Perspectives of People With Cancer or Hereditary Cancer Risk on the Use and Value of Online Peer Support.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1968
Jill Holdren, Karl Surkan, Andrea Downing
{"title":"Perspectives of People With Cancer or Hereditary Cancer Risk on the Use and Value of Online Peer Support.","authors":"Jill Holdren,&nbsp;Karl Surkan,&nbsp;Andrea Downing","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People with cancer routinely seek information and support in peer groups online. While peer communities constitute a major component of the health care landscape, they exist in isolation from clinical and research institutions. This study aimed to explore how and why cancer patients utilize online peer support groups and how they might be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of members of 6 closed Facebook cancer peer support groups (n=291) participated in an online needs assessment survey. We further conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 members and 6 moderator-patients, hand-coding the free-text responses and interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group participation was largely motivated by the desire to exchange information (79%) and to connect with others sharing the same condition (76%). Among study participants, 40% indicated they did not get information or support from any other online or offline organizations, 60% indicated they had few concerns with Facebook peer support groups, 84% indicated it was at least somewhat important that their health information and posts remain private, and 75% desired more input from experts in order to access evidence-based information and curb misinformation. About half wanted more group moderation, and moderators themselves expressed an urgent need for training and support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While online peer groups are a commonly utilized care component for many people with cancer or hereditary cancer risk and serve as a primary source of condition information, many participants desired more expert involvement in and moderation of groups. Privacy and security of health information was another key need expressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"10 2","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117532/pdf/jpcrr-10.2.58.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: People with cancer routinely seek information and support in peer groups online. While peer communities constitute a major component of the health care landscape, they exist in isolation from clinical and research institutions. This study aimed to explore how and why cancer patients utilize online peer support groups and how they might be improved.

Methods: A convenience sample of members of 6 closed Facebook cancer peer support groups (n=291) participated in an online needs assessment survey. We further conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 members and 6 moderator-patients, hand-coding the free-text responses and interview transcripts.

Results: Group participation was largely motivated by the desire to exchange information (79%) and to connect with others sharing the same condition (76%). Among study participants, 40% indicated they did not get information or support from any other online or offline organizations, 60% indicated they had few concerns with Facebook peer support groups, 84% indicated it was at least somewhat important that their health information and posts remain private, and 75% desired more input from experts in order to access evidence-based information and curb misinformation. About half wanted more group moderation, and moderators themselves expressed an urgent need for training and support.

Conclusions: While online peer groups are a commonly utilized care component for many people with cancer or hereditary cancer risk and serve as a primary source of condition information, many participants desired more expert involvement in and moderation of groups. Privacy and security of health information was another key need expressed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症或遗传癌症风险人群对在线同伴支持的使用和价值的看法。
目的:癌症患者通常会在网上的同伴群体中寻求信息和支持。虽然同侪社区是保健领域的一个重要组成部分,但它们与临床和研究机构是隔离存在的。这项研究旨在探索癌症患者如何以及为什么利用在线同伴支持小组,以及如何改进他们。方法:选取6个封闭的Facebook癌症同伴支持小组的方便样本(n=291)参与在线需求评估调查。我们进一步对14名成员和6名主持患者进行了半结构化访谈,并对自由文本回答和访谈记录进行了手工编码。结果:小组参与的主要动机是交换信息(79%)和与其他有相同条件的人联系(76%)。在研究参与者中,40%的人表示他们没有从任何其他在线或离线组织获得信息或支持,60%的人表示他们很少担心Facebook的同伴支持小组,84%的人表示他们的健康信息和帖子保持隐私至少有点重要,75%的人希望从专家那里获得更多的信息,以便获得基于证据的信息并遏制错误信息。大约一半的人想要更多的小组审核,审核人自己也表示迫切需要培训和支持。结论:虽然在线同伴小组是许多有癌症或遗传性癌症风险的人通常使用的护理组成部分,并作为病情信息的主要来源,但许多参与者希望更多的专家参与和适度的小组。健康信息的隐私和安全是另一项重要需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It Is What It Is" - The Lived Experience of Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. "Ups and Downs, Joys and Sorrows" - Assessment and Clinical Relevance of Patient Priorities in an Interdisciplinary Parkinson's Disease Clinic. Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education. Determining the Prognostic Value of Complete Blood Count Subgroup Parameters in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Factors Influencing Self-Wound Care Adoption in Singaporean Communities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1