Kyra L van Rijn, Jaap Stoker, Alex Menys, Catharina S de Jonge
{"title":"Impact of bowel dilation on small bowel motility measurements with cine-MRI: assessment of two quantification techniques.","authors":"Kyra L van Rijn, Jaap Stoker, Alex Menys, Catharina S de Jonge","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20210049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of bowel dilation on cine-MRI small bowel motility measurements, by comparing a conventional motility score (including bowel wall and lumen) with a bowel wall-specific motility score in healthy and diseased populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four populations were included: 10 Crohn's patients with a stricture and prestricture dilation for segmental motility analysis, and 14 mannitol-prepared healthy subjects, 15 fasted healthy subjects and eight chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) patients (characterized by dilated bowel loops) for global small bowel motility analysis. All subjects underwent a cine-MRI scan from which two motility scores were calculated: a conventional score (including bowel wall and lumen) and a bowel wall-specific score. The difference between the two scores was calculated per population and compared between groups with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Crohn's patients, the median (IQR) change between the conventional and wall-specific motility score was 0% (-2 to +4%) within the stricture and 0% (-1 to +7%) in the prestricture dilation. For the global small bowel, this was -1% (-5 to 0%) in mannitol-prepared healthy subjects, -2% (-6 to +2%) in fasted healthy subjects and +14% (+6 to+20%) in CIPO patients. The difference between the two motility scores in CIPO patients differed significantly from the four other groups (<i>p</i> = 0.002 to <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conventional small bowel motility score seems robust in Crohn's disease patients and healthy subjects. In patients with globally and grossly dilated bowel loops, a bowel-wall specific motility score may give a better representation of small bowel motility.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>These findings support researchers and clinicians with making informed choices for using cine-MRI motility analysis in different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"4 1","pages":"20210049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459865/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of bowel dilation on cine-MRI small bowel motility measurements, by comparing a conventional motility score (including bowel wall and lumen) with a bowel wall-specific motility score in healthy and diseased populations.
Methods: Four populations were included: 10 Crohn's patients with a stricture and prestricture dilation for segmental motility analysis, and 14 mannitol-prepared healthy subjects, 15 fasted healthy subjects and eight chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) patients (characterized by dilated bowel loops) for global small bowel motility analysis. All subjects underwent a cine-MRI scan from which two motility scores were calculated: a conventional score (including bowel wall and lumen) and a bowel wall-specific score. The difference between the two scores was calculated per population and compared between groups with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer analysis.
Results: In Crohn's patients, the median (IQR) change between the conventional and wall-specific motility score was 0% (-2 to +4%) within the stricture and 0% (-1 to +7%) in the prestricture dilation. For the global small bowel, this was -1% (-5 to 0%) in mannitol-prepared healthy subjects, -2% (-6 to +2%) in fasted healthy subjects and +14% (+6 to+20%) in CIPO patients. The difference between the two motility scores in CIPO patients differed significantly from the four other groups (p = 0.002 to p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The conventional small bowel motility score seems robust in Crohn's disease patients and healthy subjects. In patients with globally and grossly dilated bowel loops, a bowel-wall specific motility score may give a better representation of small bowel motility.
Advances in knowledge: These findings support researchers and clinicians with making informed choices for using cine-MRI motility analysis in different populations.