Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair with quick fenestrater assisted in situ fenestration for type B aortic dissection.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-09 DOI:10.1177/17085381221140168
Tianxiao He, Jun Bai, Jianjin Wu, Yandong Liu, Lefeng Qu
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair with quick fenestrater assisted in situ fenestration for type B aortic dissection.","authors":"Tianxiao He, Jun Bai, Jianjin Wu, Yandong Liu, Lefeng Qu","doi":"10.1177/17085381221140168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the long-term outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and quick fenestrated (QF)-assisted in situ fenestration (ISF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2017 and December 2018, 15 patients with TBAD requiring revascularization of the supra-aortic trunks underwent TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF at our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen of the 15 patients were male, and the mean age was 52.87 ± 11.26. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0. The median follow-up period was 41 months (range, 35-49). During follow-up, one non-aortic-related death was recorded, no fenestration lost its alignment, and no stroke or stent graft migration was observed. Two patients underwent another successful endovascular repair. One case of type Ib endoleak occurred 19 months postoperatively. This was caused by aortic progression distal to the stent graft. Another stent graft with a larger diameter was implanted in the descending aorta. One case of type Ic endoleak was observed 35 months postoperatively. The patient was diagnosed during the annual follow-up without any symptoms. Another bridging stent graft was implanted into the left subclavian artery distal to the already existing one, and the type Ic endoleak was successfully treated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF may be an effective treatment for ISF in type B aortic dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"937-945"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381221140168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To report the long-term outcomes of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and quick fenestrated (QF)-assisted in situ fenestration (ISF).

Methods: Between October 2017 and December 2018, 15 patients with TBAD requiring revascularization of the supra-aortic trunks underwent TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF at our institution.

Results: Thirteen of the 15 patients were male, and the mean age was 52.87 ± 11.26. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 0. The median follow-up period was 41 months (range, 35-49). During follow-up, one non-aortic-related death was recorded, no fenestration lost its alignment, and no stroke or stent graft migration was observed. Two patients underwent another successful endovascular repair. One case of type Ib endoleak occurred 19 months postoperatively. This was caused by aortic progression distal to the stent graft. Another stent graft with a larger diameter was implanted in the descending aorta. One case of type Ic endoleak was observed 35 months postoperatively. The patient was diagnosed during the annual follow-up without any symptoms. Another bridging stent graft was implanted into the left subclavian artery distal to the already existing one, and the type Ic endoleak was successfully treated.

Conclusions: TEVAR with QF-assisted ISF may be an effective treatment for ISF in type B aortic dissection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔内血管修复术与快速栅栏辅助原位栅栏术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层的长期疗效。
目的报告B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者接受胸腔内血管主动脉修补术(TEVAR)和快速瓣膜化(QF)辅助原位瓣膜化(ISF)治疗的长期疗效:2017年10月至2018年12月期间,15名需要对主动脉上干进行血管重建的TBAD患者在我院接受了TEVAR与QF辅助ISF手术:15 名患者中有 13 名男性,平均年龄为(52.87±11.26)岁。技术成功率为 100%,30 天死亡率为 0。中位随访时间为 41 个月(35-49 个月)。在随访期间,记录到一例非主动脉相关死亡,没有栅栏失去对齐,也没有观察到中风或支架移位。两名患者再次成功接受了血管内修复术。一例 Ib 型内漏发生在术后 19 个月。这是支架移植物远端主动脉进展造成的。另一个直径更大的支架移植物被植入降主动脉。术后 35 个月观察到一例 Ic 型内漏。患者是在没有任何症状的情况下进行年度随访时确诊的。在已有支架的远端,将另一个桥接支架移植植入左锁骨下动脉,成功治疗了Ic型内漏:结论:TEVAR加QF辅助ISF可能是治疗B型主动脉夹层ISF的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of prophylactic fasciotomy in patients with non-traumatic acute limb ischemia. Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with eversion technique in patients with an open circle of Willis: A multicenter registry study. Intercostal bypass graft pseudoaneurysm repaired with percutaneous glue embolization utilizing CT needle guidance: A case report. A novel non-pneumatic compression device results in reduced foot and ankle swelling in patients with venous and lymphatic edema. Reliability of a portable toe pressure photoplethysmography device compared to a stationary laser doppler flowmeter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1