Risk factors associated with survival in surgically treated large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.

Hakan Keskin, Hülya Dirol
{"title":"Risk factors associated with survival in surgically treated large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.","authors":"Hakan Keskin,&nbsp;Hülya Dirol","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2023.126092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are one of the rare malignant neoplasms of the lung. A standard management model for LCNEC has not yet been established and the poor prognostic factors and treatment modalities are still uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>LCNEC are fairly rare and have a poor prognosis. Determination of the risk factors associated with survival can contribute to its management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 42 patients. We obtained the data about the age, gender, smoking history, symptoms, tumor size, tumor location, pathological type, TNM stage, treatments, surgical modality, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, disease-free survival and total survival from the hospital electronic files of the patients. Then we analyzed the relationship between these data and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 (95.24%) were male, and the mean age was 64.26 ±8.62. 12 (28.57%) patients were in stage I, 14 (33.3%) were in stage II, 15 (35.71%) were in stage III and only 1 (2.38%) patient was in stage IV. 15 (35.71%) had sublobar resection (wedge resection (<i>n</i> = 13) + segmentectomy (<i>n</i> = 2), 24 (57.14%) had lobectomy and 3 (7.14%) had pneumonectomy. The mean overall survival (OS) time was 34.86 ±30.11 months. 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the patients were 73.80%, 47.61% and 19.04%, respectively. T stage (HR = 8.956, 95% CI: 1.521-11.034, <i>p</i> = 0.005) <i>N</i> stage (HR = 5.984, 95% CI: 1.127-7.982, <i>p</i> = 0.028) were independent risk factors for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall survival in LCNEC was poor and the tumor size and the nodal stage were independent risk factors for overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/03/37/KITP-20-50405.PMC10107415.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.126092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are one of the rare malignant neoplasms of the lung. A standard management model for LCNEC has not yet been established and the poor prognostic factors and treatment modalities are still uncertain.

Aim: LCNEC are fairly rare and have a poor prognosis. Determination of the risk factors associated with survival can contribute to its management.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 42 patients. We obtained the data about the age, gender, smoking history, symptoms, tumor size, tumor location, pathological type, TNM stage, treatments, surgical modality, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, disease-free survival and total survival from the hospital electronic files of the patients. Then we analyzed the relationship between these data and survival.

Results: 40 (95.24%) were male, and the mean age was 64.26 ±8.62. 12 (28.57%) patients were in stage I, 14 (33.3%) were in stage II, 15 (35.71%) were in stage III and only 1 (2.38%) patient was in stage IV. 15 (35.71%) had sublobar resection (wedge resection (n = 13) + segmentectomy (n = 2), 24 (57.14%) had lobectomy and 3 (7.14%) had pneumonectomy. The mean overall survival (OS) time was 34.86 ±30.11 months. 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the patients were 73.80%, 47.61% and 19.04%, respectively. T stage (HR = 8.956, 95% CI: 1.521-11.034, p = 0.005) N stage (HR = 5.984, 95% CI: 1.127-7.982, p = 0.028) were independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusions: The overall survival in LCNEC was poor and the tumor size and the nodal stage were independent risk factors for overall survival.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术治疗的肺大细胞神经内分泌癌与生存相关的危险因素。
肺大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)是一种罕见的肺部恶性肿瘤。LCNEC的标准管理模式尚未建立,不良预后因素和治疗方式仍不确定。目的:LCNEC相当罕见,预后较差。确定与生存相关的危险因素有助于其管理。材料和方法:在本回顾性研究中,我们分析了42例患者的资料。我们从医院电子档案中获取患者的年龄、性别、吸烟史、症状、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、病理类型、TNM分期、治疗方法、手术方式、住院时间、术后并发症、无病生存期、总生存期等资料。然后我们分析了这些数据与生存率之间的关系。结果:男性40例(95.24%),平均年龄64.26±8.62岁。I期12例(28.57%),II期14例(33.3%),III期15例(35.71%),IV期仅1例(2.38%)。行叶下切除术(楔形切除术(n = 13) +节段切除术(n = 2) 15例(35.71%),肺叶切除术24例(57.14%),全肺切除术3例(7.14%)。平均总生存期(OS)为34.86±30.11个月。患者1年、3年、5年生存率分别为73.80%、47.61%、19.04%。T分期(HR = 8.956, 95% CI: 1.521 ~ 11.034, p = 0.005)和N分期(HR = 5.984, 95% CI: 1.127 ~ 7.982, p = 0.028)是OS的独立危险因素。结论:LCNEC患者总生存率较差,肿瘤大小和淋巴结分期是影响总生存率的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
期刊最新文献
Clinicodemographic profile and outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with sac: experience of a paediatric referral centre. Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study. Enhancing treatment approaches for postpneumonectomy empyema: exploring the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery. Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late. Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the Perfecta study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1