Adopting a metaverse-based workspace to support research team collaboration: a pilot study from an academic health informatics laboratory.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad010
Siyi Zhu, Scott Vennemeyer, Catherine Xu, Danny T Y Wu
{"title":"Adopting a metaverse-based workspace to support research team collaboration: a pilot study from an academic health informatics laboratory.","authors":"Siyi Zhu,&nbsp;Scott Vennemeyer,&nbsp;Catherine Xu,&nbsp;Danny T Y Wu","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand how a metaverse-based (virtual) workspace can be used to support the communication and collaboration in an academic health informatics lab.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey of lab members (n = 14) was analyzed according to a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design. The qualitative survey data were organized according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model and combined to generate personas that represent the overall types of lab members. Additionally, scheduled work hours were analyzed quantitatively to complement the findings of the survey feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four personas, representative of different types of virtual workers, were developed using the survey responses. These personas reflected the wide variety of opinions about virtual work among the participants and helped to categorize the most common feedback. The Work Hours Schedule Sheet analysis showed the low number of possible collaboration opportunities that were utilized compared to the number available.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that informal communication and co-location were not supported by the virtual workplace as we had originally planned. To solve this issue, we offer 3 design recommendations for those looking to implement their own virtual informatics lab. First, labs should establish common goals and norms for virtual workplace interactions. Second, labs should carefully plan the virtual space layout to maximize communication opportunities. Finally, labs should work with their platform of choice to address technical limitations for their lab members to improve user experience. Future work includes a formal, theory-guided experiment with consideration on ethical and behavioral impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"ooad010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7c/58/ooad010.PMC9969827.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to understand how a metaverse-based (virtual) workspace can be used to support the communication and collaboration in an academic health informatics lab.

Materials and methods: A survey of lab members (n = 14) was analyzed according to a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design. The qualitative survey data were organized according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model and combined to generate personas that represent the overall types of lab members. Additionally, scheduled work hours were analyzed quantitatively to complement the findings of the survey feedback.

Results: Four personas, representative of different types of virtual workers, were developed using the survey responses. These personas reflected the wide variety of opinions about virtual work among the participants and helped to categorize the most common feedback. The Work Hours Schedule Sheet analysis showed the low number of possible collaboration opportunities that were utilized compared to the number available.

Discussion: We found that informal communication and co-location were not supported by the virtual workplace as we had originally planned. To solve this issue, we offer 3 design recommendations for those looking to implement their own virtual informatics lab. First, labs should establish common goals and norms for virtual workplace interactions. Second, labs should carefully plan the virtual space layout to maximize communication opportunities. Finally, labs should work with their platform of choice to address technical limitations for their lab members to improve user experience. Future work includes a formal, theory-guided experiment with consideration on ethical and behavioral impact.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用基于元数据的工作空间来支持研究团队协作:来自学术卫生信息学实验室的一项试点研究。
目的:本研究旨在了解如何使用基于元空间(虚拟)的工作空间来支持学术卫生信息学实验室的沟通与协作。材料与方法:采用并行三角法混合方法设计,对14名实验室成员进行调查分析。根据能力,机会,动机,行为(COM-B)模型组织定性调查数据,并结合生成代表实验室成员整体类型的人物角色。此外,计划工作时间进行了定量分析,以补充调查反馈的结果。结果:四个角色,代表不同类型的虚拟工作者,被开发使用的调查回应。这些角色反映了参与者对虚拟工作的各种各样的意见,并有助于对最常见的反馈进行分类。Work Hours Schedule Sheet分析显示,与可用的数量相比,被利用的可能的协作机会数量较少。讨论:我们发现虚拟工作场所不支持非正式的沟通和共同办公,正如我们最初计划的那样。为了解决这个问题,我们为那些希望实现自己的虚拟信息学实验室的人提供了3个设计建议。首先,实验室应该为虚拟工作场所的互动建立共同的目标和规范。第二,实验室要认真规划虚拟空间布局,最大化交流机会。最后,实验室应该使用他们选择的平台来解决实验室成员的技术限制,以改善用户体验。未来的工作包括一个正式的,理论指导的实验,考虑伦理和行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Business intelligence systems for population health management: a scoping review. Implementation of a rule-based algorithm to find patients eligible for cancer clinical trials. Implications of mappings between International Classification of Diseases clinical diagnosis codes and Human Phenotype Ontology terms. MMFP-Tableau: enabling precision mitochondrial medicine through integration, visualization, and analytics of clinical and research health system electronic data. Addressing ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence using a lifecycle-informed process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1