Exploring Perception of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients about the Quality of Life in Hospice based and Home based Palliative Care: A Mixed Method Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Indian Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-12 DOI:10.25259/IJPC_92_2021
Dhriti Patel, Parimalkumar Patel, Monal Ramani, Khushbu Makadia
{"title":"Exploring Perception of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients about the Quality of Life in Hospice based and Home based Palliative Care: A Mixed Method Study.","authors":"Dhriti Patel,&nbsp;Parimalkumar Patel,&nbsp;Monal Ramani,&nbsp;Khushbu Makadia","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_92_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study were to evaluate the perceptions and performance of terminally ill cancer patients regarding the quality of palliative care at different settings and to measure their quality of life (QOL) at the end of life.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This comparative, parallel and mixed method study was conducted at the Community Oncology Centre, Ahmedabad, among 68 terminally ill cancer patients as per inclusion criteria; who were receiving hospice (HS<b>)-</b>based and home (HO)-based palliative care under 2 months permitted by the Indian Council of Medical Research. In this parallel and mixed method study, qualitative findings were supplemented by quantitative data with both components executed simultaneously. Interview data were recorded by taking extensive notes during interviews along with an audio recording. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a thematic approach was adopted. QoL questionnaire ('FACIT© System') was used for the assessment of QOL in terms of four dimensions. Data were analysed using the appropriate statistical test on Microsoft Excel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative data (primary component) analysed under five themes - staff behaviour, comfort and peace, enough and consistent care, nutrition and moral support, in the present study favours a HS-based setting more than a HO-based setting. Among all four subscale scores, physical well-being and emotional well-being subscale scores were statistically significantly associated with the place of palliative care. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score was high among patients getting HO-based palliative (mean = 67.64) care than HS-based palliative care (mean = 56.56) and the difference between total FACT-G scores was statistically significant (unpaired <i>t</i>-test = 2.20, <i>P</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, with the primary component favouring HS care and higher scores obtained in HO-based patients, the present study advocates the necessity for palliative services to expand their coverage regardless of whether they are provided at HS or HO, as it has improved the QOL of cancer patients significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/f1/IJPC-29-057.PMC9945234.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_92_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the perceptions and performance of terminally ill cancer patients regarding the quality of palliative care at different settings and to measure their quality of life (QOL) at the end of life.

Material and methods: This comparative, parallel and mixed method study was conducted at the Community Oncology Centre, Ahmedabad, among 68 terminally ill cancer patients as per inclusion criteria; who were receiving hospice (HS)-based and home (HO)-based palliative care under 2 months permitted by the Indian Council of Medical Research. In this parallel and mixed method study, qualitative findings were supplemented by quantitative data with both components executed simultaneously. Interview data were recorded by taking extensive notes during interviews along with an audio recording. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a thematic approach was adopted. QoL questionnaire ('FACIT© System') was used for the assessment of QOL in terms of four dimensions. Data were analysed using the appropriate statistical test on Microsoft Excel.

Results: The qualitative data (primary component) analysed under five themes - staff behaviour, comfort and peace, enough and consistent care, nutrition and moral support, in the present study favours a HS-based setting more than a HO-based setting. Among all four subscale scores, physical well-being and emotional well-being subscale scores were statistically significantly associated with the place of palliative care. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score was high among patients getting HO-based palliative (mean = 67.64) care than HS-based palliative care (mean = 56.56) and the difference between total FACT-G scores was statistically significant (unpaired t-test = 2.20, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Overall, with the primary component favouring HS care and higher scores obtained in HO-based patients, the present study advocates the necessity for palliative services to expand their coverage regardless of whether they are provided at HS or HO, as it has improved the QOL of cancer patients significantly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索临终癌症患者对临终关怀和家庭姑息治疗中生活质量的认知:一项混合方法研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估癌症晚期患者在不同环境下对姑息治疗质量的认知和表现,并测量他们在生命结束时的生活质量(QOL)。材料和方法:这项比较、平行和混合方法研究是在艾哈迈达巴德社区肿瘤中心根据纳入标准对68名癌症绝症患者进行的;在印度医学研究委员会允许的2个月内接受临终关怀和家庭姑息治疗的患者。在这项平行和混合方法研究中,定性结果由同时执行两个组成部分的定量数据补充。访谈数据是通过在访谈过程中做大量笔记和录音来记录的。访谈记录逐字逐句,并采用专题方法。生活质量问卷(“FACIT©System”)用于从四个维度评估生活质量。在Microsoft Excel上使用适当的统计测试对数据进行了分析。结果:在本研究中,在五个主题下分析的定性数据(主要成分)——员工行为、舒适与和平、足够且一致的护理、营养和道德支持——更倾向于基于HS的环境,而不是基于HO的环境。在所有四个分量表得分中,身体健康和情绪健康分量表得分与姑息治疗的地点有统计学显著相关性。癌症综合治疗功能评估(FACT-G)总分在接受基于HO-的姑息治疗的患者中(平均值=67.64)高于基于HS-的姑息治疗(平均值=56.56),且FACT-G总分之间的差异具有统计学意义(非配对t检验=2.20,P=0.03),由于主要组成部分有利于HS护理和在HO患者中获得更高的分数,本研究主张无论是在HS还是HO提供姑息治疗服务,都有必要扩大其覆盖范围,因为它显著改善了癌症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Indian Journal of Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Indian Journal of Palliative Care. You have free full text access to recent issues of the journal. The links connect you to •guidelines and systematic reviews in palliative care and oncology •a directory of palliative care programmes in India and IAPC membership •Palliative Care Formulary, book reviews and other educational material •guidance on statistical tests and medical writing.
期刊最新文献
Debunking Palliative Care Myths: Assessing the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini) Improving Palliative Care Research Reporting: A Guide to Reporting Guidelines Quality of Life Determinants among Breast Cancer Women Undergoing Treatment in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study Physicians’ Perceived Barriers and Willingness to Initiate Advance Care Planning with Young Adults Living with Cardiometabolic Diseases A Multicentric Field Test to Study the Validity and Feasibility of the SHS-tool to Screen for Serious Health-related Suffering in Adult Patients with Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1