"I Am Afraid of Positioning my Baby in Prone": Beliefs and Knowledge about Tummy Time Practice.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS International Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/4153523
Bianca Fernandes Vasconcelos E Silva, Sabrinne Suelen Santos Sampaio, Julia Raffin Moura, Cléa Emanuela Barreto de Medeiros, Carolina Daniel de Lima-Alvarez, Camila Rocha Simão, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Silvana Alves Pereira
{"title":"\"I Am Afraid of Positioning my Baby in Prone\": Beliefs and Knowledge about Tummy Time Practice.","authors":"Bianca Fernandes Vasconcelos E Silva,&nbsp;Sabrinne Suelen Santos Sampaio,&nbsp;Julia Raffin Moura,&nbsp;Cléa Emanuela Barreto de Medeiros,&nbsp;Carolina Daniel de Lima-Alvarez,&nbsp;Camila Rocha Simão,&nbsp;Ingrid Guerra Azevedo,&nbsp;Silvana Alves Pereira","doi":"10.1155/2023/4153523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify beliefs and knowledge about tummy time (TT) practice and its repercussions on motor development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal study carried out with parents/caregivers of infants older than 30 days of life. Two assessments were performed. A structured interview was conducted, while the babies were between one and six months old to identify beliefs, knowledge about TT, and the motor milestone achievement expected for the age. At six to 12 months, the risk of motor development delay was tracked using the survey of well-being of young infant questionnaire (SWYC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 families responded to the SWYC questionnaire (21 were allocated to the TT group). 31.70% reported that it was not important to put the infants in a prone position while awake, and 70.70% said they are afraid their babies would become breathless when positioned in a prone position. 85.70% of infants from the TT group showed typical development, while 55% of the control group showed atypical development for their age (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Only three infants from the control group were at risk of delayed motor development (<i>p</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the families feel insecure about proning their babies and fear breathlessness when positioned. Acquisition of motor milestones prevailed in the TT group, suggesting an association between TT practice and motor milestone achievement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132908/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4153523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To identify beliefs and knowledge about tummy time (TT) practice and its repercussions on motor development.

Methods: Longitudinal study carried out with parents/caregivers of infants older than 30 days of life. Two assessments were performed. A structured interview was conducted, while the babies were between one and six months old to identify beliefs, knowledge about TT, and the motor milestone achievement expected for the age. At six to 12 months, the risk of motor development delay was tracked using the survey of well-being of young infant questionnaire (SWYC).

Results: 41 families responded to the SWYC questionnaire (21 were allocated to the TT group). 31.70% reported that it was not important to put the infants in a prone position while awake, and 70.70% said they are afraid their babies would become breathless when positioned in a prone position. 85.70% of infants from the TT group showed typical development, while 55% of the control group showed atypical development for their age (p = 0.01). Only three infants from the control group were at risk of delayed motor development (p = 0.10).

Conclusions: Most of the families feel insecure about proning their babies and fear breathlessness when positioned. Acquisition of motor milestones prevailed in the TT group, suggesting an association between TT practice and motor milestone achievement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我害怕让宝宝俯卧”:关于俯卧时间练习的信念和知识。
目的:了解俯卧时间(TT)练习及其对运动发育的影响。方法:对出生30天以上婴儿的父母/照顾者进行纵向研究。进行了两次评估。当婴儿在1到6个月大的时候,进行了一次结构化的访谈,以确定对TT的信念、知识和该年龄预期的运动里程碑成就。在6至12个月时,使用幼儿健康问卷(SWYC)追踪运动发育迟缓的风险。结果:41个家庭回复了SWYC问卷(其中21个被分配到TT组)。31.70%的受访妈妈认为,让宝宝在清醒时俯卧并不重要,70.70%的受访妈妈担心宝宝俯卧会出现呼吸困难。TT组患儿发育典型率为85.70%,对照组患儿发育不典型率为55% (p = 0.01)。对照组中只有3名婴儿存在运动发育迟缓的风险(p = 0.10)。结论:大多数家庭对婴儿俯卧感到不安全,并担心俯卧时呼吸困难。运动里程碑的获得在TT组中普遍存在,这表明TT练习与运动里程碑的实现之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Pediatrics is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original researcharticles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pediatric research. The journal accepts submissions presented as an original article, short communication, case report, review article, systematic review, or letter to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Cell-Free Fetal DNA for Prenatal Screening of Aneuploidies and Autosomal Trisomies: A Systematic Review. Early-Life Risk Factors and Clinical Features of Food Allergy Among Thai Children. Maternal Satisfaction With Children's Vaccination and Its Contributing Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Key Influences on Oral Feeding Achievement in Preterm Infants: Insights From a Tertiary Hospital in Indonesia. Frequency of Functional Constipation in Lebanese Children: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Parental Reporting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1