Readmissions after radical nephrectomy in a national cohort.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/21681805.2023.2166579
Joaquin Michel, Dhaval Jivanji, Alexander N Goel, Patrick M Lec, Andrew T Lenis, Mark S Litwin, Karim Chamie
{"title":"Readmissions after radical nephrectomy in a national cohort.","authors":"Joaquin Michel,&nbsp;Dhaval Jivanji,&nbsp;Alexander N Goel,&nbsp;Patrick M Lec,&nbsp;Andrew T Lenis,&nbsp;Mark S Litwin,&nbsp;Karim Chamie","doi":"10.1080/21681805.2023.2166579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the factors and costs associated with 30-day readmissions for patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to identify adults who underwent radical nephrectomy for renal cancer, stratified by surgical approach. We determined patient factors associated with readmission rates, diagnoses, and costs using multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,523 individuals, the 30-day readmission rate was 7.7% (<i>n</i> = 1,506). On multivariate regression, odds of readmission were significantly increased with age ≥75 in those who underwent open nephrectomy (OR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.03-1.78). Subjects with a Charlson comorbidity score ≥3 had significantly higher rates of readmission regardless of surgical approach (Open RN - OR: 1.85; 95%CI: 1.33-2.56; Lap RN - OR: 1.99; 95%CI 1.10-3.59; Robotic RN - OR: 2.18; 95%CI: 1.23-3.86). Common reasons for readmission were gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urinary tract infections, and wound complications across all surgical approaches. The mean cost per readmission was as high as 126% ($20,357) of the mean index admission cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in 13 adults undergoing radical nephrectomy is readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Associated readmission cost is up to 1.26 times the cost of index admission. Our findings may inform efforts aiming to reduce hospital readmissions and curtail healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2023.2166579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the factors and costs associated with 30-day readmissions for patients undergoing radical nephrectomy.

Materials and methods: We used the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to identify adults who underwent radical nephrectomy for renal cancer, stratified by surgical approach. We determined patient factors associated with readmission rates, diagnoses, and costs using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Among 19,523 individuals, the 30-day readmission rate was 7.7% (n = 1,506). On multivariate regression, odds of readmission were significantly increased with age ≥75 in those who underwent open nephrectomy (OR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.03-1.78). Subjects with a Charlson comorbidity score ≥3 had significantly higher rates of readmission regardless of surgical approach (Open RN - OR: 1.85; 95%CI: 1.33-2.56; Lap RN - OR: 1.99; 95%CI 1.10-3.59; Robotic RN - OR: 2.18; 95%CI: 1.23-3.86). Common reasons for readmission were gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urinary tract infections, and wound complications across all surgical approaches. The mean cost per readmission was as high as 126% ($20,357) of the mean index admission cost.

Conclusion: One in 13 adults undergoing radical nephrectomy is readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Associated readmission cost is up to 1.26 times the cost of index admission. Our findings may inform efforts aiming to reduce hospital readmissions and curtail healthcare costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根治性肾切除术后的再入院情况。
目的:分析根治性肾切除术患者30天再入院的相关因素和费用。材料和方法:我们使用2014年全国再入院数据库来识别因肾癌接受根治性肾切除术的成年人,并按手术入路分层。我们使用多变量逻辑回归确定与再入院率、诊断和费用相关的患者因素。结果:在19523例患者中,30天再入院率为7.7% (n = 1,506)。多因素回归分析显示,年龄≥75岁行开放式肾切除术的患者再入院的几率显著增加(OR: 1.35;95%置信区间:1.03—-1.78)。Charlson合并症评分≥3的受试者再入院率显著高于其他手术方式(Open RN - OR: 1.85;95%置信区间:1.33—-2.56;单圈RN - OR: 1.99;95%可信区间1.10 - -3.59;机器人RN - OR: 2.18;95%置信区间:1.23—-3.86)。再入院的常见原因是胃肠道、心血管、尿路感染和所有手术入路的伤口并发症。每次再入院的平均成本高达平均指数入院成本的126%(20,357美元)。结论:13例接受根治性肾切除术的成人中有1例在出院后30天内再次入院。相关的再入院费用高达指数入院费用的1.26倍。我们的研究结果可以为减少再入院率和降低医疗费用的努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
期刊最新文献
Urinary stone assessment in a single-phase may replace the unenhanced and multiphase computed tomography protocol in painless visible haematuria. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of renal tumour biopsy in patients with small renal masses and its impact on treatment decisions. A population-based registry cohort study on the correlation between bladder-intact event-free survival and overall survival in cystectomy-ineligible/refusal muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients in Sweden. Minimising warm ischaemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A video-based assessment of tumour excision, kidney reconstruction and intermediate time. Violation of onco-surgical principles is associated with survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinomas after radical nephroureterectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1