PIVKA-II or AFP has better diagnostic properties for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis in high-risk patients.

Tanita Suttichaimongkol, Manoon Mitpracha, Kawin Tangvoraphonkchai, Phuangphaka Sadee, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen
{"title":"PIVKA-II or AFP has better diagnostic properties for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis in high-risk patients.","authors":"Tanita Suttichaimongkol,&nbsp;Manoon Mitpracha,&nbsp;Kawin Tangvoraphonkchai,&nbsp;Phuangphaka Sadee,&nbsp;Kittisak Sawanyawisuth,&nbsp;Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen","doi":"10.33393/jcb.2023.2453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal cancer. Two biomarkers were used for HCC diagnosis including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II or antagonist (PIVKA-II). However, data on biomarkers and HCC diagnosis are not consistent. This study aimed to evaluate if PIVKA-II, AFP, or a combination of both biomarkers had the best diagnostic properties for HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study and enrolled patients 18 years or over with a high risk for HCC. AFP and PIVKA-II levels were calculated for HCC diagnosis. Diagnostic properties of both biomarkers were reported with sensitivity, specificity, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 260 patients with high risk for HCC in this cohort. Of those, 219 patients were diagnosed with HCC: confirmed by biopsy in 7 patients (2.69%) and by imaging in the others. Median values of AFP and PIVKA-II were 56 ng/mL and 348 mAU/mL, respectively. PIVKA-II level of 40 mAU/mL had sensitivity of 80.80%, while AFP of 10 ng/mL had sensitivity of 75.80%. A combination of PIVKA-II at 100 mAU/mL or over and AFP of 11 ng/mL gave sensitivity of 60.30%. The ROC curve of PIVKA-II plus AFP was significantly higher than the AFP alone (0.855 vs. 0.796; p = 0.027), but not significantly different from the PIVKA-II alone (0.855 vs. 0.832; p = 0.130).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIVKA-II may have more diagnostic yield for HCC compared with AFP. It can be used alone without a combination with AFP.</p>","PeriodicalId":37524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/29/jcb-12-12.PMC9952284.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Circulating Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/jcb.2023.2453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal cancer. Two biomarkers were used for HCC diagnosis including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II or antagonist (PIVKA-II). However, data on biomarkers and HCC diagnosis are not consistent. This study aimed to evaluate if PIVKA-II, AFP, or a combination of both biomarkers had the best diagnostic properties for HCC.

Methods: This was a prospective study and enrolled patients 18 years or over with a high risk for HCC. AFP and PIVKA-II levels were calculated for HCC diagnosis. Diagnostic properties of both biomarkers were reported with sensitivity, specificity, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: There were 260 patients with high risk for HCC in this cohort. Of those, 219 patients were diagnosed with HCC: confirmed by biopsy in 7 patients (2.69%) and by imaging in the others. Median values of AFP and PIVKA-II were 56 ng/mL and 348 mAU/mL, respectively. PIVKA-II level of 40 mAU/mL had sensitivity of 80.80%, while AFP of 10 ng/mL had sensitivity of 75.80%. A combination of PIVKA-II at 100 mAU/mL or over and AFP of 11 ng/mL gave sensitivity of 60.30%. The ROC curve of PIVKA-II plus AFP was significantly higher than the AFP alone (0.855 vs. 0.796; p = 0.027), but not significantly different from the PIVKA-II alone (0.855 vs. 0.832; p = 0.130).

Conclusion: PIVKA-II may have more diagnostic yield for HCC compared with AFP. It can be used alone without a combination with AFP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PIVKA-II或AFP对高危患者的肝癌诊断有较好的诊断价值。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种致命的癌症。两种生物标志物用于HCC诊断,包括甲胎蛋白(AFP)和维生素K缺失- ii或拮抗剂(PIVKA-II)诱导的蛋白。然而,关于生物标志物和HCC诊断的数据并不一致。本研究旨在评估PIVKA-II、AFP或两种生物标志物的组合是否具有HCC的最佳诊断特性。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了18岁或以上的HCC高危患者。计算AFP和PIVKA-II水平用于HCC诊断。报告了两种生物标志物的诊断特性,包括敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果:该队列中有260例HCC高危患者。其中,219例患者被诊断为HCC: 7例(2.69%)患者通过活检确诊,其余患者通过影像学确诊。AFP和PIVKA-II的中位值分别为56 ng/mL和348 mAU/mL。40 mAU/mL的PIVKA-II水平敏感性为80.80%,10 ng/mL的AFP敏感性为75.80%。100 mAU/mL以上的PIVKA-II和11 ng/mL的AFP联合使用,灵敏度为60.30%。PIVKA-II联合AFP的ROC曲线显著高于单独AFP (0.855 vs 0.796;p = 0.027),但与单独PIVKA-II无显著差异(0.855比0.832;P = 0.130)。结论:与AFP相比,PIVKA-II可能具有更高的HCC诊断率。它可以单独使用,而不与AFP联合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers
Journal of Circulating Biomarkers Medicine-Biochemistry (medical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Circulating Biomarkers is an international, peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal focusing on all aspects of the rapidly growing field of circulating blood-based biomarkers and diagnostics using circulating protein and lipid markers, circulating tumor cells (CTC), circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes and apoptotic bodies. The journal publishes high-impact articles that deal with all fields related to circulating biomarkers and diagnostics, ranging from basic science to translational and clinical applications. Papers from a wide variety of disciplines are welcome; interdisciplinary studies are especially suitable for this journal. Included within the scope are a broad array of specialties including (but not limited to) cancer, immunology, neurology, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular medicine, regenerative medicine, nosology, physiology, pathology, technological applications in diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccine, drug delivery, regenerative medicine, drug development and clinical trials. The journal also hosts reviews, perspectives and news on specific topics.
期刊最新文献
Relation between interleukin-13 and annexin-V levels and carotid intima-media thickness in nephrotic syndrome. Detection of PSMA expression on circulating tumor cells by blood-based liquid biopsy in prostate cancer. Impact of clinico-biochemical and inflammatory biomarkers on the immunogenicity and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 adenoviral vaccine: a longitudinal study. Impact of clinico-biochemical variations on the etiopathogenesis of cataract: a case-control study. Laboratory biomarkers of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1