Is there more than meets the eye in PSMA imaging in prostate cancer with PET/MRI? Looking closer at uptake time, correlation with PSA and Gleason score.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1186/s41824-023-00166-5
Borjana Bogdanovic, Esteban L Solari, Alberto Villagran Asiares, Sandra van Marwick, Sylvia Schachoff, Matthias Eiber, Wolfgang A Weber, Stephan G Nekolla
{"title":"Is there more than meets the eye in PSMA imaging in prostate cancer with PET/MRI? Looking closer at uptake time, correlation with PSA and Gleason score.","authors":"Borjana Bogdanovic,&nbsp;Esteban L Solari,&nbsp;Alberto Villagran Asiares,&nbsp;Sandra van Marwick,&nbsp;Sylvia Schachoff,&nbsp;Matthias Eiber,&nbsp;Wolfgang A Weber,&nbsp;Stephan G Nekolla","doi":"10.1186/s41824-023-00166-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with increasing PSA and suspicion for prostate cancer, but previous negative biopsies, PET/MRI is used to test for tumours and target potential following biopsy. We aimed to determine different PSMA PET timing effects on signal kinetics and test its correlation with the patients' PSA and Gleason scores (GS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients were examined for 900 s using PET/MRI approximately 1-2 h p.i. depending on the tracer used (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 or <sup>18</sup>F-rhPSMA7). The scans were reconstructed in static and dynamic mode (6 equal frames capturing \"late\" PSMA dynamics). TACs were computed for detected lesions as well as linear regression plots against time for static (SUV) and dynamic (SUV, SUL, and percent injected dose per gram) parameters. All computed trends were tested for correlation with PSA and GS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Static and dynamic scans allowed unchanged lesion detection despite the difference in statistics. For all tracers, the lesions in the pelvic lymph nodes and bones had a mostly negative activity concentration trend (78% and 68%, resp.), while a mostly positive, stronger trend was found for the lesions in the prostate and prostatic fossa following RPE (84% and 83%, resp.). In case of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11, a strong negative (R<sub>min</sub> = - 0.62, R<sub>max</sub> = - 0.73) correlation was found between the dynamic parameters and the PSA. <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 dynamic data showed no correlation with PSA, while for <sup>18</sup>F-rhPSMA7 dynamic data, it was consistently low positive (R<sub>min</sub> = 0.29, R<sub>max</sub> = 0.33). All tracers showed only moderate correlation against GS (R<sub>min</sub> = 0.41, R<sub>max</sub> = 0.48). The static parameters showed weak correlation with PSA (R<sub>min</sub> = 0.24, R<sub>max</sub> = 0.36) and no correlation with GS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>\"Late\" dynamic PSMA data provided additional insight into the PSMA kinetics. While a stable moderate correlation was found between the PSMA kinetics in pelvic lesions and GS, a significantly variable correlation with the PSA values was shown depending on the radiotracer used, the highest being consistently for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11. We reason that with such late dynamics, the PSMA kinetics are relatively stable and imaging could even take place at earlier time points as is now in the clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106533/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-023-00166-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In patients with increasing PSA and suspicion for prostate cancer, but previous negative biopsies, PET/MRI is used to test for tumours and target potential following biopsy. We aimed to determine different PSMA PET timing effects on signal kinetics and test its correlation with the patients' PSA and Gleason scores (GS).

Methods: A total of 100 patients were examined for 900 s using PET/MRI approximately 1-2 h p.i. depending on the tracer used (68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-1007 or 18F-rhPSMA7). The scans were reconstructed in static and dynamic mode (6 equal frames capturing "late" PSMA dynamics). TACs were computed for detected lesions as well as linear regression plots against time for static (SUV) and dynamic (SUV, SUL, and percent injected dose per gram) parameters. All computed trends were tested for correlation with PSA and GS.

