎的患者选择,m-TLC可提供更好的美容效果,且安全性相当。证据等级三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1