{"title":"Correlations Analysis of Different Pelvic Tilt Definitions: A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Yuan Chai, A Mounir Boudali, William L Walter","doi":"10.1177/15563316221136128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Pelvic tilt (PT) is described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet 4 PT definitions were established based on radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PT<sub>a</sub>), the center of femoral heads to sacral plate (PT<sub>m</sub>), pelvic outlet (PT<sub>h</sub>), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking, and their differences are sometimes ignored. <i>Purpose</i>: This study aimed to examine the correlations and differences of PT definitions for education and research purposes. <i>Methods</i>: This study reviewed 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs of patients (68 men and 37 women) awaiting hip surgery at a single clinic. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for subgroup analysis. Two observers annotated 4 PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after 6 months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% confidence interval. <i>Results</i>: The SS showed no correlation to the other 3 PT definitions, except for females in the hip hardware subgroup (n = 17). PT<sub>m</sub> demonstrated very strong linear correlation to PT<sub>h</sub> (<i>r</i> > 0.9) under the linear model PT<sub>m</sub> = 0.951 × PT<sub>h</sub> - 68.284. <i>Conclusion</i>: The PT<sub>m</sub> and PT<sub>h</sub> can be calculated from each other under a simple linear regression equation, which enables comparisons between them. SS presented poor correlations to the other PT parameters, except for the female subgroup with hip implant that required further analysis; PT<sub>a</sub>-related comparisons showed high anatomical variations between patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73256,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"19 2","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10090844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316221136128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pelvic tilt (PT) is described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet 4 PT definitions were established based on radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PTa), the center of femoral heads to sacral plate (PTm), pelvic outlet (PTh), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking, and their differences are sometimes ignored. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the correlations and differences of PT definitions for education and research purposes. Methods: This study reviewed 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs of patients (68 men and 37 women) awaiting hip surgery at a single clinic. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for subgroup analysis. Two observers annotated 4 PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after 6 months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% confidence interval. Results: The SS showed no correlation to the other 3 PT definitions, except for females in the hip hardware subgroup (n = 17). PTm demonstrated very strong linear correlation to PTh (r > 0.9) under the linear model PTm = 0.951 × PTh - 68.284. Conclusion: The PTm and PTh can be calculated from each other under a simple linear regression equation, which enables comparisons between them. SS presented poor correlations to the other PT parameters, except for the female subgroup with hip implant that required further analysis; PTa-related comparisons showed high anatomical variations between patients.