Survival after PCI or CABG for left main stem coronary stenosis. A single institution registry from the NOBLE study period.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1080/14017431.2023.2197184
Truls Myrmel, Anders Lamøy Bjøru, Petter Cappelen Endresen
{"title":"Survival after PCI or CABG for left main stem coronary stenosis. A single institution registry from the NOBLE study period.","authors":"Truls Myrmel,&nbsp;Anders Lamøy Bjøru,&nbsp;Petter Cappelen Endresen","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2023.2197184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i> To analyze 10 years mortality in an all-comers registry of patients with left main coronary artery stenoses treated with either PCI or CABG. <i>Design.</i> Patients with left main coronary stenoses treated with either PCI or CABG in the period of the NOBLE trial (2010-2015) were all included in an institutional database and registry (University Hospital North Norway). Fifty-six of totally 429 patients were included in the randomized, multicenter and international NOBLE trail; 426 eligible patients from the trial and registry were analyzed for mortality on 20 October 2020. The longest observation time on this date was 3611 days (9.9 years); 205 patients were treated with PCI and 221 with CABG. The patients treated with PCI were 74 ± 10 years vs 68 ± 10 years (CABG). Also, on average the PCI patients had more comorbidities (lower ejection fraction, more peripheral artery disease, more often acute presentation). <i>Results</i>. Survival at the last observation date was 80% for CABG patients vs 48% for PCI. A Cox proportional hazards analysis found PCI to be the strongest independent predictor for mortality (HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.7). Also, COPD, chronic kidney disease, age, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular incidents and acute presentation were factor predicting increased 10 years mortality. <i>Conclusion</i>. These data indicate that life expectancy in the overall patient population is shorter for patient treated for left main disease with PCI than with CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2023.2197184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To analyze 10 years mortality in an all-comers registry of patients with left main coronary artery stenoses treated with either PCI or CABG. Design. Patients with left main coronary stenoses treated with either PCI or CABG in the period of the NOBLE trial (2010-2015) were all included in an institutional database and registry (University Hospital North Norway). Fifty-six of totally 429 patients were included in the randomized, multicenter and international NOBLE trail; 426 eligible patients from the trial and registry were analyzed for mortality on 20 October 2020. The longest observation time on this date was 3611 days (9.9 years); 205 patients were treated with PCI and 221 with CABG. The patients treated with PCI were 74 ± 10 years vs 68 ± 10 years (CABG). Also, on average the PCI patients had more comorbidities (lower ejection fraction, more peripheral artery disease, more often acute presentation). Results. Survival at the last observation date was 80% for CABG patients vs 48% for PCI. A Cox proportional hazards analysis found PCI to be the strongest independent predictor for mortality (HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.7). Also, COPD, chronic kidney disease, age, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular incidents and acute presentation were factor predicting increased 10 years mortality. Conclusion. These data indicate that life expectancy in the overall patient population is shorter for patient treated for left main disease with PCI than with CABG.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左主干冠状动脉狭窄PCI或CABG后的生存率。NOBLE研究期间的单一机构注册表。
客观的分析10 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗的左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者的年死亡率。设计NOBLE试验期间(2010-2015年)接受PCI或CABG治疗的左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者均被纳入机构数据库和登记(挪威北部大学医院)。429名患者中有56名被纳入随机、多中心和国际NOBLE试验;2020年10月20日,对试验和登记的426名符合条件的患者进行了死亡率分析。这一天最长的观测时间是3611 天(9.9 年);205例患者接受PCI治疗,221例患者接受CABG治疗。接受PCI治疗的患者有74人 ± 10 68岁 ± 10 年(CABG)。此外,平均而言,PCI患者有更多的合并症(射血分数较低,更多的外周动脉疾病,更常见的急性表现)。后果CABG患者在最后一次观察日期的存活率为80%,PCI患者为48%。Cox比例风险分析发现PCI是死亡率的最强独立预测因子(HR=2.5,95%CI 1.7-3.7)。此外,COPD、慢性肾脏疾病、年龄、外周血管疾病、脑血管事件和急性发作是预测死亡率的因素 年死亡率。结论这些数据表明,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干疾病的患者总体预期寿命比冠状动脉旁路移植术更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
期刊最新文献
The effect of early follow-up after open cardiac surgery in a student clinic. Is a hyperosmolar pump prime for cardiopulmonary bypass a risk factor for postoperative delirium? A double blinded randomised controlled trial. First description of Portuguese patients with cardiac amyloidosis and p.Val142Ile: more evidence of an "African variant" in Caucasians. Survival after PCI or CABG for left main stem coronary stenosis. A single institution registry from the NOBLE study period. First Norwegian case of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with a novel transthyretin variant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1