Self-Triage Use, Subsequent Healthcare Utilization, and Diagnoses: A Retrospective Study of Process and Clinical Outcomes Following Self-Triage and Self-Scheduling for Ear or Hearing Symptoms.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333928231168121
Frederick North, Teresa B Jensen, Robert J Stroebel, Elissa M Nelson, Brenda J Johnson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer L Pecina, Brian A Crum
{"title":"Self-Triage Use, Subsequent Healthcare Utilization, and Diagnoses: A Retrospective Study of Process and Clinical Outcomes Following Self-Triage and Self-Scheduling for Ear or Hearing Symptoms.","authors":"Frederick North,&nbsp;Teresa B Jensen,&nbsp;Robert J Stroebel,&nbsp;Elissa M Nelson,&nbsp;Brenda J Johnson,&nbsp;Matthew C Thompson,&nbsp;Jennifer L Pecina,&nbsp;Brian A Crum","doi":"10.1177/23333928231168121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-triage is becoming more widespread, but little is known about the people who are using online self-triage tools and their outcomes. For self-triage researchers, there are significant barriers to capturing subsequent healthcare outcomes. Our integrated healthcare system was able to capture subsequent healthcare utilization of individuals who used self-triage integrated with self-scheduling of provider visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined healthcare utilization and diagnoses after patients had used self-triage and self-scheduling for ear or hearing symptoms. Outcomes and counts of office visits, telemedicine interactions, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were captured. Diagnosis codes associated with subsequent provider visits were dichotomously categorized as being associated with ear or hearing concerns or not. Nonvisit care encounters of patient-initiated messages, nurse triage calls, and clinical communications were also captured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 2168 self-triage uses, we were able to capture subsequent healthcare encounters within 7 days of the self-triage for 80.5% (1745/2168). In subsequent 1092 office visits with diagnoses, 83.1% (891/1092) of the uses were associated with relevant ear, nose and throat diagnoses. Only 0.24% (4/1662) of patients with captured outcomes were associated with a hospitalization within 7 days. Self-triage resulted in a self-scheduled office visit in 7.2% (126/1745). Office visits resulting from a self-scheduled visit had significantly fewer combined non-visit care encounters per office visit (fewer combined nurse triage calls, patient messages, and clinical communication messages) than office visits that were not self-scheduled (-0.51; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.29; <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In an appropriate healthcare setting, self-triage outcomes can be captured in a high percentage of uses to examine for safety, patient adherence to recommendations, and efficiency of self-triage. With the ear or hearing self-triage, most uses had subsequent visit diagnoses relevant to ear or hearing, so most patients appeared to be selecting the appropriate self-triage pathway for their symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"10 ","pages":"23333928231168121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/a9/10.1177_23333928231168121.PMC10123887.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928231168121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Self-triage is becoming more widespread, but little is known about the people who are using online self-triage tools and their outcomes. For self-triage researchers, there are significant barriers to capturing subsequent healthcare outcomes. Our integrated healthcare system was able to capture subsequent healthcare utilization of individuals who used self-triage integrated with self-scheduling of provider visits.

Methods: We retrospectively examined healthcare utilization and diagnoses after patients had used self-triage and self-scheduling for ear or hearing symptoms. Outcomes and counts of office visits, telemedicine interactions, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were captured. Diagnosis codes associated with subsequent provider visits were dichotomously categorized as being associated with ear or hearing concerns or not. Nonvisit care encounters of patient-initiated messages, nurse triage calls, and clinical communications were also captured.

Results: For 2168 self-triage uses, we were able to capture subsequent healthcare encounters within 7 days of the self-triage for 80.5% (1745/2168). In subsequent 1092 office visits with diagnoses, 83.1% (891/1092) of the uses were associated with relevant ear, nose and throat diagnoses. Only 0.24% (4/1662) of patients with captured outcomes were associated with a hospitalization within 7 days. Self-triage resulted in a self-scheduled office visit in 7.2% (126/1745). Office visits resulting from a self-scheduled visit had significantly fewer combined non-visit care encounters per office visit (fewer combined nurse triage calls, patient messages, and clinical communication messages) than office visits that were not self-scheduled (-0.51; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.29; P < .0001).

Conclusion: In an appropriate healthcare setting, self-triage outcomes can be captured in a high percentage of uses to examine for safety, patient adherence to recommendations, and efficiency of self-triage. With the ear or hearing self-triage, most uses had subsequent visit diagnoses relevant to ear or hearing, so most patients appeared to be selecting the appropriate self-triage pathway for their symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我分类的使用,随后的医疗保健利用和诊断:对耳部或听力症状自我分类和自我安排的过程和临床结果的回顾性研究
背景:自我分诊正变得越来越普遍,但人们对使用在线自我分诊工具的人及其结果知之甚少。对于自我分类研究人员来说,在获取后续医疗保健结果方面存在重大障碍。我们的综合医疗保健系统能够捕获使用自我分诊与自我安排提供者访问的个人的后续医疗保健利用情况。方法:我们回顾性调查患者使用自我分类和自我安排耳部或听力症状后的医疗保健利用和诊断。记录了办公室就诊、远程医疗互动、急诊科就诊和住院的结果和计数。与随后的提供者访问相关的诊断代码分为与耳朵或听力问题相关或不相关。非访问护理遇到的患者发起的信息,护士分诊电话和临床通信也被捕获。结果:对于2168例自我分类使用,80.5%(1745/2168)能够在自我分类后7天内捕获后续医疗保健遭遇。在随后的1092次就诊诊断中,83.1%(891/1092)的使用与相关的耳鼻喉诊断相关。只有0.24%(4/1662)的患者在7天内住院。自我分类导致7.2%的患者自行安排办公室就诊(126/1745)。与非自我安排的办公室就诊相比,自我安排就诊导致的每次办公室就诊的非就诊护理次数(护士分诊电话、患者信息和临床沟通信息的总和更少)显著减少(-0.51;95% CI, -0.72 ~ -0.29;结论:在适当的医疗环境中,自我分诊结果可以在高百分比的使用中捕获,以检查安全性、患者对建议的依从性和自我分诊的效率。通过耳或听力自我分诊,大多数患者都有与耳或听力相关的后续就诊诊断,因此大多数患者似乎都在为他们的症状选择适当的自我分诊途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Personality Traits, Coping Strategies, and 5-Year Change in Blood Pressure in Young Adults: The African-PREDICT Study. Developing a Physical Activity Program for Mothers and Their Children at Risk for Diabetes. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Utilization among Medically Underserved Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Need for an Artificial Intelligence-based Diabetes Care Management System in India and the United States. Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1