Results: Static and dynamic scans allowed unchanged lesion detection despite the difference in statistics. For all tracers, the lesions in the pelvic lymph nodes and bones had a mostly negative activity concentration trend (78% and 68%, resp.), while a mostly positive, stronger trend was found for the lesions in the prostate and prostatic fossa following RPE (84% and 83%, resp.). In case of 68Ga-PSMA-11, a strong negative (Rmin = - 0.62, Rmax = - 0.73) correlation was found between the dynamic parameters and the PSA. 18F-PSMA-1007 dynamic data showed no correlation with PSA, while for 18F-rhPSMA7 dynamic data, it was consistently low positive (Rmin = 0.29, Rmax = 0.33). All tracers showed only moderate correlation against GS (Rmin = 0.41, Rmax = 0.48). The static parameters showed weak correlation with PSA (Rmin = 0.24, Rmax = 0.36) and no correlation with GS.

Conclusion: "Late" dynamic PSMA data provided additional insight into the PSMA kinetics. While a stable moderate correlation was found between the PSMA kinetics in pelvic lesions and GS, a significantly variable correlation with the PSA values was shown depending on the radiotracer used, the highest being consistently for 68Ga-PSMA-11. We reason that with such late dynamics, the PSMA kinetics are relatively stable and imaging could even take place at earlier time points as is now in the clinical routine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PET/MRI在前列腺癌的PSMA成像中是否有比眼睛看到的更多的东西?进一步观察摄取时间,与PSA和Gleason评分的相关性。
背景:在PSA升高和怀疑前列腺癌,但既往活检阴性的患者中,PET/MRI用于活检后检测肿瘤和靶电位。我们的目的是确定不同的PSMA PET定时对信号动力学的影响,并测试其与患者的PSA和Gleason评分(GS)的相关性。方法:根据使用的示踪剂(68Ga-PSMA-11、18F-PSMA-1007或18F-rhPSMA7),共对100例患者进行了900 s的PET/MRI检查,每小时约1-2小时。在静态和动态模式下重建扫描(6个相等的帧捕捉“晚期”PSMA动态)。计算检测到的病变的tac以及静态(SUV)和动态(SUV, SUL和每克注射剂量百分比)参数随时间的线性回归图。所有计算的趋势都与PSA和GS的相关性进行了测试。结果:静态扫描和动态扫描允许病变检测不变,尽管统计差异。对于所有示踪剂,盆腔淋巴结和骨骼病变的活性浓度趋势大多为阴性(78%和68%,分别为对照),而前列腺和前列腺窝病变的活性浓度趋势大多为阳性,趋势更强(84%和83%,分别为对照)。对于68Ga-PSMA-11,动态参数与PSA呈强负相关(Rmin = - 0.62, Rmax = - 0.73)。18F-PSMA-1007动态数据与PSA无相关性,而18F-rhPSMA7动态数据始终呈低阳性(Rmin = 0.29, Rmax = 0.33)。所有示踪剂与GS的相关性均为中等(Rmin = 0.41, Rmax = 0.48)。静态参数与PSA呈弱相关(Rmin = 0.24, Rmax = 0.36),与GS无相关性。结论:“晚期”动态PSMA数据为PSMA动力学提供了额外的见解。虽然盆腔病变的PSMA动力学与GS之间存在稳定的中度相关性,但根据所使用的放射性示踪剂,PSA值与PSA值之间存在显著的可变相关性,最高的是68Ga-PSMA-11。我们认为,有了这样的晚期动力学,PSMA动力学相对稳定,成像甚至可以在更早的时间点进行,就像现在的临床常规一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor demonstrated by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a patient: a case report Carcinoid crisis in Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, recognition, and treatment Four-dimensional computed tomography as first-line imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism, a retrospective comparison to conventional imaging in a predominantly single adenoma population Clinical value of semi-quantitative parameters in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in treatment and diagnostics of cranial meningioma in a single-center retrospective analysis Cardiac transplant rejection assessment with 18F-FDG PET-CT: initial single-centre experience for diagnosis and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1