Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Implants with Surveyed Crowns for Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11607/jomi.9761
Tae-Wook Jung, Yang-Jin Yi
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Implants with Surveyed Crowns for Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Tae-Wook Jung,&nbsp;Yang-Jin Yi","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the clinical outcomes of posterior implants with surveyed crowns in implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Internal-connection implants were inserted and restored with surveyed crowns at the most posterior molar regions of Kennedy class I or II in partially edentulous patients between 2007 and 2018. IARPDs were fabricated and functioned with or without clasps on the surveyed implant crowns. Clinical outcomes of biologic problems, mechanical problems, and marginal bone loss (MBL) through periapical and panoramic views were recorded and measured. The effects of sex, Kennedy classification, opposing dentition, and clasp existence on MBL were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test, and the implant length, crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio, and function period on MBL were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis at α = .05. <b>Results:</b> A total of 32 posterior implants were restored with a surveyed crown for IARPDs in 16 patients (7 men, 9 women; mean age: 69.3 ± 6.0 years). A total of 15 IARPDs were for the mandible (1 maxilla), and 13 were Kennedy class I (3 class II) before implant insertion. All internal-connection implants (15 bone-level and 17 tissue-level) with 7-mm (n = 12), 8.5-mm (n = 18), and 9-mm (n = 2) lengths were restored for 3 surveyed premolar crowns and 29 molar crowns (15 first molar and 14 second molar). The mean C/I ratio was 1.48. The mean function period of the implants was 60.9 ± 40.2 months (range: 14 to 155), and the mean MBL was 0.11 ± 0.36 mm. Only Kennedy class II showed significantly more MBL (<i>P</i> = .002). The implant survival and success rates were 96.9% and 90.6%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of this retrospective clinical study, mainly in mandibular IARPDs, implants with surveyed crowns showed high survival and success rates during short- to medium-term functions. Posterior implants with surveyed crowns appear to be a reliable alternative for free-end removable partial denture (RPD) patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of posterior implants with surveyed crowns in implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs). Materials and Methods: Internal-connection implants were inserted and restored with surveyed crowns at the most posterior molar regions of Kennedy class I or II in partially edentulous patients between 2007 and 2018. IARPDs were fabricated and functioned with or without clasps on the surveyed implant crowns. Clinical outcomes of biologic problems, mechanical problems, and marginal bone loss (MBL) through periapical and panoramic views were recorded and measured. The effects of sex, Kennedy classification, opposing dentition, and clasp existence on MBL were analyzed using Mann-Whitney test, and the implant length, crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio, and function period on MBL were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis at α = .05. Results: A total of 32 posterior implants were restored with a surveyed crown for IARPDs in 16 patients (7 men, 9 women; mean age: 69.3 ± 6.0 years). A total of 15 IARPDs were for the mandible (1 maxilla), and 13 were Kennedy class I (3 class II) before implant insertion. All internal-connection implants (15 bone-level and 17 tissue-level) with 7-mm (n = 12), 8.5-mm (n = 18), and 9-mm (n = 2) lengths were restored for 3 surveyed premolar crowns and 29 molar crowns (15 first molar and 14 second molar). The mean C/I ratio was 1.48. The mean function period of the implants was 60.9 ± 40.2 months (range: 14 to 155), and the mean MBL was 0.11 ± 0.36 mm. Only Kennedy class II showed significantly more MBL (P = .002). The implant survival and success rates were 96.9% and 90.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this retrospective clinical study, mainly in mandibular IARPDs, implants with surveyed crowns showed high survival and success rates during short- to medium-term functions. Posterior implants with surveyed crowns appear to be a reliable alternative for free-end removable partial denture (RPD) patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植辅助可摘局部义齿改良后牙冠临床效果的回顾性研究。
目的:评价种植辅助可摘局部义齿(iarpd)中带调查冠的后牙种植体的临床效果。材料和方法:2007年至2018年,对部分无牙患者在Kennedy I类或II类的大多数后磨牙区种植内连接种植体并使用调查冠进行修复。制作iarpd并在调查的种植冠上使用或不使用卡环。通过根尖周围和全景视图记录和测量生物问题、机械问题和边缘骨质流失(MBL)的临床结果。采用Mann-Whitney检验分析性别、Kennedy分类、反牙列和卡环是否存在对MBL的影响,采用多元回归分析种植体长度、冠与种植体(C/I)比和功能周期对MBL的影响,α = 0.05。结果:16例iarpd患者(男性7例,女性9例;平均年龄:69.3±6.0岁)。下颌骨iarpd 15例(上颌1例),种植体置入前Kennedy I级13例(II级3例)。所有的内连接种植体(15个骨水平和17个组织水平),长度分别为7mm (n = 12)、8.5 mm (n = 18)和9 mm (n = 2),修复了3个前磨牙冠和29个磨牙冠(15个第一磨牙和14个第二磨牙)。平均C/I比率为1.48。种植体的平均功能周期为60.9±40.2个月(范围:14 ~ 155),平均MBL为0.11±0.36 mm。只有Kennedy II级显示MBL显著增加(P = 0.002)。种植体成活率96.9%,种植体成功率90.6%。结论:在本回顾性临床研究的局限性内,主要是在下颌iarpd中,调查冠种植体在中短期功能中具有较高的存活率和成功率。对游离端可摘局部义齿(RPD)患者来说,带调查冠的后牙种植体是一种可靠的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
期刊最新文献
Peri-implant Parameters of Dental Implants Inserted in Prefabricated Microvascular Fibular Flaps: A Retrospective Study. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis. Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Using a Combination of Free Gingival Graft Strip with Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix or Free Gingival Graft Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of Labial Split-Thickness Eversion Periosteoplasty for Soft Tissue Management in Posterior Mandibular Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Procedures: A Prospective Clinical Study. Porcine Resorbable Collagen Matrix Shows Good Incorporation of Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin In Vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1