Impact of prior statin use on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in acute coronary syndrome

Marcelo José de Carvalho Cantarelli , Silvio Gioppato , Hélio José Castello Jr. , Rosaly Gonçalves , Evandro Karlo Pracchia Ribeiro , João Batista de Freitas Guimarães , Ednelson Cunha Navarro , Danilo Maksud , Julio Cesar Francisco Vardi
{"title":"Impact of prior statin use on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in acute coronary syndrome","authors":"Marcelo José de Carvalho Cantarelli ,&nbsp;Silvio Gioppato ,&nbsp;Hélio José Castello Jr. ,&nbsp;Rosaly Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Evandro Karlo Pracchia Ribeiro ,&nbsp;João Batista de Freitas Guimarães ,&nbsp;Ednelson Cunha Navarro ,&nbsp;Danilo Maksud ,&nbsp;Julio Cesar Francisco Vardi","doi":"10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of statins prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced cardiac events in both short and long-term follow-up. This study assessed the impact of prior statin use on in-hospital PCI outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of 6,288 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Of these, 35% had ACS and were evaluated according to statin use (Group 1, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1,203) or no use (Group 2, n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->999).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Group 1 showed higher prevalence of dyslipidemia, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), previous coronary artery bypass graft, chronic renal failure, multivessel involvement, bifurcation lesions, and use of drug-eluting stents. Group 2 showed more primary and rescue PCIs, Killip functional class III/IV, B2/C lesions, thrombi, total occlusions, pre-procedural TIMI 0/1 flow, presence of collateral circulation, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and aspiration catheters. PCI success was higher in Group 1 (95.1% vs. 92.5%; <em>p</em> <em>=</em> <!-->0.01), and the occurrence of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) (3.7% vs. 5.7%) was more frequent in Group 2. Although the non-use of statins showed an association with MACCE in the univariate analysis, independent predictors of in-hospital MACCE were limited to AMI in Killip III/IV and prior coronary artery bypass graft.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ACS patients undergoing PCI who previously used statins had better in-hospital clinical outcomes; however, statin use was not an independent predictor of MACCE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101094,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 108-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbciev.2015.12.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214123515000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of statins prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced cardiac events in both short and long-term follow-up. This study assessed the impact of prior statin use on in-hospital PCI outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of 6,288 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Of these, 35% had ACS and were evaluated according to statin use (Group 1, n = 1,203) or no use (Group 2, n = 999).

Results

Group 1 showed higher prevalence of dyslipidemia, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), previous coronary artery bypass graft, chronic renal failure, multivessel involvement, bifurcation lesions, and use of drug-eluting stents. Group 2 showed more primary and rescue PCIs, Killip functional class III/IV, B2/C lesions, thrombi, total occlusions, pre-procedural TIMI 0/1 flow, presence of collateral circulation, and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and aspiration catheters. PCI success was higher in Group 1 (95.1% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.01), and the occurrence of major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events (MACCE) (3.7% vs. 5.7%) was more frequent in Group 2. Although the non-use of statins showed an association with MACCE in the univariate analysis, independent predictors of in-hospital MACCE were limited to AMI in Killip III/IV and prior coronary artery bypass graft.

Conclusions

ACS patients undergoing PCI who previously used statins had better in-hospital clinical outcomes; however, statin use was not an independent predictor of MACCE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往使用他汀类药物对急性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响
在短期和长期随访中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前使用他汀类药物可减少心脏事件。本研究评估了他汀类药物对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者住院PCI治疗结果的影响。方法对6288例连续行PCI治疗的多中心登记患者进行回顾性分析。其中,35%患有ACS,并根据他汀类药物使用(组1,n = 1203)或未使用(组2,n = 999)进行评估。结果1组患者血脂异常、急性心肌梗死(AMI)、既往冠状动脉搭桥术、慢性肾功能衰竭、多支血管受累、分叉病变和药物洗脱支架使用的发生率较高。第2组出现更多的原发性和救救性pci, Killip功能III/IV级,B2/C级病变,血栓,全闭塞,术前TIMI 0/1血流,侧支循环存在,使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂和抽吸导管。第一组PCI成功率更高(95.1% vs. 92.5%;p = 0.01),且2组的主要脑血管和心脏不良事件(MACCE)发生率(3.7% vs. 5.7%)更高。虽然在单变量分析中,未使用他汀类药物与MACCE相关,但院内MACCE的独立预测因子仅限于Killip III/IV期AMI和既往冠状动脉旁路移植。结论行PCI术的sacs患者既往使用他汀类药物的住院临床效果较好;然而,他汀类药物的使用并不是MACCE的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in smokers Right heart catheterization through ultrasound-guided antecubital vein approach Transition between ticagrelor and two different doses of clopidogrel at hospital discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention Rare form of coronary fistula draining into the right ventricular apex Evaluation of scattered radiation and impact of local protective devices in an interventional cardiology laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1