Nature-Based Pediatric Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-26 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2023.2204924
Hannah K Burke, Lynette M Burke, Colleen G Hacker, Shelly J Lane
{"title":"Nature-Based Pediatric Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Hannah K Burke, Lynette M Burke, Colleen G Hacker, Shelly J Lane","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2023.2204924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our purpose was to explore the scope of nature-based interventions used in pediatric occupational therapy and identify gaps in existing literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. We searched CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLine, and gray literature, and we hand-searched included articles' references. We included studies published through June, 2021 that were in English, described a service provided by occupational therapists, with a population with at least 50% of participants ages 0-21 years, with nature as a primary context and treatment modality. Studies were excluded if they only described animal-assisted therapies or human-made structures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 articles (two reporting quasi-experimental studies; 10 gray literature) met inclusion criteria. Articles described a variety of interventions, but there was a lack of rigor in included articles and no clear conceptualization of nature-based pediatric occupational therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite practitioner interest in the topic, there are two primary gaps in the literature: lack of a clear conceptualization of nature-based practices for occupational therapy and lack of articulation of the unique contribution of occupational therapy to nature-based practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"96-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2204924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Our purpose was to explore the scope of nature-based interventions used in pediatric occupational therapy and identify gaps in existing literature.

Methods: This scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework. We searched CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLine, and gray literature, and we hand-searched included articles' references. We included studies published through June, 2021 that were in English, described a service provided by occupational therapists, with a population with at least 50% of participants ages 0-21 years, with nature as a primary context and treatment modality. Studies were excluded if they only described animal-assisted therapies or human-made structures.

Results: A total of 12 articles (two reporting quasi-experimental studies; 10 gray literature) met inclusion criteria. Articles described a variety of interventions, but there was a lack of rigor in included articles and no clear conceptualization of nature-based pediatric occupational therapy.

Conclusions: Despite practitioner interest in the topic, there are two primary gaps in the literature: lack of a clear conceptualization of nature-based practices for occupational therapy and lack of articulation of the unique contribution of occupational therapy to nature-based practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于自然的儿科作业疗法:范围审查。
目的:我们的目的是探索儿科职业疗法中使用的基于自然的干预措施的范围,并找出现有文献中的不足之处:本次范围界定综述以 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法论以及范围界定综述扩展的系统综述和元分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA-ScR) 框架为指导。我们检索了 CINAHL、PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Embase、MEDLine 和灰色文献,并手工检索了收录文章的参考文献。我们收录了截至 2021 年 6 月发表的研究,这些研究均为英文,描述了职业治疗师提供的服务,研究对象中至少有 50% 的参与者年龄在 0-21 岁之间,研究的主要背景和治疗方式均为自然。如果研究仅描述了动物辅助疗法或人造结构,则排除在外:共有 12 篇文章(2 篇报告准实验研究;10 篇灰色文献)符合纳入标准。文章描述了各种干预措施,但所收录的文章缺乏严谨性,也没有对基于自然的儿科职业疗法进行明确的概念界定:结论:尽管从业人员对这一主题很感兴趣,但文献中仍存在两个主要空白:对职业疗法中基于自然的实践缺乏清晰的概念,以及对职业疗法在基于自然的实践中的独特贡献缺乏阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
Differences in Parents' Beliefs and Practices with Infant Containers Relative to the Beliefs of Pediatric Therapists. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Occupational Therapy Service Access in the Initial Five Years Following Autism Diagnosis. Prevalence and Association of Generalized Joint Hypermobility in Children with Functional Neurological Disorder: A Retrospective Study. Inpatient Rehabilitation After Multi-Level Orthopedic Surgery in Youth with Cerebral Palsy: Discharge and 18-Month Mobility Outcomes. An Intervention Model for Children with Mild Developmental Delay Using Multi-Stakeholder Co-Design Study and Australia-Wide Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1