Preference for Male Risk Takers Varies with Relationship Context and Health Status but not COVID Risk.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Evolutionary Psychological Science Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3
Cyril C Grueter, Hannah Goodman, Nicolas Fay, Bradley Walker, David Coall
{"title":"Preference for Male Risk Takers Varies with Relationship Context and Health Status but not COVID Risk.","authors":"Cyril C Grueter, Hannah Goodman, Nicolas Fay, Bradley Walker, David Coall","doi":"10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk taking is more commonly shown by males than females and has a signalling function, serving to advertise one's intrinsic quality to prospective mates. Previous research has established that male risk takers are judged as more attractive for short-term flings than long-term relationships, but the environmental and socioeconomic context surrounding female preferences for male risk takers has been overlooked. Using a survey instrument, we examined female preferences for male risk takers across 1304 females from 47 countries. We found preferences for physical risk takers to be more pronounced in females with a bisexual orientation and females who scored high on risk proneness. Self-reported health was positively associated with preferences for high risk takers as short-term mates, but the effect was moderated by country-level health, i.e. the association was stronger in countries with poorer health. The security provided by better health and access to health care may allow females to capitalise on the genetic quality afforded by selecting a risk-prone male whilst concurrently buffering the potential costs associated with the risk taker's lower paternal investment. The risk of contracting COVID-19 did not predict avoidance of risk takers, perhaps because this environmental cue is too novel to have moulded our behavioural preferences.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":52399,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Psychological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk taking is more commonly shown by males than females and has a signalling function, serving to advertise one's intrinsic quality to prospective mates. Previous research has established that male risk takers are judged as more attractive for short-term flings than long-term relationships, but the environmental and socioeconomic context surrounding female preferences for male risk takers has been overlooked. Using a survey instrument, we examined female preferences for male risk takers across 1304 females from 47 countries. We found preferences for physical risk takers to be more pronounced in females with a bisexual orientation and females who scored high on risk proneness. Self-reported health was positively associated with preferences for high risk takers as short-term mates, but the effect was moderated by country-level health, i.e. the association was stronger in countries with poorer health. The security provided by better health and access to health care may allow females to capitalise on the genetic quality afforded by selecting a risk-prone male whilst concurrently buffering the potential costs associated with the risk taker's lower paternal investment. The risk of contracting COVID-19 did not predict avoidance of risk takers, perhaps because this environmental cue is too novel to have moulded our behavioural preferences.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对男性风险承担者的偏好随关系背景和健康状况而变化,但与 COVID 风险无关。
与女性相比,男性更常表现出冒险精神,这种精神具有信号功能,可以向潜在配偶宣传自己的内在品质。以往的研究已经证实,男性冒险者在短期性爱中比长期关系中更有吸引力,但女性对男性冒险者偏好的环境和社会经济背景却被忽视了。我们使用一种调查工具,研究了来自 47 个国家的 1304 名女性对男性冒险者的偏好。我们发现,双性恋倾向的女性和风险倾向得分较高的女性对身体风险承担者的偏好更为明显。自我报告的健康状况与短期配偶对高风险者的偏好呈正相关,但这种影响受国家健康状况的调节,即在健康状况较差的国家,这种相关性更强。较好的健康状况和获得医疗保健的机会所提供的保障,可能使雌性在选择高风险雄性时能够充分利用其遗传质量,同时缓冲与风险承担者较低的父亲投资相关的潜在成本。感染COVID-19的风险并不能预测对风险承担者的回避,这可能是因为这种环境线索过于新颖,无法塑造我们的行为偏好:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s40806-023-00354-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Psychological Science
Evolutionary Psychological Science Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Psychological Science is an international, interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research, theoretical contributions, literature reviews, and commentaries addressing human evolved psychology and behavior. The Journal especially welcomes submissions on non-humans that inform human psychology and behavior, as well as submissions that address clinical implications and applications of an evolutionary perspective. The Journal is informed by all the social and life sciences, including anthropology, biology, criminology, law, medicine, philosophy, political science, and the humanities, and welcomes contributions from these and related fields that contribute to the understanding of human evolved psychology and behavior. Submissions should not exceed 10,000 words, all inclusive.
期刊最新文献
Advancing the Understanding of Phenotypic Mimicry in Men’s Conspicuous Consumption Effects of Accelerated Reproductive Timing in Response to Childhood Adversity on Lifetime Reproductive Success in Modern Environments Women’s Dangerous World Beliefs Predict Biases Against Formidable Men in Legal Domains Distractibility and Impulsivity in ADHD as an Evolutionary Mismatch of High Trait Curiosity Reciprocator-Recipient Asymmetries in Reciprocal Altruism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1