{"title":"Premixed Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Setting Reaction in Primary Molar Pulpotomies.","authors":"Erika Peters, Evelina Kratunova, Flavia Lamberghini, Sahar Alrayyes, Satish B Alapati","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess the setting of premixed mineral trioxide aggregate (NuSmile NeoPUTTY) when used as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars, restored in a single visit, and to compare the effect of overlying materials, including zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and stainless steel crowns (SSC), on the microhardness of the NeoPUTTY.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> Forty-eight extracted primary molars were prepared with the standard pulpotomy technique. Approximately three mm of NeoPUTTY were placed on the pulpal floor of each tooth. The teeth were divided into four groups according to restorative material: (1) control group-none; (2) RMGIC; (3) ZOE; and (4) ZOE and SSC. Groups 2, 3 and 4 specimens were placed in artificially simulated oral cavity conditions. After 24 hours, all teeth were sectioned mesiodistally and polished. Microhardness was then measured in Knoop scales (HK) at one mm, two mm and three mm away from the NeoPUTTY-overlying material interface following the application of a 25-gf load force for 30 seconds at each site. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the NeoPUTTY microhardness values between groups at each depth as well as between the three different depths within each group (<i>P</i> <0.05).<br/> <b>Results:</b> No statistically significant differences in mean HK values (57.9 to 62.3 range) were found between groups at each depth, or between depths within each group (Group 1,<i>P</i> =0.328; Group 2, <i>P</i> =0.74; Group 3, <i>P</i> =0.293; Group 4, <i>P</i> =0.788).<br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> The setting reaction of NeoPUTTY, as a function of microhardness, was not affected by the presence or type of overlying material used in a single-visit pulpotomy. This <i>in vitro</i> study found no evidence against the immediate restoration of primary molar pulpotomies done with NeoPUTTY.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the setting of premixed mineral trioxide aggregate (NuSmile NeoPUTTY) when used as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars, restored in a single visit, and to compare the effect of overlying materials, including zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and stainless steel crowns (SSC), on the microhardness of the NeoPUTTY. Methods: Forty-eight extracted primary molars were prepared with the standard pulpotomy technique. Approximately three mm of NeoPUTTY were placed on the pulpal floor of each tooth. The teeth were divided into four groups according to restorative material: (1) control group-none; (2) RMGIC; (3) ZOE; and (4) ZOE and SSC. Groups 2, 3 and 4 specimens were placed in artificially simulated oral cavity conditions. After 24 hours, all teeth were sectioned mesiodistally and polished. Microhardness was then measured in Knoop scales (HK) at one mm, two mm and three mm away from the NeoPUTTY-overlying material interface following the application of a 25-gf load force for 30 seconds at each site. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the NeoPUTTY microhardness values between groups at each depth as well as between the three different depths within each group (P <0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences in mean HK values (57.9 to 62.3 range) were found between groups at each depth, or between depths within each group (Group 1,P =0.328; Group 2, P =0.74; Group 3, P =0.293; Group 4, P =0.788). Conclusion: The setting reaction of NeoPUTTY, as a function of microhardness, was not affected by the presence or type of overlying material used in a single-visit pulpotomy. This in vitro study found no evidence against the immediate restoration of primary molar pulpotomies done with NeoPUTTY.
期刊介绍:
Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.