Different antibody responses between liver and kidney transplant recipients elicited by third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

So Yun Lim, Young-In Yoon, Ji Yeun Kim, Eunyoung Tak, Hyunwook Kwon, Sung Shin, Young Hoon Kim, Gi-Won Song, Sung-Han Kim, Sung-Gyu Lee
{"title":"Different antibody responses between liver and kidney transplant recipients elicited by third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.","authors":"So Yun Lim,&nbsp;Young-In Yoon,&nbsp;Ji Yeun Kim,&nbsp;Eunyoung Tak,&nbsp;Hyunwook Kwon,&nbsp;Sung Shin,&nbsp;Young Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Gi-Won Song,&nbsp;Sung-Han Kim,&nbsp;Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.4285/kjt.22.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit decreased antibody responses, mainly due to their weakened immune systems. However, data are limited on antibody responses after the primary series of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among recipients of various solid organ transplant types. Thus, we compared the antibody responses after three COVID-19 vaccine doses between liver transplant (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled solid organ transplant recipients who received three COVID-19 vaccine doses from June 2021 to February 2022 and measured S1-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six LT and 17 KT recipients were included in the final analysis. KT recipients showed consistently lower antibody responses even after the third vaccine dose (86.2% vs. 52.9%, P=0.008) and lower antibody titers (median, 423.0 IU/mL [interquartile range, 99.6-2,057 IU/mL] vs. 19.7 IU/mL [interquartile range, 6.9-339.4 IU/mL]; P=0.006) than were observed in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid was a significant risk factor for a seropositive antibody response after the third vaccine dose in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.39; P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a weaker antibody response despite the completion of the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in KT recipients than in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid use in KT recipients might be the main contributor to this observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":33357,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","volume":"37 1","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/3c/kjt-37-1-49.PMC10090824.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.22.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit decreased antibody responses, mainly due to their weakened immune systems. However, data are limited on antibody responses after the primary series of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among recipients of various solid organ transplant types. Thus, we compared the antibody responses after three COVID-19 vaccine doses between liver transplant (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled solid organ transplant recipients who received three COVID-19 vaccine doses from June 2021 to February 2022 and measured S1-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: Seventy-six LT and 17 KT recipients were included in the final analysis. KT recipients showed consistently lower antibody responses even after the third vaccine dose (86.2% vs. 52.9%, P=0.008) and lower antibody titers (median, 423.0 IU/mL [interquartile range, 99.6-2,057 IU/mL] vs. 19.7 IU/mL [interquartile range, 6.9-339.4 IU/mL]; P=0.006) than were observed in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid was a significant risk factor for a seropositive antibody response after the third vaccine dose in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.39; P=0.02).

Conclusions: We found a weaker antibody response despite the completion of the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in KT recipients than in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid use in KT recipients might be the main contributor to this observation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三剂COVID-19 mRNA疫苗诱导的肝和肾移植受者抗体反应不同
背景:实体器官移植受者表现出抗体反应下降,主要是由于他们的免疫系统减弱。然而,在各种实体器官移植类型的受者中,关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗初级系列后抗体反应的数据有限。因此,我们比较了肝移植(LT)和肾移植(KT)受者在三种COVID-19疫苗剂量后的抗体反应。方法:前瞻性纳入2021年6月至2022年2月期间接受三剂COVID-19疫苗的实体器官移植受者,并使用酶联免疫吸附试验测量s1特异性免疫球蛋白G抗体。结果:最终分析纳入了76例LT和17例KT受体。KT受者即使在第三次接种疫苗后仍表现出较低的抗体应答(86.2% vs. 52.9%, P=0.008)和较低的抗体滴度(中位数,423.0 IU/mL[四分位数范围,99.6- 2057 IU/mL] vs. 19.7 IU/mL[四分位数范围,6.9-339.4 IU/mL];P=0.006)。在多变量分析中,霉酚酸是第三次疫苗剂量后血清抗体阳性反应的重要危险因素(优势比,0.06;95%置信区间为0.00-0.39;P = 0.02)。结论:我们发现,尽管完成了第一轮COVID-19疫苗接种,KT受体的抗体反应比LT受体弱。KT受体中霉酚酸的使用可能是这一观察结果的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Transplantation
Korean Journal of Transplantation Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inferior polar nephrectomy and vesicocalicostomy for complete ureteric stricture following antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplant: a report of a rare case. Overcoming the longest cold ischemia time yet seen in Korea using hypothermic machine perfusion in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a case report. Patient management for thoracic organ donor candidates: the lung transplantation team's view. Surgical techniques for robotic right donor hepatectomy, part 2: robotic parenchymal transection and bile duct division. Surgical techniques for robotic right donor hepatectomy, part 1: robotic hilar dissection and right lobe mobilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1