Association of Frailty and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes in Older U.S. Veterans.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1177/10499091231171389
Dominique M Tosi, Marlena C Fernandez, Shivaan Oomrigar, Lorena P Burton, Iriana S Hammel, Andrew Quartin, Jorge G Ruiz
{"title":"Association of Frailty and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes in Older U.S. Veterans.","authors":"Dominique M Tosi, Marlena C Fernandez, Shivaan Oomrigar, Lorena P Burton, Iriana S Hammel, Andrew Quartin, Jorge G Ruiz","doi":"10.1177/10499091231171389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Determine the association between frailty and immediate survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in older Veterans. Secondary outcomes: compare in-hospital mortality, duration of resuscitation efforts, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, neurologic outcomes, and discharge disposition between frail and non-frail Veterans. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort study including Veterans 50 years and older, who were \"Full Code\" and had in-hospital cardiac arrest between 7/1/2017 and 6/30/2020, at the Miami VAMC. Frailty Index for the VA (VA-FI) was used to determine frailty status. Immediate Survival was determined by return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in-hospital mortality was determined by all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between frail and non-frail Veterans using chi-square test. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and previous hospitalizations, we used multivariate binomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals to analyze the relationship between immediate survival and frailty, and in-hospital mortality and frailty. <b>Results:</b> 91% Veterans were non-Hispanic, 49% Caucasian, 96% male, mean age 70.7 ± 8.5 years, 73% frail and 27% non-frail. Seventy-six (65.5%) Veterans had ROSC, without difference by frailty status (<i>P</i> = .891). There was no difference based on frailty status of in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or neurologic outcomes. Frail and non-frail Veterans had resuscitation efforts lasting the same amount of time. <b>Conclusions and Implications:</b> CPR outcomes were not different depending on frailty status in our Veteran population. With these results, we cannot use frailty - as measured by the VA-FI - as a prognosticator of CPR outcomes in Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"398-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231171389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determine the association between frailty and immediate survival of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in older Veterans. Secondary outcomes: compare in-hospital mortality, duration of resuscitation efforts, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, neurologic outcomes, and discharge disposition between frail and non-frail Veterans. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including Veterans 50 years and older, who were "Full Code" and had in-hospital cardiac arrest between 7/1/2017 and 6/30/2020, at the Miami VAMC. Frailty Index for the VA (VA-FI) was used to determine frailty status. Immediate Survival was determined by return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and in-hospital mortality was determined by all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between frail and non-frail Veterans using chi-square test. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and previous hospitalizations, we used multivariate binomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals to analyze the relationship between immediate survival and frailty, and in-hospital mortality and frailty. Results: 91% Veterans were non-Hispanic, 49% Caucasian, 96% male, mean age 70.7 ± 8.5 years, 73% frail and 27% non-frail. Seventy-six (65.5%) Veterans had ROSC, without difference by frailty status (P = .891). There was no difference based on frailty status of in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or neurologic outcomes. Frail and non-frail Veterans had resuscitation efforts lasting the same amount of time. Conclusions and Implications: CPR outcomes were not different depending on frailty status in our Veteran population. With these results, we cannot use frailty - as measured by the VA-FI - as a prognosticator of CPR outcomes in Veterans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国老年退伍军人体弱与心肺复苏结果的关系。
目标:确定老年退伍军人的虚弱程度与心肺复苏术(CPR)即时存活率之间的关系:确定老年退伍军人的虚弱程度与心肺复苏(CPR)的即时存活率之间的关系。次要结果:比较虚弱退伍军人和非虚弱退伍军人的院内死亡率、复苏持续时间、住院和重症监护室 (ICU) 病程、神经系统结果和出院处置。方法:回顾性队列研究:回顾性队列研究包括迈阿密退伍军人医疗中心的 50 岁及以上退伍军人,他们在 2017 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间 "全代码 "并发生院内心脏骤停。退伍军人虚弱指数(VA-FI)用于确定虚弱状态。立即存活率由自发循环恢复(ROSC)决定,院内死亡率由全因死亡率决定。我们使用卡方检验比较了虚弱退伍军人和非虚弱退伍军人的结果。在对年龄、性别、种族和既往住院情况进行调整后,我们使用带 95% 置信区间的多变量二项逻辑回归分析了即时存活率与虚弱程度、院内死亡率与虚弱程度之间的关系。结果显示91%的退伍军人为非西班牙裔,49%为高加索人,96%为男性,平均年龄(70.7 ± 8.5)岁,73%为体弱者,27%为非体弱者。76名退伍军人(65.5%)获得了ROSC,不同体弱状况的退伍军人之间没有差异(P = .891)。在院内死亡率、出院处置或神经系统结果方面,虚弱状态没有差异。虚弱和非虚弱退伍军人的复苏时间相同。结论与启示:在我们的退伍军人群体中,心肺复苏的结果并不因虚弱状态而异。根据这些结果,我们不能使用退伍军人体弱指数(VA-FI)来预测退伍军人的心肺复苏结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pain Outcomes Among Medical Centers With High vs Low Specialist Palliative Care Reach Among People With Heart Failure. Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1