Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire into Urdu language.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2206477
Muhammad Nazim Farooq, Somiya Naz, Aqsa Shafiq Mughal, Sara Sohail, Maham Anis
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire into Urdu language.","authors":"Muhammad Nazim Farooq, Somiya Naz, Aqsa Shafiq Mughal, Sara Sohail, Maham Anis","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2206477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) has been translated and validated in a number of languages and has good psychometric properties for assessing neck pain. However, an Urdu translation is currently unavailable.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the NBQ into Urdu language (NBQ-U) in patients with nonspecific neck pain (NSNP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NBQ was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Urdu using previously described guidelines. The study included 150 Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP and 50 healthy participants. All participants completed the NBQ-U, Urdu version of neck disability index (NDI-U), neck pain and disability scale (NPDS), and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). After three weeks of physical therapy treatment, the patients completed all of the above-mentioned questionnaires, along with the global rating of change scale. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness were all tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NBQ-U demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The NBQ-U showed moderate to strong correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS (<i>r</i> = 0.67-0.73, <i>P</i> < .001). The results revealed a significant difference between patients and healthy controls in the NBQ-U total scores (<i>P</i> < .001). The NBQ-U has a single factor structure with no floor or ceiling effects for individual item scores or total scores. A significant difference in the NBQ-U change scores between the stable and the improved groups (<i>P</i> < .001) confirmed its responsiveness. Furthermore, the NBQ-U change score showed moderate correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS change scores (<i>r</i> = 0.52-0.62, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP, the NBQ-U demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2206477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) has been translated and validated in a number of languages and has good psychometric properties for assessing neck pain. However, an Urdu translation is currently unavailable.

Purpose: To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the NBQ into Urdu language (NBQ-U) in patients with nonspecific neck pain (NSNP).

Methods: The NBQ was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Urdu using previously described guidelines. The study included 150 Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP and 50 healthy participants. All participants completed the NBQ-U, Urdu version of neck disability index (NDI-U), neck pain and disability scale (NPDS), and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). After three weeks of physical therapy treatment, the patients completed all of the above-mentioned questionnaires, along with the global rating of change scale. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness were all tested.

Results: The NBQ-U demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). The NBQ-U showed moderate to strong correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS (r = 0.67-0.73, P < .001). The results revealed a significant difference between patients and healthy controls in the NBQ-U total scores (P < .001). The NBQ-U has a single factor structure with no floor or ceiling effects for individual item scores or total scores. A significant difference in the NBQ-U change scores between the stable and the improved groups (P < .001) confirmed its responsiveness. Furthermore, the NBQ-U change score showed moderate correlations with NDI-U, NPDS, and NPRS change scores (r = 0.52-0.62, P < .001).

Conclusion: In Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP, the NBQ-U demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将 Neck Bournemouth 问卷改编成乌尔都语并进行跨文化验证。
背景:伯恩茅斯颈部问卷(NBQ)已被翻译成多种语言并通过验证,在评估颈部疼痛方面具有良好的心理测量特性。目的:在非特异性颈部疼痛(NSNP)患者中翻译、跨文化调整并验证乌尔都语 NBQ(NBQ-U):方法:采用之前描述的指南将 NBQ 翻译成乌尔都语并进行跨文化调整。研究对象包括 150 名讲乌尔都语的非特异性颈痛患者和 50 名健康参与者。所有参与者都填写了 NBQ-U、乌尔都语版颈部残疾指数 (NDI-U)、颈部疼痛和残疾量表 (NPDS) 以及疼痛评分量表 (NPRS)。经过三周的物理治疗后,患者完成了上述所有问卷以及总体变化评分量表。结果表明,NBQ-U 的测试结果非常好:结果:NBQ-U 的测试-重复测试可靠性极佳(类内相关系数 = 0.92),内部一致性高(克朗巴赫α = 0.89)。NBQ-U 与 NDI-U、NPDS 和 NPRS 呈中度至高度相关(r = 0.67-0.73,P P P r = 0.52-0.62,P 结论:在讲乌尔都语的 NSNP 患者中,NBQ-U 显示出良好的可靠性、有效性和响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Women's experiences of physical therapy treatment for vulvodynia. Teaching person-centered practice to pre-registration physiotherapy students: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy provided for patients undergoing thoracic surgery in Sweden - a national survey of practice. Patients' lived body experiences in the intensive care unit and beyond - a meta-ethnographic synthesis. The quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's Disease: is it related to functionality and tremor severity? A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1