Evaluation of Glove Performance after Decontamination.

Q4 Medicine Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.31
Joseph Nelson Dawson, Suvajyoti Guha, Matthew Schwerin, Anne Lucas
{"title":"Evaluation of Glove Performance after Decontamination.","authors":"Joseph Nelson Dawson, Suvajyoti Guha, Matthew Schwerin, Anne Lucas","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Studies of healthcare providers doffing personal protective equipment, especially gloves, indicate that self-contamination does occur. Although generally this is not hazardous, working with particularly pathogenic organisms, such as Ebola virus and</i> Clostridium difficile, <i>can present a serious health risk. Decontaminating medical gloves before removal can reduce self-contamination and mitigate the spread of these types of pathogens. Also, in cases of extreme shortage, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has specific recommendations for decontaminating gloves for extended use. Reuse of medical gloves is strongly discouraged by both the CDC and Food and Drug Administration. This work seeks to lay a foundation of testing to evaluate whether a decontamination method is compatible for a given glove type and material. Four potential methods of decontamination (commercial hand soap, alcohol-based hand sanitizer, commercial bleach, and quaternary ammonium solution) were tested on a variety of surgical and patient examination gloves. The method of barrier performance evaluation was ASTM D5151-19,</i> Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves. <i>Our results indicated that the performance of the gloves after treatment was highly dependent on the composition of the medical gloves. In general, the surgical gloves in this study performed better than the patient examination gloves, regardless of the material from which they were made. Specifically, vinyl examination gloves tended to have poorer performance. In this study, the number of gloves available to test were limited and therefore statistical significance is beyond the scope of this project.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10512997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-57.1.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of healthcare providers doffing personal protective equipment, especially gloves, indicate that self-contamination does occur. Although generally this is not hazardous, working with particularly pathogenic organisms, such as Ebola virus and Clostridium difficile, can present a serious health risk. Decontaminating medical gloves before removal can reduce self-contamination and mitigate the spread of these types of pathogens. Also, in cases of extreme shortage, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has specific recommendations for decontaminating gloves for extended use. Reuse of medical gloves is strongly discouraged by both the CDC and Food and Drug Administration. This work seeks to lay a foundation of testing to evaluate whether a decontamination method is compatible for a given glove type and material. Four potential methods of decontamination (commercial hand soap, alcohol-based hand sanitizer, commercial bleach, and quaternary ammonium solution) were tested on a variety of surgical and patient examination gloves. The method of barrier performance evaluation was ASTM D5151-19, Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves. Our results indicated that the performance of the gloves after treatment was highly dependent on the composition of the medical gloves. In general, the surgical gloves in this study performed better than the patient examination gloves, regardless of the material from which they were made. Specifically, vinyl examination gloves tended to have poorer performance. In this study, the number of gloves available to test were limited and therefore statistical significance is beyond the scope of this project.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手套去污后的性能评估。
对医护人员脱下个人防护装备,尤其是手套的研究表明,确实会发生自我污染。尽管一般来说这并不危险,但与埃博拉病毒和艰难梭菌等特别致病的生物体一起工作可能会带来严重的健康风险。在移除医用手套之前对其进行去污可以减少自身污染并减缓这些类型病原体的传播。此外,在极度短缺的情况下,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)有关于长期使用手套去污的具体建议。美国疾病控制与预防中心和美国食品药品监督管理局都强烈反对重复使用医用手套。这项工作旨在为测试奠定基础,以评估去污方法是否适用于给定的手套类型和材料。在各种外科和患者检查手套上测试了四种潜在的去污方法(商用洗手液、酒精洗手液、商用漂白剂和季铵溶液)。阻隔性能评估的方法是ASTM D5151-19,医用手套中孔洞检测的标准测试方法。我们的结果表明,治疗后手套的性能在很大程度上取决于医用手套的成分。总的来说,本研究中的外科手套比患者检查手套表现更好,无论它们是用什么材料制成的。具体来说,乙烯基检查手套往往性能较差。在这项研究中,可供测试的手套数量有限,因此统计意义超出了本项目的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Gamma and X-ray Irradiation on Polymers Commonly Used in Healthcare Products. Effect of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization on Nitinol. Toward Enhanced Machine-Based Release in X-ray Sterilization. Beyond Endoscopes: Pilot Study of Surgical Instrument Lumen Inspection. Advantages and Limitations of Physical and Virtual Dose Mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1