Validity and feasibility of a seated push-up test to indicate skeletal muscle mass in well-functioning older adults.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2021.2023931
Puttipong Poncumhak, Arpassanan Wiyanad, Chaitawat Siriyakul, Nimit Kosura, Pipatana Amatachaya, Sugalya Amatachaya
{"title":"Validity and feasibility of a seated push-up test to indicate skeletal muscle mass in well-functioning older adults.","authors":"Puttipong Poncumhak,&nbsp;Arpassanan Wiyanad,&nbsp;Chaitawat Siriyakul,&nbsp;Nimit Kosura,&nbsp;Pipatana Amatachaya,&nbsp;Sugalya Amatachaya","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2021.2023931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is a major component of the human body (> 30% of the body-weight) and plays crucial role in many bodily functions. However, SMM assessments require a complex and costly machine, which delays the ability to detect abnormalities related to SMM decline and, subsequently, reduces the effectiveness of the clinical management of older adults.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to: 1) assess the correlation between upper limb loading during a seated push-up test (ULL-SPUT) and SMM (concurrent validity); 2) compare the SMM of participants who passed and failed a seated push-up test (SPUT; discriminant validity); and 3) explore the ability of a failed SPUT to identify older individuals with low SMM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 40, age approximately 73 years) were cross-sectionally assessed for their SMM using a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis, and SPUTs were evaluated using digital push-up loading devices that were the size of clinical push-up boards, in three starting positions: 1) high; 2) ring, and 3) long sitting positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ULL-SPUT, especially in a ring sitting position, was significantly correlated to SMM (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.457-0.608, p < .005). The SMM and ULL-SPUT were significantly different between participants who passed and failed the SPUT (p < .05). Failure to complete the SPUT - that is, being unable to lift the body up from the floor during the test - showed an excellent ability to indicate participants with an SMM of < 28% of their body-weight (sensitivity > 83%, specificity > 82%, area under the curve = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inability to lift the body up from the floor during sitting using the upper limbs can be used as a screening tool to indicate those with low SMM. Such a simple screening measure may enhance the distribution of healthcare services across various community- and home-based settings, particularly during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, when hospital services are limited for many individuals, including older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":"39 3","pages":"623-630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.2023931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) is a major component of the human body (> 30% of the body-weight) and plays crucial role in many bodily functions. However, SMM assessments require a complex and costly machine, which delays the ability to detect abnormalities related to SMM decline and, subsequently, reduces the effectiveness of the clinical management of older adults.

Purpose: This study aimed to: 1) assess the correlation between upper limb loading during a seated push-up test (ULL-SPUT) and SMM (concurrent validity); 2) compare the SMM of participants who passed and failed a seated push-up test (SPUT; discriminant validity); and 3) explore the ability of a failed SPUT to identify older individuals with low SMM.

Methods: Participants (n = 40, age approximately 73 years) were cross-sectionally assessed for their SMM using a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis, and SPUTs were evaluated using digital push-up loading devices that were the size of clinical push-up boards, in three starting positions: 1) high; 2) ring, and 3) long sitting positions.

Results: The ULL-SPUT, especially in a ring sitting position, was significantly correlated to SMM (rs = 0.457-0.608, p < .005). The SMM and ULL-SPUT were significantly different between participants who passed and failed the SPUT (p < .05). Failure to complete the SPUT - that is, being unable to lift the body up from the floor during the test - showed an excellent ability to indicate participants with an SMM of < 28% of their body-weight (sensitivity > 83%, specificity > 82%, area under the curve = 0.93).

Conclusions: The inability to lift the body up from the floor during sitting using the upper limbs can be used as a screening tool to indicate those with low SMM. Such a simple screening measure may enhance the distribution of healthcare services across various community- and home-based settings, particularly during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, when hospital services are limited for many individuals, including older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坐姿俯卧撑测试在功能良好的老年人中显示骨骼肌质量的有效性和可行性。
简介:骨骼肌(SMM)是人体的主要组成部分(> 30%的体重),在许多身体功能中起着至关重要的作用。然而,SMM评估需要一个复杂和昂贵的机器,这延迟了检测与SMM下降相关的异常的能力,随后降低了老年人临床管理的有效性。目的:本研究旨在:1)评估坐式俯卧撑测试(ULL-SPUT)时上肢负荷与SMM(并发效度)的相关性;2)比较坐式俯卧撑测试(SPUT)通过与不通过者的SMM;区分效度);3)探讨失败的SPUT识别低SMM老年人的能力。方法:使用便携式生物阻抗分析对参与者(n = 40,年龄约73岁)的SMM进行横断面评估,并使用临床俯卧撑板大小的数字俯卧撑加载装置评估sput,在三个起始位置:1)高;2)环形,3)长时间坐姿。结果:ULL-SPUT与SMM显著相关(rs = 0.457 ~ 0.608, p = 83%,特异性> 82%,曲线下面积= 0.93),尤以环形坐姿者为最。结论:坐着时上肢不能将身体从地板上抬起来可以作为低SMM的筛查工具。这种简单的筛查措施可能会加强各种社区和家庭环境中医疗保健服务的分配,特别是在冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间,因为包括老年人在内的许多人的医院服务有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of experiential learning in shaping physical therapy student self-efficacy for neurologic practice: A mixed methods study. Effectiveness of the Spencer technique on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with frozen shoulder: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Investigating acute care physical therapy in general medicine: a retrospective analysis of utilization and effectiveness. Functional immersive rehabilitation for a severely burned patient with refractory pain: A case report. Effect of an evidence-based modified developmental physiotherapy intervention on muscle tone, motor functions, and trunk control in a child with hereditary spastic paraplegia type 47: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1