Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal airway and tongue space following treatment with Herbst and AdvanSync appliances : A prospective randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s00056-023-00449-3
Suman Arora, Seema Grover, Pandurangan Harikrishnan, Ashish Dabas, Namrata Dogra, Jasmine Nindra
{"title":"Cephalometric evaluation of pharyngeal airway and tongue space following treatment with Herbst and AdvanSync appliances : A prospective randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Suman Arora, Seema Grover, Pandurangan Harikrishnan, Ashish Dabas, Namrata Dogra, Jasmine Nindra","doi":"10.1007/s00056-023-00449-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes after treatment with fixed functional appliances-Herbst and AdvanSync™ (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) appliances-in skeletal class II patients in pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this randomized, controlled trial, 40 patients (21 male, 19 female) were divided into two groups-a Herbst group (mean age 12.6 ± 0.67 years) and an AdvanSync group (mean age 12.8 ± 0.66 years). Pre- and posttreatment (appliance therapy duration-8 months) lateral cephalograms were traced using a software program to evaluate pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nasopharyngeal airway, velopharyngeal airway, glossopharyngeal airway, and hypopharyngeal airway increased in the Herbst group by 2.12 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.33 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.40 mm (p ≤ 0.01), and 1.57 mm (p ≤ 0.05), while in the AdvanSync group the increases were 1.89 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.21 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.18 mm (p ≤ 0.001), and 1.53 mm (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. In the Herbst group, tongue length and height increases were 2.04 mm (p ≤ 0.01) and 3.74 mm (p ≤ 0.001), while the values in the AdvanSync group were 2.41 mm (p ≤ 0.05) and 2.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001). The change of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane was 0.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the Herbst group and 0.77 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the AdvanSync group. The velopharyngeal airway dimension was correlated positively with that of the retroglossal oropharyngeal airway, which in-turn positively correlated with the laryngopharyngeal airway which correlated well with the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The airway dimensions and tongue parameters increased significantly in both treatment groups in the present study. These changes were higher in the Herbst appliance than in the AdvanSync group, except for the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane. A significant difference between the pharyngeal airways was found only for the retropalatal oropharyngeal airway.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00449-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes after treatment with fixed functional appliances-Herbst and AdvanSync™ (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA) appliances-in skeletal class II patients in pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms.

Methods: For this randomized, controlled trial, 40 patients (21 male, 19 female) were divided into two groups-a Herbst group (mean age 12.6 ± 0.67 years) and an AdvanSync group (mean age 12.8 ± 0.66 years). Pre- and posttreatment (appliance therapy duration-8 months) lateral cephalograms were traced using a software program to evaluate pharyngeal airway and tongue space changes.

Results: Nasopharyngeal airway, velopharyngeal airway, glossopharyngeal airway, and hypopharyngeal airway increased in the Herbst group by 2.12 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.33 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 2.40 mm (p ≤ 0.01), and 1.57 mm (p ≤ 0.05), while in the AdvanSync group the increases were 1.89 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.21 mm (p ≤ 0.001), 1.18 mm (p ≤ 0.001), and 1.53 mm (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. In the Herbst group, tongue length and height increases were 2.04 mm (p ≤ 0.01) and 3.74 mm (p ≤ 0.001), while the values in the AdvanSync group were 2.41 mm (p ≤ 0.05) and 2.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001). The change of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane was 0.69 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the Herbst group and 0.77 mm (p ≤ 0.001) in the AdvanSync group. The velopharyngeal airway dimension was correlated positively with that of the retroglossal oropharyngeal airway, which in-turn positively correlated with the laryngopharyngeal airway which correlated well with the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane.

Conclusions: The airway dimensions and tongue parameters increased significantly in both treatment groups in the present study. These changes were higher in the Herbst appliance than in the AdvanSync group, except for the distance of the tongue tip from the lower occlusal plane. A significant difference between the pharyngeal airways was found only for the retropalatal oropharyngeal airway.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Herbst 和 AdvanSync矫治器治疗后咽部气道和舌间隙的头颅测量评估 :前瞻性随机临床试验。
目的评估并比较骨骼等级为 II 的患者在使用固定功能矫治器--Herbst 和 AdvanSync™ (Ormco,Orange,CA,USA)矫治器治疗后,咽部气道和舌间隙在治疗前和治疗后侧位头相图上的变化:在这项随机对照试验中,40 名患者(21 名男性,19 名女性)被分为两组--Herbst 组(平均年龄为 12.6±0.67 岁)和 AdvanSync 组(平均年龄为 12.8±0.66 岁)。治疗前和治疗后(矫治器疗程-8 个月)的侧位头影均使用软件程序进行描记,以评估咽部气道和舌间隙的变化:结果:Herbst 组的鼻咽气道、velopharyngeal 气道、舌咽气道和下咽气道分别增加了 2.12 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)、2.33 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)、2.40 毫米(p ≤ 0.01)和 1.57 毫米(p ≤ 0.05),而 AdvanSync 组分别增加了 1.89 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)、1.21 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)、1.18 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)和 1.53 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)。Herbst 组的舌长和舌高分别增加了 2.04 毫米(p ≤ 0.01)和 3.74 毫米(p ≤ 0.001),而 AdvanSync 组的数值分别为 2.41 毫米(p ≤ 0.05)和 2.69 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)。Herbst 组的舌尖与下咬合面的距离变化为 0.69 毫米(p ≤ 0.001),AdvanSync 组的舌尖与下咬合面的距离变化为 0.77 毫米(p ≤ 0.001)。咽后气道尺寸与舌后口咽气道尺寸呈正相关,而舌后口咽气道尺寸与喉咽气道尺寸呈正相关,喉咽气道尺寸与舌尖距下咬合平面的距离呈良好相关:结论:在本研究中,两个治疗组的气道尺寸和舌参数都有明显增加。除舌尖与下咬合面的距离外,Herbst矫治器组的这些变化高于AdvanSync组。只有在腭后口咽气道方面发现了咽气道之间的明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Effect of tube debonding on the enamel surface in vitro : Evaluation with optical coherence tomography. Development and in vitro testing of an orthodontic miniscrew for use in the mandible. The effects of professional expertise on perceptions of treatment need in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a comparison between orthodontists, general dentists, and lay people in Germany. Mitteilungen der DGKFO. Effect of orthodontic extraction of mandibular premolars on third molar angulation after treatment with fixed appliances : A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1