The microbiology of arabica and robusta coffee cherries: a comparative study of indigenous bacteria with presumptive impact on coffee quality.

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Fems Microbiology Letters Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI:10.1093/femsle/fnad024
Tunjung Mahatmanto, Wenny B Sunarharum, Fanny A Putri, Caroline A Susanto, Aga O Davian, Untung Murdiyatmo
{"title":"The microbiology of arabica and robusta coffee cherries: a comparative study of indigenous bacteria with presumptive impact on coffee quality.","authors":"Tunjung Mahatmanto,&nbsp;Wenny B Sunarharum,&nbsp;Fanny A Putri,&nbsp;Caroline A Susanto,&nbsp;Aga O Davian,&nbsp;Untung Murdiyatmo","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnad024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arabica and robusta are the two major coffee beans being sold worldwide. It is well recognized that coffee quality is influenced by their origin and the microbiological activities that drive their fermentation. However, in many coffee plantations, information about the natural diversity of bacteria that inhabit the arabica and robusta coffee cherries is limited. Here, we sampled arabica and robusta coffee cherries from Malang, East Java, Indonesia, then sequenced and analysed their bacterial composition. We found that: (a) arabica cherries contained bacteria with less diversity and abundance compared with robusta; (b) both coffee cherries were heavily populated by extremophiles, presumably dispersed from volcanic activities; (c) groups known to be involved in coffee fermentation such as lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, Enterobacteria, and soil-associated bacteria were present in both arabica and robusta coffee cherries, and (d) arabica cherries were dominated by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides. These findings highlight that coffee cherry bacteria are highly diverse, the majority of which might come from the environment, with some potentially beneficial or detrimental to coffee quality. Knowledge of the natural microbial diversity of coffee cherries may be useful for the development of coffee fermentation technologies to yield coffee beans with consistent quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnad024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arabica and robusta are the two major coffee beans being sold worldwide. It is well recognized that coffee quality is influenced by their origin and the microbiological activities that drive their fermentation. However, in many coffee plantations, information about the natural diversity of bacteria that inhabit the arabica and robusta coffee cherries is limited. Here, we sampled arabica and robusta coffee cherries from Malang, East Java, Indonesia, then sequenced and analysed their bacterial composition. We found that: (a) arabica cherries contained bacteria with less diversity and abundance compared with robusta; (b) both coffee cherries were heavily populated by extremophiles, presumably dispersed from volcanic activities; (c) groups known to be involved in coffee fermentation such as lactic acid bacteria, acetic acid bacteria, Enterobacteria, and soil-associated bacteria were present in both arabica and robusta coffee cherries, and (d) arabica cherries were dominated by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides. These findings highlight that coffee cherry bacteria are highly diverse, the majority of which might come from the environment, with some potentially beneficial or detrimental to coffee quality. Knowledge of the natural microbial diversity of coffee cherries may be useful for the development of coffee fermentation technologies to yield coffee beans with consistent quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃的微生物学:对咖啡品质影响的本地细菌的比较研究。
阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔是世界上销售的两种主要咖啡豆。众所周知,咖啡的品质受其原产地和驱动其发酵的微生物活动的影响。然而,在许多咖啡种植园中,关于栖息在阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃中的细菌自然多样性的信息是有限的。在这里,我们取样了来自印度尼西亚东爪哇玛琅的阿拉比卡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃,然后对它们的细菌组成进行了测序和分析。我们发现:(a)阿拉比卡樱桃中细菌的多样性和丰度低于罗布斯塔;(b)两种咖啡樱桃都有大量的极端微生物,可能是火山活动分散的;(c)已知参与咖啡发酵的菌群,如乳酸菌、乙酸菌、肠杆菌和与土壤相关的细菌,在阿拉比卡咖啡和罗布斯塔咖啡樱桃中都存在;(d)阿拉比卡咖啡樱桃以假肠杆菌为主。这些发现强调了咖啡樱桃细菌的高度多样性,其中大多数可能来自环境,其中一些可能对咖啡质量有益或有害。了解咖啡樱桃的天然微生物多样性可能有助于咖啡发酵技术的发展,从而生产出品质一致的咖啡豆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fems Microbiology Letters
Fems Microbiology Letters 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered. 2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020) Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology) The journal is divided into eight Sections: Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies) Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens) Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses) Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies) Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea) Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature) Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology) If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.
期刊最新文献
Genomic insights into symbiosis and host adaptation of sponge-associated novel bacterium, Rossellomorea orangium sp. nov. Salinirarus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., Haloplanus salilacus sp. nov., Haloplanus pelagicus sp. nov., Haloplanus halophilus sp. nov., Haloplanus halobius sp. nov., halophilic archaea isolated from commercial coarse salts with potential as starter cultures for salt-fermented foods. Isolation and characterization of a multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infecting phage and its therapeutic use in mice Organization, Conservation, and Diversity of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Bacillus sp. BH32 and Its Closest Relatives in the Bacillus cereus Group Dynamic responses of Salmonella Typhimurium to re-exposure to sublethal ciprofloxacin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1