Telemedicine medical abortion service in Georgia: an evaluation of a strategy with reduced number of in-Clinic visits.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710
Nino Tsereteli, Lia Mamatsashvili, George Tsertsvadze, Tamar Tsereteli, Ingrida Platais
{"title":"Telemedicine medical abortion service in Georgia: an evaluation of a strategy with reduced number of in-Clinic visits.","authors":"Nino Tsereteli,&nbsp;Lia Mamatsashvili,&nbsp;George Tsertsvadze,&nbsp;Tamar Tsereteli,&nbsp;Ingrida Platais","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, <i>n</i> = 112), took mifepristone (100%, <i>n</i> = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, <i>n</i> = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, <i>n</i> = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, <i>n</i> = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, <i>n</i> = 114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":"28 2","pages":"141-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT).

Methods: Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive.

Results: One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, n = 112), took mifepristone (100%, n = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, n = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, n = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, n = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, n = 114).

Conclusions: The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格鲁吉亚的远程医疗人工流产服务:对减少门诊次数战略的评价。
目的:评估一项医疗流产服务的可行性和可接受性,该服务提供:在强制等待期间进行远程医疗就诊(代替亲自就诊),以及使用多级妊娠试验(MLPT)在家中进行随访。方法:在临床筛选参与者的资格,并在等待期间,收到一个电话,以确认希望继续进行服务。参与者邮寄了一个研究包,其中包含米非司酮、米索前列醇、两种多级妊娠试验,以及它们的使用说明。通过电话进行随访咨询以评估流产的完全性。分析是描述性的。结果:共纳入122人,其中120人在等待期后选择继续流产,并发给研究包。1名参与者失去随访机会。大多数参与者在接受研究包时没有遇到问题(94.1%,n = 112),按照指示服用了米非司酮(100%,n = 119)、米索前列醇(99.2%,n = 118)和MLPTs (99.1%, n = 116),并放弃了额外的诊所就诊(91.6%,n = 109)。所有参与者都对服务感到满意。大多数参与者在没有手术的情况下完全流产(95.8%,n = 114)。结论:适应远程医疗的人工流产服务是可行的,参与者满意,并有可能使人工流产更加以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
Association of intrauterine device use and risk of abnormal cervical cytology. Evaluation of the effects of menstrual headaches on health-related quality of life in young women: a cross-sectional study. Response to "The evolution of abortion laws: socio-legal insights from the Pre-Roe era and their impact on reproductive health". Sexual behaviour, contraceptive use, and family planning intentions: 30 years of repeated cross-sectional surveys. Sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics of pregnant women with unplanned pregnancy residing in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1