Specific Aspects of Eye Movement Reactions as Markers of Cognitive Control Disorders in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (Review).

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17691/stm2022.14.2.08
G M Khayrullina, V V Moiseeva, O V Martynova
{"title":"Specific Aspects of Eye Movement Reactions as Markers of Cognitive Control Disorders in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (Review).","authors":"G M Khayrullina,&nbsp;V V Moiseeva,&nbsp;O V Martynova","doi":"10.17691/stm2022.14.2.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple studies in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) became the basis for revealing selective attention, inhibitory control, and working memory impairments, which correlates with an imbalance in the activity of the cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuit associated with maintenance of cognitive control functions. Patients with OCD often demonstrate changes in the parameters of target-oriented eye movement reactions being a consequence of a possible impairment of the cognitive control neurophysiological framework. This review summarizes and analyzes data on cognitive control disorders in OCD obtained with eye movement recording techniques. It was established that the most often used are smooth pursuit eye movements tasks, memory-guided saccades, and anti-saccadic tasks. Data on smooth pursuit eye movements tasks and memory-guided saccades are contradictory, although they partially confirm selective attention and working memory impairment. Most studies on the anti-saccadic task identified impaired inhibitory control in patients with OCD. Similar disorders in form of increased latency and higher error rate in anti-saccades were also noted in the patients' first-degree relatives, which allows considering such disorders as manifestations of the endophenotype associated with the underlying risk of OCD. Future confirmation of these results in experiments using complex anti-saccadic tasks with images of various modalities (taking into account the increased anxiety in patients with OCD as the disorder basis) might contribute to validation of the OCD-specific markers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51886,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090922/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2022.14.2.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multiple studies in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) became the basis for revealing selective attention, inhibitory control, and working memory impairments, which correlates with an imbalance in the activity of the cortico-striatal-thalamic-cortical circuit associated with maintenance of cognitive control functions. Patients with OCD often demonstrate changes in the parameters of target-oriented eye movement reactions being a consequence of a possible impairment of the cognitive control neurophysiological framework. This review summarizes and analyzes data on cognitive control disorders in OCD obtained with eye movement recording techniques. It was established that the most often used are smooth pursuit eye movements tasks, memory-guided saccades, and anti-saccadic tasks. Data on smooth pursuit eye movements tasks and memory-guided saccades are contradictory, although they partially confirm selective attention and working memory impairment. Most studies on the anti-saccadic task identified impaired inhibitory control in patients with OCD. Similar disorders in form of increased latency and higher error rate in anti-saccades were also noted in the patients' first-degree relatives, which allows considering such disorders as manifestations of the endophenotype associated with the underlying risk of OCD. Future confirmation of these results in experiments using complex anti-saccadic tasks with images of various modalities (taking into account the increased anxiety in patients with OCD as the disorder basis) might contribute to validation of the OCD-specific markers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼动反应作为强迫症患者认知控制障碍标志物的具体方面(综述)。
对强迫症(OCD)患者的多项研究成为揭示选择性注意、抑制控制和工作记忆障碍的基础,这些障碍与维持认知控制功能相关的皮质-纹状体-丘脑-皮质回路活动的不平衡有关。强迫症患者经常表现出目标导向眼动反应参数的变化,这可能是认知控制神经生理框架受损的结果。本文综述并分析了眼动记录技术在强迫症认知控制障碍中的应用。研究证实,最常用的是眼球平滑追踪任务、记忆引导的扫视任务和反扫视任务。平滑追逐眼动任务和记忆引导扫视的数据是相互矛盾的,尽管它们部分证实了选择性注意和工作记忆障碍。大多数关于抗跳眼任务的研究发现强迫症患者的抑制性控制受损。在患者的一级亲属中也发现了以增加潜伏期和更高的抗扫视错误率形式出现的类似疾病,这允许将此类疾病视为与强迫症潜在风险相关的内表型表现。在未来的实验中,这些结果将通过使用不同模式的图像(考虑到强迫症患者焦虑的增加作为障碍基础)进行复杂的抗跳眼任务来证实,这可能有助于强迫症特异性标记的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine
Sovremennye Tehnologii v Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Sphingomyelins of Local Fat Depots and Blood Serum as Promising Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Diseases Neurogenetics of Brain Connectivity: Current Approaches to the Study (Review) Brain–Computer Interfaces with Intracortical Implants for Motor and Communication Functions Compensation: Review of Recent Developments Evaluation of the Feasibility of Using Commercial Wound Coatings as a Carrier Matrix for Bacteriophages Performance of the Models Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Predictors in Categorical and Continuous Forms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1