Electronic Health Literacy among Linguistically Diverse Patients in the Los Angeles County Safety Net Health System.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ethnicity & Disease Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18865/ed.32.1.21
Cristina Valdovinos, Giselle Perez-Aguilar, Roberto Gonzalez Huerta, Chesca Barrios, Griselda Gutierrez, Carmen Mendez, Anshu Abhat, Gerardo Moreno, Arleen Brown, Alejandra Casillas
{"title":"Electronic Health Literacy among Linguistically Diverse Patients in the Los Angeles County Safety Net Health System.","authors":"Cristina Valdovinos,&nbsp;Giselle Perez-Aguilar,&nbsp;Roberto Gonzalez Huerta,&nbsp;Chesca Barrios,&nbsp;Griselda Gutierrez,&nbsp;Carmen Mendez,&nbsp;Anshu Abhat,&nbsp;Gerardo Moreno,&nbsp;Arleen Brown,&nbsp;Alejandra Casillas","doi":"10.18865/ed.32.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic health (eHealth) literacy may affect telehealth uptake, yet few studies have evaluated eHealth literacy in underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to describe technology access and use patterns as well as eHealth literacy levels among English-speaking and LEP patients in a Los Angeles safety net health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients, aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, and their caregivers were recruited from three primary care safety-net clinics in Los Angeles County (California) between June - July 2017. Participants' electronic health literacy was assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); participants were also asked about technology access and use. We examined these measures in English-speaking and limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 participants (62 patients and 9 caregivers) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 56 years old. More than half of participants used a phone that could connect to the Internet (67%). The mean score for 10 eHEALS items was in the moderate range (26/50 points). There was no difference in mean eHEALS between language groups. However, 47% of Spanish-speaking participants \"agreed/strongly agreed\" that they knew how to use the Internet to answer their health questions, compared to 68% of English-speaking participants (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of patients from a diverse safety net population, perceived skills and confidence in engaging with electronic health systems were low, particularly among LEP Spanish-speakers, despite moderate levels of electronic health literacy. More studies are needed among diverse patient populations to better assess eHealth literacy and patients' digital readiness, and to examine how these patient metrics directly impact telehealth utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50495,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785863/pdf/ethndis-32-21.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.32.1.21","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Electronic health (eHealth) literacy may affect telehealth uptake, yet few studies have evaluated eHealth literacy in underserved populations.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe technology access and use patterns as well as eHealth literacy levels among English-speaking and LEP patients in a Los Angeles safety net health system.

Methods: Patients, aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, and their caregivers were recruited from three primary care safety-net clinics in Los Angeles County (California) between June - July 2017. Participants' electronic health literacy was assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); participants were also asked about technology access and use. We examined these measures in English-speaking and limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients.

Results: A total of 71 participants (62 patients and 9 caregivers) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 56 years old. More than half of participants used a phone that could connect to the Internet (67%). The mean score for 10 eHEALS items was in the moderate range (26/50 points). There was no difference in mean eHEALS between language groups. However, 47% of Spanish-speaking participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that they knew how to use the Internet to answer their health questions, compared to 68% of English-speaking participants (P<.05).

Conclusions: In this sample of patients from a diverse safety net population, perceived skills and confidence in engaging with electronic health systems were low, particularly among LEP Spanish-speakers, despite moderate levels of electronic health literacy. More studies are needed among diverse patient populations to better assess eHealth literacy and patients' digital readiness, and to examine how these patient metrics directly impact telehealth utilization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛杉矶县安全网健康系统中不同语言患者的电子健康素养。
背景:电子健康素养可能会影响远程医疗的普及,但很少有研究评估服务不足人群的电子健康素养。目的:本研究的目的是描述洛杉矶安全网卫生系统中英语和LEP患者的技术获取和使用模式以及电子健康素养水平。方法:2017年6月至7月从洛杉矶县(加利福尼亚州)的三个初级保健安全网诊所招募年龄≥18岁且诊断为糖尿病和/或高血压的患者及其护理人员。通过电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)评估参与者的电子健康素养;参与者还被问及技术的获取和使用。我们在说英语和有限英语熟练(LEP)说西班牙语的患者中检查了这些措施。结果:共有71名参与者(62名患者和9名护理人员)完成了问卷。受访者的平均年龄为56岁。超过一半的参与者(67%)使用可以连接到互联网的手机。10个eHEALS项目的平均得分处于中等范围(26/50分)。语言组之间的平均eHEALS没有差异。然而,47%说西班牙语的参与者“同意/强烈同意”他们知道如何使用互联网来回答他们的健康问题,相比之下,68%说英语的参与者(p结论:在这个来自不同安全网人口的患者样本中,尽管电子健康素养水平中等,但参与电子健康系统的感知技能和信心较低,特别是在LEP西班牙语使用者中。需要对不同的患者群体进行更多的研究,以更好地评估电子卫生素养和患者的数字准备情况,并检查这些患者指标如何直接影响远程卫生的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Disease
Ethnicity & Disease 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Disease is an international journal that exclusively publishes information on the causal and associative relationships in the etiology of common illnesses through the study of ethnic patterns of disease. Topics focus on: ethnic differentials in disease rates;impact of migration on health status; social and ethnic factors related to health care access and health; and metabolic epidemiology. A major priority of the journal is to provide a forum for exchange between the United States and the developing countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
期刊最新文献
Multilevel Determinants of Long COVID and Potential for Telehealth Intervention. Physical Activity Engagement among Black Immigrants and African American Adults in the 2010 to 2018 NHIS Study. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emotional Reactions to the Flint Water Crisis among Michigan Women in Communities Outside of Flint. Social Vulnerability May Underlie Racial Disparities in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Outcomes. Youth Perspectives on the Flint Water Crisis and Its Health Effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1