Evaluation of patients of vaccine side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20221035
Muhammed Semih Gedik, Ali İhsan Kilci, Hakan Hakkoymaz, Ömer Faruk Küçük, Yavuzalp Solak, Nuri Mehmet Basan, Yunus Emre Çıkrıkçı
{"title":"Evaluation of patients of vaccine side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine.","authors":"Muhammed Semih Gedik,&nbsp;Ali İhsan Kilci,&nbsp;Hakan Hakkoymaz,&nbsp;Ömer Faruk Küçük,&nbsp;Yavuzalp Solak,&nbsp;Nuri Mehmet Basan,&nbsp;Yunus Emre Çıkrıkçı","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20221035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postvaccine side effects were evaluated in patients presenting to our emergency department with complaints of vaccine side effects after taking COVID-19 vaccine, and new unknown side effects ranging from mild complaints to life-threatening risks, and frequency of all side effects were investigated. This study aimed to establish a scientific resource to identify the potential side effects of the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' demographic information, clinical characteristics, epicrisis reports, COVID-19 disease and vaccination histories, vital values, and blood values were examined. The SPSS 20.0 package program was used for statistical evaluation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Notably, 13.1% of patients presenting to the emergency department started to have complaints after taking Sinovac vaccine, whereas 86.9% of them had complaints after taking BioNTech vaccine. Also, 36.9% of patients stated that they had COVID-19. All patients had a Glasgow coma scale score of 15 during admission. No patient was hospitalized, ventilator was not needed, and all patients were discharged. While the most common presenting complaint to the emergency department after vaccination was fatigue in 29.7%, the most common diagnoses after examination in the emergency department were myalgia in 32.1% and upper respiratory tract infection in 28.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results and conclusions of our study will guide healthcare workers and patients on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/b6/1806-9282-ramb-69-01-0147.PMC9937590.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Postvaccine side effects were evaluated in patients presenting to our emergency department with complaints of vaccine side effects after taking COVID-19 vaccine, and new unknown side effects ranging from mild complaints to life-threatening risks, and frequency of all side effects were investigated. This study aimed to establish a scientific resource to identify the potential side effects of the vaccine.

Methods: Patients' demographic information, clinical characteristics, epicrisis reports, COVID-19 disease and vaccination histories, vital values, and blood values were examined. The SPSS 20.0 package program was used for statistical evaluation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Notably, 13.1% of patients presenting to the emergency department started to have complaints after taking Sinovac vaccine, whereas 86.9% of them had complaints after taking BioNTech vaccine. Also, 36.9% of patients stated that they had COVID-19. All patients had a Glasgow coma scale score of 15 during admission. No patient was hospitalized, ventilator was not needed, and all patients were discharged. While the most common presenting complaint to the emergency department after vaccination was fatigue in 29.7%, the most common diagnoses after examination in the emergency department were myalgia in 32.1% and upper respiratory tract infection in 28.6%.

Conclusion: Results and conclusions of our study will guide healthcare workers and patients on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗接种后疫苗副作用患者评价。
目的:评估以新冠肺炎疫苗副反应为主诉就诊于急诊科的患者接种后疫苗副反应情况,以及新出现的未知副反应,从轻微主诉到危及生命的危险,并调查所有副反应发生的频率。本研究旨在建立科学资源,以确定疫苗的潜在副作用。方法:对患者的人口学资料、临床特征、疫情报告、COVID-19疾病及疫苗接种史、生命体征、血值进行统计。采用SPSS 20.0软件包程序进行统计评价。结果:值得注意的是,到急诊科就诊的患者中,有13.1%的人在接种了科兴疫苗后开始有投诉,而86.9%的人在接种了BioNTech疫苗后开始有投诉。36.9%的患者表示自己感染了新冠病毒。所有患者入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分为15分。无患者住院,无需呼吸机,全部出院。接种疫苗后到急诊科最常见的主诉是疲劳(29.7%),急诊科检查后最常见的诊断是肌痛(32.1%)和上呼吸道感染(28.6%)。结论:我们的研究结果和结论将指导医护人员和患者了解COVID-19疫苗的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical features of sella turcica with comprehensive literature review. ERRATUM. A needful, unique, and in-place evaluation of the injuries in earthquake victims with computed tomography, in catastrophic disasters! The 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes: part II. The challenge of tobacco and nicotine use among women. 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1