Correlation between Interocular Asymmetry of Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Defect in Glaucoma.

Eun Jung Choi, Kyung Nam Kim, Mi Yeon Song, Young Hoon Hwang
{"title":"Correlation between Interocular Asymmetry of Corneal Hysteresis and Visual Field Defect in Glaucoma.","authors":"Eun Jung Choi,&nbsp;Kyung Nam Kim,&nbsp;Mi Yeon Song,&nbsp;Young Hoon Hwang","doi":"10.3341/kjo.2022.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between interocular asymmetries of corneal hysteresis (CH) and visual field defects in Korean patients with glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 444 eyes from 222 participants with glaucoma in at least one eye were enrolled. CH was measured using an ocular response analyzer (Reichert Technologies Inc). Eyes of each participant were classified into \"better eye\" and \"worse eye\" based on the mean deviation (MD) value of visual field test. The correlation between interocular differences in intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, CH, and MD values was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. To exclude the possible effect of antiglaucoma medication on corneal properties, additional analyses were performed on eyes without any glaucoma treatment at the time of CH measurement (treatment-naive group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median (interquartile range) MD value was -3.71 dB (-6.87 to -1.30 dB) in the better eye and -10.20 dB (-16.32 to -5.62 dB) in the worse eye. When the correlation between the asymmetry of the MD value and asymmetry of intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, and CH were evaluated, only interocular differences in CH were significantly associated with interocular differences in MD values (rho = 0.214, p = 0.001). Among the 222 participants, 60 (27.0%) were treatment-naive group. In these eyes, interocular differences in CH were also significantly associated with interocular differences in the MD values (rho = 0.285, p = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interocular asymmetry of CH was significantly correlated with the interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":17883,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","volume":"37 2","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/0c/kjo-2022-0120.PMC10151164.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2022.0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between interocular asymmetries of corneal hysteresis (CH) and visual field defects in Korean patients with glaucoma.

Methods: A total of 444 eyes from 222 participants with glaucoma in at least one eye were enrolled. CH was measured using an ocular response analyzer (Reichert Technologies Inc). Eyes of each participant were classified into "better eye" and "worse eye" based on the mean deviation (MD) value of visual field test. The correlation between interocular differences in intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, CH, and MD values was evaluated using Spearman correlation analysis. To exclude the possible effect of antiglaucoma medication on corneal properties, additional analyses were performed on eyes without any glaucoma treatment at the time of CH measurement (treatment-naive group).

Results: Median (interquartile range) MD value was -3.71 dB (-6.87 to -1.30 dB) in the better eye and -10.20 dB (-16.32 to -5.62 dB) in the worse eye. When the correlation between the asymmetry of the MD value and asymmetry of intraocular pressure, axial length, central corneal thickness, and CH were evaluated, only interocular differences in CH were significantly associated with interocular differences in MD values (rho = 0.214, p = 0.001). Among the 222 participants, 60 (27.0%) were treatment-naive group. In these eyes, interocular differences in CH were also significantly associated with interocular differences in the MD values (rho = 0.285, p = 0.029).

Conclusions: The interocular asymmetry of CH was significantly correlated with the interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in glaucoma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼眼间角膜迟滞不对称性与视野缺损的关系。
目的:探讨韩国青光眼患者角膜迟滞(CH)眼间不对称与视野缺损的关系。方法:222名至少有一只眼睛患有青光眼的参与者共444只眼睛被纳入研究。使用眼反应分析仪(Reichert Technologies Inc)测量CH。根据视野测试的平均偏差(MD)值将被试眼睛分为“较好眼”和“较差眼”。使用Spearman相关分析评估眼内压、眼轴长度、角膜中央厚度、CH和MD值的眼间差异之间的相关性。为了排除抗青光眼药物对角膜特性的可能影响,在测量CH时对未接受任何青光眼治疗的眼睛(未接受治疗组)进行了额外的分析。结果:好眼MD值中位数为-3.71 dB (-6.87 ~ -1.30 dB),差眼MD值中位数为-10.20 dB (-16.32 ~ -5.62 dB)。当评估MD值的不对称性与眼压、眼轴长度、角膜中央厚度和CH的不对称性之间的相关性时,只有CH的眼间差异与MD值的眼间差异有显著相关性(rho = 0.214, p = 0.001)。222例患者中,未治疗组60例(27.0%)。在这些眼中,CH的眼间差异也与MD值的眼间差异显著相关(rho = 0.285, p = 0.029)。结论:青光眼CH眼间不对称与视野缺损眼间不对称有显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊最新文献
Restoration of Corneal Transparency in a Patient with Corneal Scarring Using Mesenchyme Stem Cells: A Case Report. One-Year Outcomes of Ab Externo XEN45 Gel Stent Implantation with an Open Conjunctiva Approach in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma. Comparison of Accuracy of Six Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas. Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Preloaded Imported Graft. Short-term Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection for Treatment-Naive Exudate Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1