Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography.

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING World journal of radiology Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32
Xiao-Lu Hu, Pei-Kai Huang, Meng Zhang, Jun Chen, Meng-Qiang Xiao
{"title":"Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography.","authors":"Xiao-Lu Hu,&nbsp;Pei-Kai Huang,&nbsp;Meng Zhang,&nbsp;Jun Chen,&nbsp;Meng-Qiang Xiao","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the preferred non-invasive examination method for coronary heart disease. However, the radiation from computed tomography has become a concern since public awareness of radiation hazards continue to increase.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the value of multiple dose reduction techniques for CCTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive normal and overweight patients were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A<sub>1</sub>, patients who received multiple dose reduction scans (<i>n</i> = 82); and group A<sub>2</sub>, patients who received conventional scans (<i>n</i> = 39). The scan parameters for group A<sub>1</sub> were as follows: Isocentric scan, tube voltage = 80 kV, and tube current control using 80% smart milliampere. The scan parameters for group A<sub>2</sub> were as follows: Normal position, tube voltage = 100 kV, and smart milliampere.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average effective doses (EDs) for groups A<sub>1</sub> and A<sub>2</sub> were 1.13 ± 0.35 and 3.36 ± 1.30 mSv, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in ED between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Furthermore, noise was significantly lower, and both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast signal-to-noise ratio were higher in group A<sub>2</sub> when compared to group A<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Moreover, the subjective image quality (IQ) scores were excellent in both groups, in which there was no significant difference in subjective IQ score between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple dose reduction scan techniques can significantly decrease the ED of patients receiving CCTA examinations for clinical diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/2a/WJR-15-32.PMC9979190.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the preferred non-invasive examination method for coronary heart disease. However, the radiation from computed tomography has become a concern since public awareness of radiation hazards continue to increase.

Aim: To explore the value of multiple dose reduction techniques for CCTA.

Methods: Consecutive normal and overweight patients were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A1, patients who received multiple dose reduction scans (n = 82); and group A2, patients who received conventional scans (n = 39). The scan parameters for group A1 were as follows: Isocentric scan, tube voltage = 80 kV, and tube current control using 80% smart milliampere. The scan parameters for group A2 were as follows: Normal position, tube voltage = 100 kV, and smart milliampere.

Results: The average effective doses (EDs) for groups A1 and A2 were 1.13 ± 0.35 and 3.36 ± 1.30 mSv, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in ED between the two groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, noise was significantly lower, and both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast signal-to-noise ratio were higher in group A2 when compared to group A1 (P < 0.01). Moreover, the subjective image quality (IQ) scores were excellent in both groups, in which there was no significant difference in subjective IQ score between the two groups (P = 0.12).

Conclusion: Multiple dose reduction scan techniques can significantly decrease the ED of patients receiving CCTA examinations for clinical diagnosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重减剂量技术对冠状动脉计算机断层造影的影响。
背景:冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)是冠心病首选的无创检查方法。然而,由于公众对辐射危害的认识不断提高,计算机断层扫描的辐射已成为一个令人担忧的问题。目的:探讨多重减剂量技术在CCTA中的应用价值。方法:连续正常和超重患者前瞻性分为两组:A1组,接受多次减剂量扫描的患者(n = 82);A2组为接受常规扫描的患者(n = 39)。A1组的扫描参数为:等心扫描,管电压为80 kV,管电流控制为80%智能毫安。A2组的扫描参数为:正常位置,管电压= 100 kV,智能毫安。结果:A1组和A2组的平均有效剂量(EDs)分别为1.13±0.35和3.36±1.30 mSv。两组患者ED评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。A2组的噪声显著低于A1组,信噪比和对比信噪比均高于A1组(P < 0.01)。此外,两组的主观图像质量(IQ)得分均为优秀,其中两组的主观智商得分无显著差异(P = 0.12)。结论:多次减剂量扫描技术可显著降低临床诊断CCTA检查患者的ED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Asymmetric outcomes in bilateral maxillary impacted tooth extractions: A case report. Breast cancer imaging-clinical experience with two-dimensional-shear wave elastography: A retrospective study. Cryoablation for intrapulmonary bronchial cyst: A case report. Cystic ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas complicated with neuroendocrine tumor: A case report and review of literature. Ectopic recurrence following treatment of arteriovenous malformations in an adult: A case report and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1