Is Research Reproducibility the New Data Management for Libraries?

Cynthia R.H. Vitale
{"title":"Is Research Reproducibility the New Data Management for Libraries?","authors":"Cynthia R.H. Vitale","doi":"10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>EDITOR'S SUMMARY</p>\n <p>With reproducibility of research becoming a leading issue in academia, libraries are examiningtheir role in promoting data and information transparency. The National Science Foundation's requirement for data management plans in research projects, grant applications stressing evidence of unbiased results and scholars' demands for standards for reproducibility together highlight the need for attention to the issue.Libraries increasingly seek staff with skills to support their data repositories, curation and data management services, and library and information science programs are responding to the growing need for specialization, including courses in research reproducibility. A ready solution may be for librarians to develop best practices for research transparency and methods to document research workflow. As the demand grows for evidence that research can be replicated, libraries are well positioned not only to manage research data properly but also to enable it to be analyzed for reproducibility.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100205,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"42 3","pages":"38-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420313","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

EDITOR'S SUMMARY

With reproducibility of research becoming a leading issue in academia, libraries are examiningtheir role in promoting data and information transparency. The National Science Foundation's requirement for data management plans in research projects, grant applications stressing evidence of unbiased results and scholars' demands for standards for reproducibility together highlight the need for attention to the issue.Libraries increasingly seek staff with skills to support their data repositories, curation and data management services, and library and information science programs are responding to the growing need for specialization, including courses in research reproducibility. A ready solution may be for librarians to develop best practices for research transparency and methods to document research workflow. As the demand grows for evidence that research can be replicated, libraries are well positioned not only to manage research data properly but also to enable it to be analyzed for reproducibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究再现性是图书馆新的数据管理方式吗?
随着研究的可重复性成为学术界的主要问题,图书馆正在审视它们在促进数据和信息透明度方面的作用。美国国家科学基金会(National Science Foundation)对研究项目数据管理计划的要求、强调无偏见结果证据的资助申请以及学者对可重复性标准的要求,都突显了关注这一问题的必要性。图书馆越来越多地寻求有技能的员工来支持他们的数据存储库、策展和数据管理服务,图书馆和信息科学项目正在响应日益增长的专业化需求,包括研究可重复性课程。一个现成的解决方案可能是图书馆员开发研究透明度的最佳实践和记录研究工作流程的方法。随着对研究可复制证据的需求不断增长,图书馆不仅能够妥善管理研究数据,而且能够对其进行再现性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Four Claims on Research Assessment and Metric Use in the Humanities Using Zombies to Teach Collaborative Scholarship and Born-Digital Publishing 2016 ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Diversity and Inclusion Luncheon: Report and Recommendations Open Access Publishing Models and How OA Can Work in the Humanities Collaboration in the Spotlight: The Open Symphony Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1