Stephanie A Robinson, Mark Zocchi, Carolyn Purington, Linda Am, Kathryn DeLaughter, Varsha G Vimalananda, Dane Netherton, Arlene S Ash, Timothy P Hogan, Stephanie L Shimada
{"title":"Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis.","authors":"Stephanie A Robinson, Mark Zocchi, Carolyn Purington, Linda Am, Kathryn DeLaughter, Varsha G Vimalananda, Dane Netherton, Arlene S Ash, Timothy P Hogan, Stephanie L Shimada","doi":"10.2196/40272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secure messaging use is associated with improved diabetes-related outcomes. However, it is less clear how secure messaging supports diabetes management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined secure message topics between patients and clinical team members in a national sample of veterans with type 2 diabetes to understand use of secure messaging for diabetes management and potential associations with glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed and analyzed the content of secure messages between 448 US Veterans Health Administration patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical teams. We also explored the relationship between secure messaging content and glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Explicit diabetes-related content was the most frequent topic (72.1% of participants), followed by blood pressure (31.7% of participants). Among diabetes-related conversations, 90.7% of patients discussed medication renewals or refills. More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 or more threads about blood pressure compared to those with poor control (37.5% vs 27.2%, P=.02). More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 more threads intended to share information with their clinical team about an aspect of their diabetes management compared to those with poor control (23.7% vs 12.4%, P=.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were few differences in secure messaging topics between patients in good versus poor glycemic control. Those in good control were more likely to engage in informational messages to their team and send messages related to blood pressure. It may be that the specific topic content of the secure messages may not be that important for glycemic control. Simply making it easier for patients to communicate with their clinical teams may be the driving influence between associations previously reported in the literature between secure messaging and positive clinical outcomes in diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"8 ","pages":"e40272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131591/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/40272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Secure messaging use is associated with improved diabetes-related outcomes. However, it is less clear how secure messaging supports diabetes management.
Objective: We examined secure message topics between patients and clinical team members in a national sample of veterans with type 2 diabetes to understand use of secure messaging for diabetes management and potential associations with glycemic control.
Methods: We surveyed and analyzed the content of secure messages between 448 US Veterans Health Administration patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical teams. We also explored the relationship between secure messaging content and glycemic control.
Results: Explicit diabetes-related content was the most frequent topic (72.1% of participants), followed by blood pressure (31.7% of participants). Among diabetes-related conversations, 90.7% of patients discussed medication renewals or refills. More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 or more threads about blood pressure compared to those with poor control (37.5% vs 27.2%, P=.02). More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 more threads intended to share information with their clinical team about an aspect of their diabetes management compared to those with poor control (23.7% vs 12.4%, P=.009).
Conclusions: There were few differences in secure messaging topics between patients in good versus poor glycemic control. Those in good control were more likely to engage in informational messages to their team and send messages related to blood pressure. It may be that the specific topic content of the secure messages may not be that important for glycemic control. Simply making it easier for patients to communicate with their clinical teams may be the driving influence between associations previously reported in the literature between secure messaging and positive clinical outcomes in diabetes.
背景:安全信息的使用与糖尿病相关预后的改善有关。然而,目前尚不清楚安全信息如何支持糖尿病管理。目的:我们在全国2型糖尿病退伍军人样本中研究了患者和临床团队成员之间的安全信息主题,以了解安全信息在糖尿病管理中的使用及其与血糖控制的潜在关联。方法:对448名美国退伍军人健康管理局2型糖尿病患者及其临床团队的安全信息内容进行调查和分析。我们还探讨了安全信息内容与血糖控制之间的关系。结果:明确糖尿病相关内容是最常见的话题(72.1%的参与者),其次是血压(31.7%的参与者)。在与糖尿病相关的谈话中,90.7%的患者讨论了药物更新或重新服用。与血糖控制较差的患者相比,血糖控制良好的患者参与1个或更多关于血压的帖子(37.5% vs 27.2%, P= 0.02)。与血糖控制不佳的患者相比,血糖控制良好的患者更多地参与了旨在与临床团队分享糖尿病管理方面信息的帖子(23.7% vs 12.4%, P= 0.009)。结论:血糖控制良好和血糖控制不佳的患者在安全信息主题上差异不大。那些控制良好的人更有可能向他们的团队传递信息,并发送与血压有关的信息。可能是安全信息的特定主题内容对血糖控制没有那么重要。仅仅使患者更容易与他们的临床团队沟通可能是先前文献中报道的安全信息传递与糖尿病积极临床结果之间关联的驱动影响。