Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1002/jhbs.22237
Jakub Mlynář
{"title":"Harold Garfinkel and Edward Rose in the early years of ethnomethodology","authors":"Jakub Mlynář","doi":"10.1002/jhbs.22237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno-inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.22237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article documents the beginning of the intellectual companionship between the founder of ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel, and Edward Rose, who is most often associated with his program of “ethno-inquiries.” I present results from archival research focusing on the contacts and collaborations between Rose and Garfinkel in the years 1955–1965. First, I describe the review process for Rose and Felton's paper, submitted to the American Sociological Review in 1955, which Garfinkel reviewed and after Rose's rebuttal recommended for publication. The paper induced Garfinkel to write an extensive commentary that has remained unpublished. Second, I discuss the 1958 New Mexico conference sponsored by the Air Force, which was an opportunity for Rose and Garfinkel to work together on topics related to common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge. Third, I give an overview of the ethnomethodological conferences in 1962 and 1963, supported by an Air Force grant written collaboratively by Rose and Garfinkel. Here I focus primarily on Rose's research on “small languages,” which stimulated many discussions among the early ethnomethodologists. Rose's work and exchanges with Garfinkel demonstrate the former's affinity for miniaturization as a research approach and search for ways to empiricize topics of sociological theory in locally observable settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈罗德·加芬克尔和爱德华·罗斯在民族方法学的早期
这篇文章记录了民族方法学的创始人哈罗德·加芬克尔和爱德华·罗斯之间的智力伙伴关系的开始,爱德华·罗斯最常与他的“种族调查”计划联系在一起。我将介绍档案研究的结果,重点关注Rose和Garfinkel在1955-1965年间的接触和合作。首先,我描述了罗斯和费尔顿在1955年提交给《美国社会学评论》(American Sociological review)的论文的审查过程,加芬克尔对其进行了审查,在罗斯反驳后建议发表。这篇论文促使加芬克尔写了一篇长篇评论,但至今未发表。其次,我讨论了1958年由空军主办的新墨西哥会议,这是罗斯和加芬克尔在与常识知识和科学知识相关的主题上共同努力的机会。第三,我概述了1962年和1963年的民族方法学会议,这些会议是由罗斯和加芬克尔共同撰写的空军拨款支持的。在这里,我主要关注罗斯对“小语言”的研究,它激发了早期民族计分学家之间的许多讨论。Rose的工作和与Garfinkel的交流表明前者对小型化作为一种研究方法的亲和力,并寻求在局部可观察环境中经验化社会学理论主题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to the scientific, technical, institutional, and cultural history of the social and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes research articles, book reviews, and news and notes that cover the development of the core disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, economics, linguistics, communications, political science, and the neurosciences. The journal also welcomes papers and book reviews in related fields, particularly the history of science and medicine, historical theory, and historiography.
期刊最新文献
The reeducation of race: Jewishness and the politics of antiracism in postcolonial thought By Sonali Thakkar, Stanford University Press. 2024. pp. 288. $30.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9781503636446 “It's a fight – the whole personality of the patient to win.” The development of concepts of psychosis in the Jewish Hospital in Warsaw, 1898–1943 An epistemology of empathy and modern methods of social research: Intimations of the mind and early Chicago sociology Laying the foundations of independent psychology: The formation of modern psychology volume 1 Csaba Pléh. Routledge. 2024. pp. 516. $59.99 (paper). ISBN: 978-1-032-50276-2 The brain abstracted: Simplification in the history and philosophy of neuroscience By Mazviita Chirimuuta: MIT Press. 2024. pp. 364. $50.00 (paper). ISBN 978-0-2625-4804-5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1