{"title":"Performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire in a chronic pain population: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Lene Therese Bergerud Linnemørken, Helle Stangeland, Silje Endresen Reme, Synne Øien Stensland","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain-related fear, anxiety, and avoidance may play key roles in the chronification of pain and related disability. For practitioners, knowledge about the source or drivers of these fears, including patients' exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and related posttraumatic stress symptoms, could be particularly helpful in guiding their treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate whether the use of a brief screening for PTEs could help inform chronic pain treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) was assessed among 567 adult patients (59% women, mean age 48.1 years) meeting at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, and 20 months temporal stability of the SLESQ, assessing exposure to 14 specific trauma types followed by a 15th item capturing exposure to \"other events,\" were assessed through digital administration and follow-up interviews with 55 participants. The qualitative responses of 158 participants reporting exposure to \"other events\" were reviewed and assessed based on fulfillment of the A Criterion for traumatic events in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The acceptability of the SLESQ was assessed in clinical interviews with 12 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SLESQ demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (70.0%), high specificity (94.9%), and moderate temporal stability (κ = 0.66, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Participants' qualitative elaborations of \"other events\" were largely (76.3%) consistent with Criterion A events. The screening was well accepted and welcomed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the use of a brief screening for potential trauma may be helpful to guide clinical practice in chronic pain settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":"e1072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pain-related fear, anxiety, and avoidance may play key roles in the chronification of pain and related disability. For practitioners, knowledge about the source or drivers of these fears, including patients' exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and related posttraumatic stress symptoms, could be particularly helpful in guiding their treatment approach.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether the use of a brief screening for PTEs could help inform chronic pain treatment.
Methods: The performance and acceptability of the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire (SLESQ) was assessed among 567 adult patients (59% women, mean age 48.1 years) meeting at a hospital outpatient pain clinic. The sensitivity, specificity, and 20 months temporal stability of the SLESQ, assessing exposure to 14 specific trauma types followed by a 15th item capturing exposure to "other events," were assessed through digital administration and follow-up interviews with 55 participants. The qualitative responses of 158 participants reporting exposure to "other events" were reviewed and assessed based on fulfillment of the A Criterion for traumatic events in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. The acceptability of the SLESQ was assessed in clinical interviews with 12 participants.
Results: The SLESQ demonstrated acceptable sensitivity (70.0%), high specificity (94.9%), and moderate temporal stability (κ = 0.66, P < 0.001). Participants' qualitative elaborations of "other events" were largely (76.3%) consistent with Criterion A events. The screening was well accepted and welcomed.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the use of a brief screening for potential trauma may be helpful to guide clinical practice in chronic pain settings.