Evaluation of the Quality of Undergraduate Full Veneer Crown Preparations at a UK Dental Teaching Hospital.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2396Singh09
H Singh, N Z Bashir, S S Virdee
{"title":"Evaluation of the Quality of Undergraduate Full Veneer Crown Preparations at a UK Dental Teaching Hospital.","authors":"H Singh,&nbsp;N Z Bashir,&nbsp;S S Virdee","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2396Singh09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the quality of full veneer crown preparations produced by supervised undergraduate students at a UK dental teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and eighty-five scanned digital dies between October 2019 and March 2021 were obtained. Using cross-sections in four planes, the total angle of convergence, abutment height, margin design and margin depth were evaluated. Statistical comparisons were made by plane, location, material-type, tooth-type, and inter- and intra-arch positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all preparations the mean total angle of convergence was 24.8° ± 11.7°. and mean abutment height was 3.6 mm ± 1.0 mm. Mandibular and molar teeth were significantly more tapered (P ⟨0.001) and exhibited significantly shorter abutment heights (P ⟨0.001). Chamfer margins were the most frequently observed and mean margin depths ranged from 0.49-1.06 mm. The compliance to recommended taught parameters were 28.1%, 42.7%, 34.1% and 6.5% for total angle of convergence, abutment height, margin design and margin depth, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study suggest that compliance to taught parameters is poor, especially for molar teeth, and demonstrates the use of digital software in guiding future research and teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2396Singh09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the quality of full veneer crown preparations produced by supervised undergraduate students at a UK dental teaching hospital.

Methods: One hundred and eighty-five scanned digital dies between October 2019 and March 2021 were obtained. Using cross-sections in four planes, the total angle of convergence, abutment height, margin design and margin depth were evaluated. Statistical comparisons were made by plane, location, material-type, tooth-type, and inter- and intra-arch positions.

Results: Across all preparations the mean total angle of convergence was 24.8° ± 11.7°. and mean abutment height was 3.6 mm ± 1.0 mm. Mandibular and molar teeth were significantly more tapered (P ⟨0.001) and exhibited significantly shorter abutment heights (P ⟨0.001). Chamfer margins were the most frequently observed and mean margin depths ranged from 0.49-1.06 mm. The compliance to recommended taught parameters were 28.1%, 42.7%, 34.1% and 6.5% for total angle of convergence, abutment height, margin design and margin depth, respectively.

Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that compliance to taught parameters is poor, especially for molar teeth, and demonstrates the use of digital software in guiding future research and teaching.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国牙科教学医院本科生全冠预备质量评价
目的:确定由英国牙科教学医院指导的本科生制作的全冠贴面制剂的质量。方法:获取2019年10月至2021年3月期间扫描的数字死亡病例185例。利用四个平面的截面,对总会聚角、桥台高度、边缘设计和边缘深度进行了评价。平面、位置、材料类型、牙型、弓间和弓内位置进行统计学比较。结果:所有制剂的平均总会聚角为24.8°±11.7°。平均基台高度为3.6 mm±1.0 mm。下颌和磨牙明显变细(P⟨0.001),基牙高度明显变短(P⟨0.001)。切角边缘是最常见的,平均边缘深度为0.49-1.06 mm。总收敛角、基台高度、边缘设计和边缘深度对推荐参数的符合率分别为28.1%、42.7%、34.1%和6.5%。结论:本研究结果表明,对教学参数的依从性较差,特别是磨牙,说明了数字化软件在指导未来研究和教学中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Repeated Firings on Color Stability of Zirconia- Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. Success and Survival of Composite Resin Restorations for the Management of Localized Anterior Tooth Wear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures. Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Resin Composite Posterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Permanent Solution? Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1