Institution-Wide Analysis of Academic Outcomes Associated with Participation in UGR: Comparison of Different Research Modalities at a Hispanic-Serving Institution.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18833/spur/5/3/9
Samantha Jude Battaglia, Lourdes E Echegoyen, Laura A Diaz-Martinez
{"title":"Institution-Wide Analysis of Academic Outcomes Associated with Participation in UGR: Comparison of Different Research Modalities at a Hispanic-Serving Institution.","authors":"Samantha Jude Battaglia,&nbsp;Lourdes E Echegoyen,&nbsp;Laura A Diaz-Martinez","doi":"10.18833/spur/5/3/9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most studies on the benefits of participation in undergraduate research (UGR) use data from student participants in undergraduate research programs (URPs), which offer a limited number of positions. In reality, however, the majority of UGR students participate in undergraduate research not in programs (URNPs). The authors conducted an institution-wide study at a Hispanic-serving institution to examine the relationship between academic success and participation in these two UGR modalities. Although there were some differences between URPs and URNPs, participation in research at this institution was largely equitable and inclusive, with UGR demographics that reflected those of the institution, and it was positively associated with increased benefits along multiple academic metrics, regardless of UGR modality. Importantly, these increases were observed for both first time in college and transfer students.</p>","PeriodicalId":29737,"journal":{"name":"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121209/pdf/nihms-1887909.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPUR-Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/5/3/9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Most studies on the benefits of participation in undergraduate research (UGR) use data from student participants in undergraduate research programs (URPs), which offer a limited number of positions. In reality, however, the majority of UGR students participate in undergraduate research not in programs (URNPs). The authors conducted an institution-wide study at a Hispanic-serving institution to examine the relationship between academic success and participation in these two UGR modalities. Although there were some differences between URPs and URNPs, participation in research at this institution was largely equitable and inclusive, with UGR demographics that reflected those of the institution, and it was positively associated with increased benefits along multiple academic metrics, regardless of UGR modality. Importantly, these increases were observed for both first time in college and transfer students.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与UGR相关学术成果的全学院分析:一所西班牙裔服务机构不同研究模式的比较。
大多数关于参与本科研究(UGR)的好处的研究使用的数据来自本科生研究项目(urp)的学生参与者,这些项目提供的职位数量有限。然而,在现实中,大多数UGR学生参加的是本科研究,而不是项目(URNPs)。作者在一个为西班牙裔服务的机构进行了一项全机构的研究,以检查学业成功与参与这两种UGR模式之间的关系。尽管urp和urnp之间存在一些差异,但该机构的研究参与在很大程度上是公平和包容的,UGR的人口统计数据反映了该机构的人口统计数据,并且无论UGR的模式如何,它都与多个学术指标的收益增加呈正相关。重要的是,这些增长首次在大学和转学生中被观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Genomics Education Partnership: First findings on genomics research in community colleges. SUREbyts: Presenting Early-Year Undergraduate Students with Videos on Research Topics Laboratory-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (LUREs): Evidence of Effectiveness from the Social Sciences Step Up for SPUR Building Research Skills through an Undergraduate Research Project on Local Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1