{"title":"Understanding the Evolution of Environment, Social and Governance Research: Novel Implications From Bibliometric and Network Analysis.","authors":"Amit Kumar Singh, Yifang Zhang, Anu","doi":"10.1177/0193841X221121244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the scarcity of comprehensive review studies in the literature, this bibliometric analysis thrives on taking a scientific approach to delivering quantitative and qualitative information on the ever-evolving field of ESG. Utilizing the performance analysis and science mapping techniques which includes citation analysis, co-word analysis, the study reports a holistic overview of 693 (ESG) papers from 1991 to 2020. The paper aims to provide a unified perspective on the evolution and further identify future research directions in this field. The findings point to the most important countries, authors, studies, and top journals in this field. Results show that published articles on ESG gained momentum after 2006; however, an exponential rise is being observed in the past 5 years, with research focusing on sustainable finance, sustainable development, ESG, and CSR with themes extending to risk management, stakeholder engagement, and portfolio construction, among others. Furthermore, the research identifies how the practice of ESG reporting affects many variables such as financial performance, social performance, environmental performance, and sustainability score. The findings also indicate that the field of ESG is still evolving, with numerous unexplored themes. The work is novel and relevant on the pretext that it uses the Scopus and Web of Science databases for bibliometric mapping, whereas previous studies have used the Scopus database but have lacked a robust methodology, so the findings of this study provided strong support for identifying emerging paradigms in the ESG literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":"47 2","pages":"350-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X221121244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Given the scarcity of comprehensive review studies in the literature, this bibliometric analysis thrives on taking a scientific approach to delivering quantitative and qualitative information on the ever-evolving field of ESG. Utilizing the performance analysis and science mapping techniques which includes citation analysis, co-word analysis, the study reports a holistic overview of 693 (ESG) papers from 1991 to 2020. The paper aims to provide a unified perspective on the evolution and further identify future research directions in this field. The findings point to the most important countries, authors, studies, and top journals in this field. Results show that published articles on ESG gained momentum after 2006; however, an exponential rise is being observed in the past 5 years, with research focusing on sustainable finance, sustainable development, ESG, and CSR with themes extending to risk management, stakeholder engagement, and portfolio construction, among others. Furthermore, the research identifies how the practice of ESG reporting affects many variables such as financial performance, social performance, environmental performance, and sustainability score. The findings also indicate that the field of ESG is still evolving, with numerous unexplored themes. The work is novel and relevant on the pretext that it uses the Scopus and Web of Science databases for bibliometric mapping, whereas previous studies have used the Scopus database but have lacked a robust methodology, so the findings of this study provided strong support for identifying emerging paradigms in the ESG literature.
鉴于文献中缺乏全面的综述研究,这种文献计量学分析在采用科学方法提供不断发展的ESG领域的定量和定性信息方面蓬勃发展。本研究利用引文分析、共词分析等绩效分析和科学制图技术,对1991年至2020年693篇ESG论文进行了整体综述。本文旨在为该领域的发展提供一个统一的视角,并进一步确定未来的研究方向。这些发现指向了该领域最重要的国家、作者、研究和顶级期刊。结果表明:2006年以后,ESG相关文章的发表呈上升趋势;然而,在过去的5年里,研究呈指数级增长,研究重点是可持续金融、可持续发展、ESG和CSR,主题扩展到风险管理、利益相关者参与和投资组合构建等。此外,该研究确定了ESG报告的实践如何影响许多变量,如财务绩效、社会绩效、环境绩效和可持续性得分。研究结果还表明,ESG领域仍在发展,有许多尚未探索的主题。这项工作是新颖和相关的,因为它使用了Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行文献计量制图,而之前的研究使用了Scopus数据库,但缺乏可靠的方法,因此这项研究的发现为识别ESG文献中的新兴范式提供了强有力的支持。
期刊介绍:
Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".