Quetiapine and olanzapine misuse prevalence in a US general population sample.

Kirk E Evoy, Shelby Humpert, Sorina Torrez, Haneen Hussein, Jordan R Covvey
{"title":"Quetiapine and olanzapine misuse prevalence in a US general population sample.","authors":"Kirk E Evoy,&nbsp;Shelby Humpert,&nbsp;Sorina Torrez,&nbsp;Haneen Hussein,&nbsp;Jordan R Covvey","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.04.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are associated with misuse potential; however, there are limited data describing the prevalence and characteristics of this misuse. This study was conducted to identify and describe quetiapine and olanzapine misuse among US adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey questionnaire was conducted online using Qualtrics research panel aggregator service to identify a quota-based sample of respondents constructed to mimic the general US population aged 18 to 59 years, with regards to gender, geographic region, ethnicity, income, and education level. Misuse was defined as using quetiapine or olanzapine for treatment outside of medical recommendations, for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition, or obtaining without a prescription. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SGA misuse, incorporating relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1843 total respondents, 229 had a history of quetiapine or olanzapine use. Misuse prevalence was estimated to be 6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%). Although most respondents (∼70%) using quetiapine or olanzapine reported doing so to treat a diagnosed medical condition, those misusing them most commonly did so because prescribed medications failed to relieve their symptoms. Misuse was commonly reported (∼50%) concomitantly with opioids, benzodiazepines, or alcohol. Factors significantly associated with quetiapine or olanzapine misuse included employment (OR = 4.64), previous substance use disorder treatment (OR = 2.48), and having riskier attitudes toward medication misuse (OR = 1.23).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Misuse of quetiapine and olanzapine, while fairly limited in prevalence, appears to be primarily associated with under-treatment of existing medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 2","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/b3/i2168-9709-13-2-25.PMC10094996.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.04.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are associated with misuse potential; however, there are limited data describing the prevalence and characteristics of this misuse. This study was conducted to identify and describe quetiapine and olanzapine misuse among US adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey questionnaire was conducted online using Qualtrics research panel aggregator service to identify a quota-based sample of respondents constructed to mimic the general US population aged 18 to 59 years, with regards to gender, geographic region, ethnicity, income, and education level. Misuse was defined as using quetiapine or olanzapine for treatment outside of medical recommendations, for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition, or obtaining without a prescription. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SGA misuse, incorporating relevant covariates.

Results: Among 1843 total respondents, 229 had a history of quetiapine or olanzapine use. Misuse prevalence was estimated to be 6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%). Although most respondents (∼70%) using quetiapine or olanzapine reported doing so to treat a diagnosed medical condition, those misusing them most commonly did so because prescribed medications failed to relieve their symptoms. Misuse was commonly reported (∼50%) concomitantly with opioids, benzodiazepines, or alcohol. Factors significantly associated with quetiapine or olanzapine misuse included employment (OR = 4.64), previous substance use disorder treatment (OR = 2.48), and having riskier attitudes toward medication misuse (OR = 1.23).

Discussion: Misuse of quetiapine and olanzapine, while fairly limited in prevalence, appears to be primarily associated with under-treatment of existing medical conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国普通人群样本中喹硫平和奥氮平滥用的流行情况。
第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)与滥用的可能性有关;然而,描述这种滥用的流行程度和特征的数据有限。本研究旨在识别和描述美国成年人对喹硫平和奥氮平的滥用。方法:使用Qualtrics研究小组聚合服务在线进行横断面调查问卷,以确定基于配额的受访者样本,以模拟美国18至59岁的一般人口,涉及性别,地理区域,种族,收入和教育水平。误用被定义为在医疗建议之外使用喹硫平或奥氮平进行治疗,原因不是诊断的医疗状况,或未经处方获得。使用逻辑回归来确定与SGA滥用相关的因素,并纳入相关协变量。结果:在1843名受访者中,229人有喹硫平或奥氮平的使用史。误用率估计为6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%)。虽然大多数使用喹硫平或奥氮平的应答者(约70%)报告说这样做是为了治疗诊断出的疾病,但那些滥用喹硫平或奥氮平的人最常见的原因是处方药未能缓解他们的症状。误用常与阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物或酒精同时发生(约50%)。与喹硫平或奥氮平滥用显著相关的因素包括就业(or = 4.64)、既往物质使用障碍治疗(or = 2.48)和对药物滥用有更危险的态度(or = 1.23)。讨论:喹硫平和奥氮平的滥用虽然流行程度相当有限,但似乎主要与现有疾病治疗不足有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports Intranasal ketamine as a treatment for psychiatric complications of long COVID: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1