The Use of Cytotoxic Drugs as First Line Chemotherapy for EGFR (+) Nonsquamous NSCLC: A Network Meta-Analysis.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Disease Markers Pub Date : 2023-04-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/5272125
Duo Li, Meng Li, Hong Li, Puyu Shi, Mingwei Chen, Tian Yang
{"title":"The Use of Cytotoxic Drugs as First Line Chemotherapy for EGFR (+) Nonsquamous NSCLC: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Duo Li, Meng Li, Hong Li, Puyu Shi, Mingwei Chen, Tian Yang","doi":"10.1155/2023/5272125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To assess the use of cytotoxic drugs as first-line chemotherapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Method This study uses the network meta-analysis (NMA) method, with the inclusion of prospective randomized control studies related to the treatment of EGFR-positive nonsquamous NSCLC, to compare the efficacy of various EGFR-TKIs. As of September 4, 2022, 16 studies on a total of 4180 patients were included. The retrieved literature was comprehensively evaluated as per the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, and valid data were extracted and included for analysis. Results The 6 treatment regimens included cetuximab, CTX (cyclophosphamide), icotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and erlotinib. All of the 16 studies reported their findings about overall survival (OS), and 15 of them also reported findings about progression-free survival (PFS). The NMA results showed that there was no significant difference in OS among the 6 treatment regimens. It was observed that erlotinib had the highest likelihood of obtaining the best OS, followed by afatinib, gefitinib, icotinib, CTX, and cetuximab, in descending order. This indicates that the highest possibility of achieving the best OS was with erlotinib, while the lowest was with cetuximab. The NMA results also showed that the PFS achieved with treatment using afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib were all higher than that with treatment using CTX, with statistically significant differences. The results showed that there was no significant difference in PFS among erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, cetuximab, and icotinib. CTX, cetuximab, icotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and erlotinib were ranked in descending order based on the PFS indicator SUCRA values, which implied that erlotinib had the highest possibility in achieving the best PFS, while CTX had the lowest. Discussion. EGFR-TKIs must be carefully selected for the treatment of different histologic subtypes of NSCLC. For EGFR mutation (+) nonsquamous NSCLC, erlotinib is most likely to achieve the best OS and PFS, which makes it the first choice in the formulation of a treatment plan.","PeriodicalId":11201,"journal":{"name":"Disease Markers","volume":"2023 ","pages":"5272125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10110379/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disease Markers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5272125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To assess the use of cytotoxic drugs as first-line chemotherapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. Method This study uses the network meta-analysis (NMA) method, with the inclusion of prospective randomized control studies related to the treatment of EGFR-positive nonsquamous NSCLC, to compare the efficacy of various EGFR-TKIs. As of September 4, 2022, 16 studies on a total of 4180 patients were included. The retrieved literature was comprehensively evaluated as per the established inclusion and exclusion criteria, and valid data were extracted and included for analysis. Results The 6 treatment regimens included cetuximab, CTX (cyclophosphamide), icotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and erlotinib. All of the 16 studies reported their findings about overall survival (OS), and 15 of them also reported findings about progression-free survival (PFS). The NMA results showed that there was no significant difference in OS among the 6 treatment regimens. It was observed that erlotinib had the highest likelihood of obtaining the best OS, followed by afatinib, gefitinib, icotinib, CTX, and cetuximab, in descending order. This indicates that the highest possibility of achieving the best OS was with erlotinib, while the lowest was with cetuximab. The NMA results also showed that the PFS achieved with treatment using afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib were all higher than that with treatment using CTX, with statistically significant differences. The results showed that there was no significant difference in PFS among erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, cetuximab, and icotinib. CTX, cetuximab, icotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and erlotinib were ranked in descending order based on the PFS indicator SUCRA values, which implied that erlotinib had the highest possibility in achieving the best PFS, while CTX had the lowest. Discussion. EGFR-TKIs must be carefully selected for the treatment of different histologic subtypes of NSCLC. For EGFR mutation (+) nonsquamous NSCLC, erlotinib is most likely to achieve the best OS and PFS, which makes it the first choice in the formulation of a treatment plan.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将细胞毒性药物作为表皮生长因子受体(+)非鳞状 NSCLC 的一线化疗:网络 Meta 分析。
目的评估细胞毒性药物作为表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线化疗的应用情况:本研究采用网络荟萃分析(NMA)方法,纳入与治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌相关的前瞻性随机对照研究,比较各种EGFR-TKIs的疗效。截至2022年9月4日,共纳入了16项研究,涉及4180名患者。按照既定的纳入和排除标准对检索到的文献进行了全面评估,提取有效数据并纳入分析:6种治疗方案包括西妥昔单抗、CTX(环磷酰胺)、伊可替尼、吉非替尼、阿法替尼和厄洛替尼。所有 16 项研究都报告了总生存期(OS)的结果,其中 15 项研究还报告了无进展生存期(PFS)的结果。NMA结果显示,6种治疗方案的OS无显著差异。据观察,厄洛替尼获得最佳OS的可能性最大,其次依次是阿法替尼、吉非替尼、伊可替尼、CTX和西妥昔单抗。这表明,厄洛替尼获得最佳OS的可能性最高,而西妥昔单抗最低。NMA结果还显示,使用阿法替尼、厄洛替尼和吉非替尼治疗的PFS均高于使用CTX治疗的PFS,差异有统计学意义。结果显示,厄洛替尼、吉非替尼、阿法替尼、西妥昔单抗和伊可替尼的 PFS 无明显差异。根据PFS指标SUCRA值,CTX、西妥昔单抗、伊戈替尼、吉非替尼、阿法替尼和厄洛替尼的PFS从高到低排序,这意味着厄洛替尼获得最佳PFS的可能性最高,而CTX最低。讨论在治疗不同组织学亚型的NSCLC时,必须谨慎选择EGFR-TKIs。对于表皮生长因子受体突变(+)的非鳞状NSCLC,厄洛替尼最有可能获得最佳的OS和PFS,这使其成为制定治疗方案的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disease Markers
Disease Markers 医学-病理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
792
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Disease Markers is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the identification of disease markers, the elucidation of their role and mechanism, as well as their application in the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of diseases.
期刊最新文献
Impact of rs599839 Polymorphism on Coronary Artery Disease Risk in Saudi Diabetic Patients. Corrigendum to "Fluvastatin Upregulates the α 1C Subunit of CaV1.2 Channel Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells via RhoA and ERK/p38 MAPK Pathways". JAK2 as Predictor of Therapeutic Response in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib Significance of Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor Expression in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Determination of Tumor Marker Screening for Lung Cancer Using ROC Curves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1