Perceptions of diabetes management among adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: development and validation of the Japanese version of the diabetes family responsibility questionnaire.
{"title":"Perceptions of diabetes management among adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: development and validation of the Japanese version of the diabetes family responsibility questionnaire.","authors":"Hiro Matsumoto, Kaori Nio, Tomoyuki Kawamura, Yoko Obayashi, Yuko Hotta, Yoshihiko Yuyama, Naoko Nishikawa","doi":"10.1007/s13340-022-00609-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shift in diabetes management responsibility is critical for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Currently, in Japan, there is insufficient progress in the development of scales for evaluating diabetes management responsibility. We developed the Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ), a scale to evaluate diabetes management responsibility, and verified its reliability and validity. We recruited 12-18-year-old adolescents with T1D and their caregivers. The DFRQ questionnaires (DFRQ-A for adolescents and DFRQ-C for caregivers) were distributed. The responses of 31 pairs were analyzed (adolescents: 9 males, 22 females; mean age: 14.8 ± 1.5 years). The median total DFRQ scores of adolescents (30.0) and caregivers (32.0) were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.269). The internal consistencies (Cronbach's α) were 0.784 and 0.687 for DFRQ-A and DFRQ-C, respectively. DFRQ-A scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak statistically significant negative correlation (<i>r</i> = - 0.397, <i>p</i> = 0.027), whereas DFRQ-C scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak negative correlation not statistically significant (<i>r</i> = - 0.311, <i>p</i> = 0.089). Both scores were significantly negatively correlated with self-efficacy for diabetes self-management scores (<i>r</i> = - 0.390, <i>p</i> = 0.030; <i>r</i> = - 0.478, p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significantly moderate positive correlation was found between these scores (<i>r</i> = 0.624, <i>p</i> < 0.001). We confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of DFRQ. DFRQ is expected to be used as a dyadic scale to evaluate the status of diabetes management responsibility and its transition during adolescence in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"14 2","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734505/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00609-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The shift in diabetes management responsibility is critical for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Currently, in Japan, there is insufficient progress in the development of scales for evaluating diabetes management responsibility. We developed the Japanese version of the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ), a scale to evaluate diabetes management responsibility, and verified its reliability and validity. We recruited 12-18-year-old adolescents with T1D and their caregivers. The DFRQ questionnaires (DFRQ-A for adolescents and DFRQ-C for caregivers) were distributed. The responses of 31 pairs were analyzed (adolescents: 9 males, 22 females; mean age: 14.8 ± 1.5 years). The median total DFRQ scores of adolescents (30.0) and caregivers (32.0) were not significantly different (p = 0.269). The internal consistencies (Cronbach's α) were 0.784 and 0.687 for DFRQ-A and DFRQ-C, respectively. DFRQ-A scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak statistically significant negative correlation (r = - 0.397, p = 0.027), whereas DFRQ-C scores and adolescent age demonstrated a weak negative correlation not statistically significant (r = - 0.311, p = 0.089). Both scores were significantly negatively correlated with self-efficacy for diabetes self-management scores (r = - 0.390, p = 0.030; r = - 0.478, p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significantly moderate positive correlation was found between these scores (r = 0.624, p < 0.001). We confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of DFRQ. DFRQ is expected to be used as a dyadic scale to evaluate the status of diabetes management responsibility and its transition during adolescence in Japan.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.